Neuroepidemiology
Original Paper
Epidemiology of Multiple Sclerosis in US Veterans6. Population Ancestry and Surname Ethnicity as Risk Factors for Multiple Sclerosis
Page W.F.a · Mack T.M.b · Kurtzke J.F.c · Murphy F.M.c · Norman, Jr. J.E.d
Medical Follow-up Agency, Institute of Medicine/National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C.; Department of Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, Calif.; Neurology Service, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Washington D.C., and National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Md., USA
|
|
Log in to MyKarger to check if you already have access to this content.
KAB
Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!
If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.
Save over 20% compared to the individual article price.
Article / Publication Details
Published online: October 23, 1995
Issue release date: 1995
Number of Print Pages: 11
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 0
ISSN: 0251-5350 (Print)
eISSN: 1423-0208 (Online)
For additional information: https://www.karger.com/NED
Abstract
Previously, we studied the effect of population ancestry on the risk of multiple sclerosis (MS) in US veterans of World War II, comparing by state 1980 US census ancestry data with MS case/control ratios. Here, the joint effects of population ancestry and surname-derived ethnicity on MS risk are examined in the same series. Census data are used again to characterize the population ancestry of the state from which each subject entered active duty (EAD) – that is, the proportions of the populace reporting various ancestries – and subjects were also individually categorized into a single ethnic group, without knowledge of case/control status, based on surname. In this study population, categorized ethnicity was strongly correlated with population ancestry, as expected. Although univariate analyses showed statistically significant associations between MS risk and several surname-derived ethnicities and ethnic groups, when residence at EAD was accounted for as well, there was almost no ethnic variation in MS risk. A logistic regression analysis further showed that variations in MS risk are associated most strongly with latitude and population ancestry group; in particular, subjects who entered military service from states with higher proportions of Swedish or French ancestry had higher risks of MS. After adjustment for characteristics of place, the only significant individual ethnicity factor found was Southern European ethnicity. In general, we conclude that an individual''s ethnicity seems to be of less relative importance in determining MS risk than is the population ancestry of the state of EAD. These findings underscore the fact that MS is a disease of place, with ''place'' including not only attributes of the locale (e.g., latitude), but also of its populace (e.g., ancestry).
© 1995 S. Karger AG, Basel
Related Articles:
Article / Publication Details
Published online: October 23, 1995
Issue release date: 1995
Number of Print Pages: 11
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 0
ISSN: 0251-5350 (Print)
eISSN: 1423-0208 (Online)
For additional information: https://www.karger.com/NED
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

Get Permission