Login to MyKarger

New to MyKarger? Click here to sign up.



Login with Facebook

Forgot your password?

Authors, Editors, Reviewers

For Manuscript Submission, Check or Review Login please go to Submission Websites List.

Submission Websites List

Institutional Login
(Shibboleth or Open Athens)

For the academic login, please select your country in the dropdown list. You will be redirected to verify your credentials.

Lagged Cells

Saul A.B.

Author affiliations

Department of Ophthalmology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Ga., USA

Corresponding Author

Alan B. Saul

Department of Ophthalmology

Medical College of Georgia

Augusta, GA 30912 (USA)

Tel. +1 706 721 0695, E-Mail asaul@mcg.edu

Related Articles for ""

Neurosignals 2008;16:209–225

Do you have an account?

Login Information





Contact Information










I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.



Abstract

The timing of the retinal input to the lateral geniculate nucleus is highly modified in lagged cells. Evidence is reviewed for how the responses of these cells are generated, how their structure and function differs from their nonlagged neighbors, and what their projections to cortex might do.

© 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel


References

  1. Hubel DH, Wiesel TN: Integrative action in the cat’s lateral geniculate body. J Physiol 1961;155:385–398.
  2. Hubel DH, Wiesel TN: Receptive fields of single neurones in the cat’s striate cortex. J Physiol 1959;148:574–591.
  3. Humphrey AL, Saul AB: The temporal transformation of retinal signals in the lateral geniculate nucleus of the cat: implications for cortical function; in Minciacchi D, Molinari M, Macchi G, Jones EG (eds): Thalamic Networks for Relay and Modulation. Oxford, Pergamon, 1993, pp 81–89.
  4. Humphrey AL, Saul AB: The emergence of direction selectivity in cat primary visual cortex; in Payne BR, Peters A (eds): Cat Primary Visual Cortex. New York, Academic Press, 2002, pp 343–386.
  5. Enroth-Cugell C, Robson JG: The contrast sensitivity of retinal ganglion cells of the cat. J Physiol (Lond) 1966;187:517–552.
  6. Guillery RW: A study of Golgi preparations from the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus of the adult cat. J Comp Neurol 1966;128:21–50.
  7. Friedlander MJ, Lin C-S, Stanford LR, Sherman SM: Morphology of functionally identified neurons in lateral geniculate nucleus of the cat. J Neurophysiol 1981;46:80–129.
  8. Humphrey AL, Weller RE: Structural correlates of functionally distinct X-cells in the lateral geniculate nucleus of the cat. J Comp Neurol 1988;268:448–468.
  9. Stone J: Sampling properties of microelectrodes assessed in the cat’s retina. J Neurophysiol 1973;36:1071–1079.
  10. Crick F: Function of the thalamic reticular complex: the searchlight hypothesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1984;81:4586–4590.
  11. Mastronarde DN: Two classes of single-input X-cells in cat lateral geniculate nucleus. II. Retinal inputs and the generation of receptive field properties. J Neurophysiol 1987;57:381–413.
  12. Mastronarde DN: Two classes of single-input X-cells in cat lateral geniculate nucleus. I. Receptive field properties and classification of cells. J Neurophysiol 1987;57:357–380.
  13. Humphrey AL, Weller RE: Functionally distinct groups of X-cells in the lateral geniculate nucleus of the cat. J Comp Neurol 1988;268:429–447.
  14. Cai D, DeAngelis GC, Freeman RD: Spatiotemporal receptive field organization in the lateral geniculate nucleus of cats and kittens. J Neurophysiol 1997;78:1045–1061.
  15. Wolfe J, Palmer LA: Temporal diversity in the lateral geniculate nucleus of cat. Vis Neurosci 1998;15:653–675.
  16. Saul AB, Feidler JC: Development of response timing and direction selectivity in cat visual thalamus and cortex. J Neurosci 2002;22:2945–2955.
  17. Mastronarde DN, Humphrey AL, Saul AB: Lagged Y cells in the cat lateral geniculate nucleus. Vis Neurosci 1991;7:191–200.
  18. Tang Y, Saul AB, Gur M, Goei S, Wong E, Ersoy B, Snodderly DM: Eye position compensation improves estimates of response magnitude and receptive field geometry in alert monkeys. J Neurophysiol 2007;97:3439–3448.
  19. Heggelund P, Hartveit E: Neurotransmitter receptors mediating excitatory input to cells in the cat lateral geniculate nucleus. I. Lagged cells. J Neurophysiol 1990;63:1347–1360.
