Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation
Original Paper
The Outcome of Triplet versus Twin PregnanciesZiadeh S.M.Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Amman, Jordan
Keywords: Perinatal outcomeTripletTwin gestations |
|
Log in to MyKarger to check if you already have access to this content.
KAB
Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!
If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.
Save over 20% compared to the individual article price.
Article / Publication Details
Published online: August 16, 2000
Issue release date: August 2000
Number of Print Pages: 4
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 5
ISSN: 0378-7346 (Print)
eISSN: 1423-002X (Online)
For additional information: https://www.karger.com/GOI
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to examine and to determine whether triplet pregnancies are associated with a significantly greater risk of adverse outcome than are twin pregnancies. Methods: Maternal and perinatal outcomes were evaluated retrospectively in 41 sets of triplets and twin pregnancies that were matched for maternal age, parity, mode of delivery, preterm delivery, mode of conception, and antepartum complications. Main Outcome Measures: Perinatal outcome in triplet versus twin gestation. Results: Triplets had a significantly lower mean average birth weight than in twin gestation (1,596 vs. 2,317 g, p < 0.018) and gestational age at delivery (32.9 vs. 35.9 weeks; p < 0.03). Preterm labour occurred significantly more often in triplet than in twin gestation (80.5 vs. 41.5%) as did preterm delivery (87.8 vs. 46.2%). Triplets required a longer hospital stay than did twins (25 vs. 9 days; p < 0.04). There were no significant differences between the groups in number of administrations to the Special Care Baby Unit (32.5 vs. 30.5%). Apgar score <7 at 5 min was significantly more in triplet as compared with twin gestation (17 vs. 6%; p < 0.0015). Neonatal deaths occurred significantly more in triplets than in twins (26 vs. 8.5%; p < 0.0001). There were no significant differences between the groups in maternal antepartum or neonatal complications such as anaemia, pregnancy-induced hypertension, placental abruption, respiratory distress syndrome or intraventricular haemorrhage. Preterm labour was the only complication that occurred significantly more often in the triplet than in the twin gestation. Conclusions: We concluded that this information could be useful in counseling patients with respect to the anticipated perinatal outcome of triplet pregnancies.
© 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel
Related Articles:
References
- Doyle P: The outcome of multiple pregnancy. Hum Reprod 1996;11:110–117.
- Makhseed M, Al Sharhan M, Egbase P, Al-Essa M, Grudzinskas JG: Maternal and perinatal outcomes of multiple pregnancy following IVF-ET. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1998;61:155–163.
- Lipitz S, Reichman B, Parent G, Modan M, Shalev J, David M: The improving outcome of triplet pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989;161:1279–1284.
- Nyirati I, Orvos H, Bartafai G, Kovacs L: Iatrogenic multiple pregnancy. Higher risk than a spontaneous one? J Reprod Med 1997;42:695–698.
- Crowther CA: Prevention of preterm birth in multiple pregnancy. Baillières Clin Obstet Gynaecol 1998;12:67–75.
- Melgari CA, Rosenfeld DL, Rawlinson K, Greenberg M: Perinatal outcome after multifetal reduction to twins compared with nonreduced multiple gestations. Obstet Gynecol 1991;78:763–767.
- Tuppin P, Blondel P, Raminski M: Trends in multiple deliveries and infertility treatments in France. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1993;100:383–385.
- Sasson DA, Castro LC, Davis JL, Hobel CJ: Perinatal outcome in triplet versus twin gestations. Obstet Gynecol 1990;75:817–820.
-
Newman RB, Hamre C, Miller MC: Outpatient triplet management: A contemporary view. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989;161:347–355.
- Lipitz SL, Reichman B, Paret G, et al: The improving outcome of triplet pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989;161:1279–1284.
-
Penev I, Negestov N, Vlasova D, Marinov B: Surgical delivery in multiple pregnancy. Akush Ginekol (Sofia) 1996;35:1–4.
- Ben Shachar I, Weinstein D: High-risk pregnancy outcome by route of delivery. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 1998;10:447–452.
-
Hohlfeld P, Writhner D: Vaginal delivery in multiple pregnancy – A plea for spontaneous delivery. Arch Gynecol Obstet 1996;259:137–146.
External Resources
- Paskaleva V, Kichukova D, Milchev N, Krumov G, Belcheva R, Shekova D: A procedure for delivery in multiple pregnancy based on our data. Akush Ginekol (Sofiia) 1996;35:13–14.
Article / Publication Details
Published online: August 16, 2000
Issue release date: August 2000
Number of Print Pages: 4
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 5
ISSN: 0378-7346 (Print)
eISSN: 1423-002X (Online)
For additional information: https://www.karger.com/GOI
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

Get Permission