Login to MyKarger

New to MyKarger? Click here to sign up.



Login with Facebook

Forgot your password?

Authors, Editors, Reviewers

For Manuscript Submission, Check or Review Login please go to Submission Websites List.

Submission Websites List

Institutional Login
(Shibboleth or Open Athens)

For the academic login, please select your country in the dropdown list. You will be redirected to verify your credentials.

Consensus Guidelines

Free Access

Challenges in Harmonizing Energy and Nutrient Recommendations in Europe

Pavlovic M.a · Prentice A.b · Thorsdottir I.c · Wolfram G.d · Branca F.e

Author affiliations

aDepartment of Nutrition and Metabolism, Institute for Medical Research, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia; bMedical Research Council, Human Nutrition Research, Elsie Widdowson Laboratory, Cambridge, UK; cUnit for Nutrition Research, Landspitali-University Hospital and Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland; dDepartment Nutrition and Food Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany; eWorld Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark

Corresponding Author

Mirjana Pavlovic

Teslina Street 68/12

CS–24000 Subotica (Serbia)

Tel./Fax +381 24 548 398, E-Mail mirjana.pavlovicmd@gmail.com

Related Articles for ""

Ann Nutr Metab 2007;51:108–114

Do you have an account?

Login Information





Contact Information











I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.



Abstract

At the present time, there is considerable diversity in the dietary reference values and recommendations used across Europe, both in terms of terminology and guideline values. Harmonization of dietary reference values would be beneficial in simplifying nutritional policy, trade, and public understanding of diet and health issues. However, this is not a simple task because of the differences in methodological approaches adopted and the assumptions made. In addition, there are genuine differences in diet, lifestyle and geography that may necessitate retaining variation in some dietary reference values between European nations. The complexities of harmonization were discussed at a recent symposium held under the auspices of the Federation of European Nutrition Societies (FENS). This provided overviews of the different terminologies currently in use, of the variations in reference values for children and adolescents, and of the disparities between different groups of countries in Europe. The symposium hosted by FENS provided a forum to exchange views and to consider the steps that will be needed if harmonization is to be realized in the future. A summary of the presentations and conclusions is presented here.

© 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel


References

  1. Aggett PJ, Bresson J, Haschke F, et al: Recommended Dietary Allowances (RDAs), Recommended Intakes (RDIs), Recommended Nutrient Intakes (PRIs) are not ‘recommended intakes’. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1997;25:236—241.
  2. FAO/WHO/UNU: Human Energy Requirements. Report of a Joint Expert Consultation Rome, 17–24 October 2001. FAO Food and Nutrition Technical Report Series, 2001.
  3. FENS (2005): http://www.fensweb.org/show article.php?menu=1&article=2&channel=1 (as of April 7, 2006).
  4. Dietary Reference Values for Food Energy and Nutrients for the United Kingdom, 10th impression (with revised section on fluoride). London, Stationery Office, Department of Health, 1991.
  5. Prentice A, Branca F, Decsi T, Michaelsen KF, Fletcher RJ, Guesry P, Manz F, Vidailhet M, Pannemans D, Samartin S: Energy and nutrient dietary reference values for children in Europe: methodological approaches and current nutritional recommendations. Br J Nutr 2004;92(suppl 2):S83–S146.
    External Resources
  6. Prentice A: An overview of nutrient reference values across Europe, power point presentation from the FENS workshop ‘Harmonization of the nutrient requirements’. IUNS 18th Int Congr Nutr, Sept 2005, Durban, South Africa.
  7. Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2004: Integrating Nutrition and Physical Activity. NORD 2004. Copenhagen, Nordic Council of Ministries, 2004.
  8. Becker B, Lyhne N, Pedersen AN, Aro A, Fogelholm M, Thorsdottir I, Alexander J, Andersen SA, Meltzer HM, Pedersen JI: Nordic nutrition recommendations 2004 – integrating nutrition and physical activity (abstract). 18th Int Congr Nutr, Sept 2005, Durban, South Africa. Nutrition Safari for Innovative Solutions. Ann Nutr Metabol 2005(suppl 49):85.
  9. German Nutrition Society, Austrian Nutrition Society, Swiss Society for Nutrition Research, Swiss Nutrition Association: Reference Values for Nutrient Intake (D-A-CH), ed 1. Frankfurt am Main, Umschau/Braus, 2000.
  10. Wolfram G, Elmadfa I, Erbersdobler H, Stehle P, Walter P: DACH – reference values. A model for reference values in central Europe (abstract). 18th Int Congr Nutr, Sept 2005, Durban, South Africa. Nutrition Safari for Innovative Solutions. Ann Nutr Metab 2005(suppl 49):85.
  11. WHO/FAO: Human Vitamin and Mineral Requirements. Report of a Joint FAO/WHO Expert Consultation, Bangkok. WHO/FAO, Rome, 2002.
  12. WHO: Energy and protein requirements. Report of a joint FAO/WHO/UNU Expert Consultation. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 1985;724:1–206.
    External Resources
  13. WHO/FAO: Diet, nutrition and the prevention of chronic diseases. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 2003;916:i–viii, 1–149, backcover.
    External Resources
  14. Scientific Committee on Food of the European community: Proposed nutrient and energy intakes for the European Community. Nutr Rev 1993;51:209–212.
  15. Scrimshaw NS: Human protein requirements: a brief update. http://www.unu.edu/unupress/food/8F173e/8F173E02.htm (as of April 8, 2006).
  16. Jackson AA: Human protein requirement: policy issue. Proc Nutr Soc 2001;60:7–11.
  17. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO/World Health Organization): Protein Quality Evaluation in Human Diets. FAO Food and Nutrition Paper 51. Rome, FAO, 1991.
  18. IM: Dietary Reference Intakes for Energy, Carbohydrate, Fiber, Fat, Fatty Acids, Cholesterol, Protein, Amino Acids. Washington, Institute of Medicine, 2002. www.nap.edu/catalog/10490.html (as of April 7, 2006).

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Consensus Guidelines

Received: November 07, 2006
Accepted: December 27, 2006
Published online: May 07, 2007
Issue release date: June 2007

Number of Print Pages: 7
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 1

ISSN: 0250-6807 (Print)
eISSN: 1421-9697 (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/ANM


Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.