  20. Hartveit E, Heggelund P: Neurotransmitter receptors mediating excitatory input to cells in the cat lateral geniculate nucleus. II. Non-lagged cells. J Neurophysiol 1990;63:1361–1372.
  21. Kwon YH, Esguerra M, Sur M: NMDA and non-NMDA receptors mediate visual responses of neurons in the cat’s lateral geniculate nucleus. J Neurophysiol 1991;66:414–428.
  22. Demeulemeester H, Arckens L, Vandesande F, Orban GA, Heizmann CW, Pochet R: Calcium binding proteins as molecular markers for cat geniculate neurons. Exp Brain Res 1991;83:513–520.
  23. McCormick DA: Functional properties of a slowly inactivating potassium current in guinea pig dorsal lateral geniculate relay neurons. J Neurophysiol 1991;66:1176–1189.
  24. Augustinaite S, Heggelund P: Changes in firing pattern of lateral geniculate neurons caused by membrane potential dependent modulation of retinal input through NMDA receptors. J Physiol 2007;582:297–315.
  25. Steriade M, Pare D, Hu B, Deschenes M: The visual thalamocortical system and its modulation by the brain stem core; in Ottoson D (ed): Progress in Sensory Physiology 10. Berlin, Springer, 1990.
  26. Uhlrich DJ, Tamamaki N, Sherman SM: Brainstem control of response modes in neurons of the cat’s lateral geniculate nucleus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1990;87:2560–2563.
  27. Humphrey AL, Saul AB: Action of brain stem reticular afferents on lagged and nonlagged cells in the lateral geniculate nucleus. J Neurophysiol 1992;68:673–691.
  28. Hartveit E, Heggelund P: Brain-stem influence on visual response of lagged and nonlagged cells in the cat lateral geniculate nucleus. Vis Neurosci 1993;10:325–339.
  29. Hartveit E: Simultaneous recording of lagged and nonlagged cells in the cat dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus. Exp Brain Res 1992;88:229–232.
  30. Mastronarde DN: Nonlagged relay cells and interneurons in the cat lateral geniculate nucleus: receptive-field properties and retinal inputs. Vis Neurosci 1992;8:407–441.
  31. Saul AB, Humphrey AL: Spatial and temporal response properties of lagged and non-lagged cells in the cat lateral geniculate nucleus. J Neurophysiol 1990;64:206–224.
  32. Mitzdorf U, Singer W: Prominent excitatory pathways in the cat visual cortex (A17 and A18): a current source density analysis of electrically evoked potentials. Exp Brain Res 1978;33:371–394.
  33. Leventhal AG: Evidence that the different classes of relay cells of the cat’s lateral geniculate nucleus terminate in different layers of the striate cortex. Exp Brain Res 1979;37:349–372.
  34. Saul AB, Humphrey AL: Evidence of input from lagged cells in the lateral geniculate nucleus to simple cells in cortical area 17 of the cat. J Neurophysiol 1992b;68:1190–1207.
  35. Reid RC, Soodak RE, Shapley RM: Linear mechanisms of directional selectivity in simple cells of cat striate cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1987;84:8740–8744.
  36. McLean J, Palmer LA: Contribution of linear spatiotemporal receptive field structure to velocity selectivity of simple cells in area 17 of cat. Vis Res 1989;29:675–679.
  37. Albrecht DG, Geisler WS: Motion selectivity and the contrast-response function of simple cells in the visual cortex. Vis Neurosci 1991;7:531–546.
  38. Tolhurst DJ, Dean AF: Evaluation of a linear model of directional selectivity in simple cells of the cat’s striate cortex. Vis Neurosci 1991;6:421–428.
  39. DeAngelis GC, Ohzawa I, Freeman RD: Spatiotemporal organization of simple-cell receptive fields in the cat’s striate cortex. II. Linearity of temporal and spatial summation. J Neurophysiol 1993;69:1118–1135.
  40. Jagadeesh B, Wheat HS, Ferster D: Linearity of summation of synaptic potentials underlying direction selectivity in simple cells of the cat visual cortex. Science 1993;262:1901–1904.
  41. McLean J, Raab S, Palmer LA: Contribution of linear mechanisms to the specification of local motion by simple cells in areas 17 and 18 of the cat. Vis Neurosci 1994;11:271–294.
  42. Murthy A, Humphrey AL, Saul AB, Feidler JC: Laminar differences in the spatiotemporal structure of simple cell receptive fields in cat area 17. Vis Neurosci 1998;15:239–256.
  43. Baker CL Jr: Linear filtering and nonlinear interactions in direction-selective visual cortex neurons: a noise correlation analysis. Vis Neurosci 2001;18:465–485.
  44. Saul AB, Humphrey AL: Temporal frequency tuning of direction selectivity in cat visual cortex. Vis Neurosci 1992a;8:365–372.
