Previous accounts of mammalian brain allometry have relied largely on data from primates, insectivores and bats. Here we examine scaling of brain structures in carnivores, ungulates, xenarthrans and sirenians, taxa chosen to maximize potential olfactory and limbic system variability. The data were compared to known scaling of the same structures in bats, insectivores and primates. Fundamental patterns in brain scaling were similar across all taxa. Marine mammals with reduced olfactory bulbs also had reduced limbic systems overall, particularly in those structures receiving direct olfactory input. In all species, a limbic factor with olfactory and non-olfactory components was observed. Primates, insectivores, ungulate and marine mammals collectively demonstrate an inverse relationship between isocortex and limbic volumes, but terrestrial carnivores have high relative volumes of both, and bats low relative volumes of both. We discuss developmental processes that may provide the mechanistic bases for understanding these findings.

Keywords:
Nervous system, Evolution, Morphometry, Carnivora, Perrisodactyla, Artiodactyla, Xenarthra, Sirenia
1.
Allman J, Rosin A, Kumar R, Hasenstaub A (1998) Parenting and survival in anthropoid primates: Caretakers live longer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:6866–6869.
2.
Baron G, Stephan H, Frahm HD (1996) Comparative Neurobiology in Chiroptera (3 vols.). Basel: Birkhäuser Verlag.
3.
Barton RA (2001) The coordinated structure of mosaic brain evolution. Behav Brain Sci 24:281–282.
4.
Barton RA, Harvey PH (2000) Mosaic evolution of brain structure in mammals. Nature 405:1055–1058.
5.
Barton RA, Aggleton JP, Grenyer R (2003) Evolutionary coherence of the mammalian amygdala. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:539–543.
6.
Clancy B, Darlington RB, Finlay BL (2000) The course of human events: Predicting the timing of primate neural development. Devel Sci 3:57–66.
7.
Clancy B, Darlington RB, Finlay BL (2001) Translating developmental time across mammalian species. Neurosci 105:7–17.
8.
Clark DA, Mitra PP, Wang SS-H (2001) Scalable architecture in mammalian brains. Nature 411:189–193.
9.
Cooper HM, Herbin M, Nevo E (1993) Visual system of a naturally microphthalmic mammal – the blind mole rat, Spalax ehrenbergi. J Comp Neurol 328:313–350.
10.
de Winter W, Oxnard CE (2001) Evolutionary radiations and convergences in the structural organization of mammalian brains. Nature 409:710–714.
11.
Deutsch JC (1992) Olfactory cues influence female choice in two lek-breeding antelopes. Nature 356:596–598.
12.
Eisenberg JF (1981) The Mammalian Radiations. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.
13.
Eisenberg JF, Wilson DE (1978) Relative brain size and feeding strategies in the Chiroptera. Evolution 32:740–751.
14.
Finlay BL, Darlington RB (1995) Linked regularities in the development and evolution of mammalian brains. Science 268:1578–1584.
15.
Finlay BL, Hersman MN, Darlington RB (1998) Patterns of vertebrate neurogenesis and the paths of vertebrate evolution. Brain Behav Evol 52:232–242.
16.
Finlay BL, Darlington RB, Nicastro N (2001) Developmental structure in brain evolution. Behav Brain Sci 24:263–308.
17.
Gittleman JL (1991) Carnivore olfactory bulb size – allometry, phylogeny and ecology. J Zool Lond 225:253–272.
18.
Gittleman JL (1995) Carnivore brain size, behavioural ecology and phylogeny. J Mammal 67:3–36.
19.
Gould SJ (1975) Allometry in primates, with emphasis on scaling and the evolution of the brain. Cont Primatol 5:244–292.
20.
Hart BL (1983) Flehmen behavior and vomeronasal organ function. In: Chemical Signals in Vertebrates III (Silverstein RM, Muller-Schwarze D, eds), pp 87–103. New York: Plenum Press.
21.
Jerison HJ (1973) Evolution of the Brain and Intelligence. New York: Academic Press.
22.
LeDoux JE (2000) Emotion circuits in the brain. Ann Rev Neurosci 23:155–184.
23.
Levitt P (1984) A monoclonal antibody to limbic system neurons. Science 223:299–301.
24.
Levitt P, Barbe MF, Eagleson KL (1997) Patterning and specification of the cerebral cortex. Ann Rev Neurosci 20:1–24.
25.
Nemeschkal HL (1999) Morphometric correlation patterns of adult birds (Fringillidae: passeriformes and columbiformes) mirror the expression of developmental control genes. Evolution 53:899–918.
26.
Price T (1997) Correlated evolution and independent contrasts. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 352:519–529.
27.
Puelles L, Rubenstein LR (2003) Forebrain gene expression domains and the evolving prosomeric model. Trends Neurosci 26:469–476.
28.
Ratcliffe JM, Fenton MB, Shettleworth SJ (2006) Behavioral flexibility positively correlated with relative brain volume in predatory bats. Brain Behav Evol 67:165–176.
29.
Redford KH (1985) Feeding and food preference in captive and wild giant anteaters (Myrmecophaga-tridactyla). J Zool 205:559–572.
30.
Reep RL (1984) The relationship between prefrontal and limbic cortex – a comparative anatomical review. Brain Behav Evol 25:5–80.
31.
Reep RL, Johnson JI, Switzer RC, Welker WI (1989) Manatee cerebral cortex: cytoarchitecture of the frontal region in Trichechus manatus latirostris. Brain Behav Evol 34:365–386.
32.
Rilling JK, Insel TR (1998) Evolution of the cerebellum in primates: Differences in relative volume among monkeys, apes and humans. Brain Behav Evol 52:308–314.
33.
Rubenstein JLR, Martinez S, Shimamura K, Puelles L (1994) The embryonic vertebrate forebrain: The prosomeric model. Science 266:578–580.
34.
Squire L (1992) Memory and the hippocampus – a synthesis from findings with rats, monkeys and humans. Psych Review 99:195–231.
35.
Stephan H, Frahm H, Baron G (1981) New and revised data on volumes of brain structures in insectivores and primates. Folia primatol 35:1–29.
36.
Uylings HBM, van Eden CG, Hofman MA (1986) Morphometry of size/volume variables and comparison of their bivariate relations in the nervous system under different conditions. J Neurosci Meth 18:19–37.
37.
Welker WI, Johnson JI, Noe A (2006) Comparative Mammalian brain collections. Worldwide web: http://brainmuseum.org/index.html
38.
Wilson DE, Reeder DM (1993) Mammal Species of the World: a Taxonomic and Geographical Reference, 2nd Edition. Washington, D.C.:Smithsonian Institution Press.
© 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel
2007
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.