  45. Hubel DH, Wiesel TN: Receptive fields in striate cortex of very young, visually inexperienced kittens. J Neurophysiol 1963;26:994–1002.
  46. Majorossy K, Kiss A: Specific patterns of neuron arrangement and of synaptic articulation in the medical geniculate body. Exp Brain Res 1976;26:1–17.
  47. Somogyi Gy, Hajdu F, Tömböl T: Ultrastructure of the anterior ventral and anterior medial nuclei of the cat thalamus. Exp Brain Res 1978;31:417–431.
  48. Ohara PT, Lieberman AR, Hunt SP, Wu JY: Neural elements containing glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) in the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus of the rat; immunohistochemical studies by light and electron microscopy. Neuroscience 1983;8:189–211.
  49. Blomqvist A, Flink R, Westman J, Wiberg M: Synaptic terminals in the ventroposterolateral nucleus of the thalamus from neurons in the dorsal column and lateral cervical nuclei: an electron microscopic study in the cat. J Neurocytology 1985;14:869–886.
  50. So KF, Campbell G, Lieberman AR: Synaptic organization of the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus in the adult hamster: an electron microscope study using degeneration and horseradish peroxidase tracing techniques. Anat Embryol (Berl) 1985;171:223–234.
  51. Hamori J, Pasik P, Pasik T: Different types of synaptic triads in the monkey dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus. J Hirnforsch 1991;32:369–379.
  52. Ralston HJ 3rd, Ralston DD: Medial lemniscal and spinal projections to the macaque thalamus: an electron microscopic study of differing GABAergic circuitry serving thalamic somatosensory mechanisms. J Neurosci 1994;14:2485–2502.
  53. Hicks TP, Metherate R, Landry P, Dykes RW: Bicuculline-induced alterations of response properties in functionally identified ventroposterior thalamic neurones. Exp Brain Res 1986;63:248–264.
  54. Fujita I, Konishi M: The role of GABAergic inhibition in processing of interaural time difference in the owl’s auditory system. J Neurosci 1991;11:722–739.
  55. Hooper SL, DiCaprio RA: Crustacean motor pattern generator networks. Neurosignals 2004;13:50–69.
  56. Santamaria F, Bower JM: Background synaptic activity modulates the response of a modeled purkinje cell to paired afferent input. J Neurophysiol 2005;93:235–250.
  57. Hubel DH: Tungsten microelectrode for recording from single units. Science 1957;125:549–550.
  58. Towe AL, Harding GW: Extracellular microelectrode sampling bias. Exp Neurol 1970;29:366–381.
  59. Reichardt W: Autocorrelation: a principle for the evaluation of sensory information by the central nervous system; in Rosenblith WA (ed): Sensory Communication. New York, MIT Press, 1961, pp 303–318.
  60. Torre V, Poggio T: A synaptic mechanism possibly underlying directional selectivity to motion. Proc R Soc Lond [B] 1978;202:409–416.
    External Resources
  61. Borst A, Egelhaaf M: Principles of visual motion detection. Trends Neurosci 1989;12:297–306.
  62. Barlow HB, Levick WR: The mechanism of directionally selective units in rabbit’s retina. J Physiol (Lond) 1965;178:477–504.
  63. Marr D, Ullman S: Direction selectivity and its use in early visual processing. Proc R Soc Lond [B] 1981;211:151–180.
  64. Adelson EH, Bergen JR: Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. J Opt Soc Am [A] 1985;2:284–299.
  65. van Santen JPH, Sperling G: Elaborated Reichardt detectors. J Opt Soc Am [A] 1985;2:300–321.
  66. Watson AB, Ahumada AJ Jr: Model of human visual-motion sensing. J Opt Soc Am A 1985;2:322–342.
  67. Suarez H, Koch C, Douglas R: Modeling direction selectivity of simple cells in striate visual cortex within the framework of the canonical microcircuit. J Neurosci 1995;15:6700–6719.
  68. Maex R, Orban GA: Model circuit of spiking neurons generating directional selectivity in simple cells. J Neurophysiol 1996;75:1515–1545.
  69. Chance FS, Nelson SB, Abbott LF: Synaptic depression and the temporal response characteristics of V1 cells. J Neurosci 1998;18:4785–4799.
  70. Livingstone MS: Mechanisms of direction selectivity in macaque V1. Neuron 1998;20:509–526.
  71. Sabatini SP, Solari F: An architectural hypothesis for direction selectivity in the visual cortex: the role of spatially asymmetric intracortical inhibition. Biol Cybern 1999;80:171–183.

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Paper

Published online: February 05, 2008
Issue release date: February 2008

Number of Print Pages: 17
Number of Figures: 11
Number of Tables: 0

ISSN: 1424-862X (Print)
eISSN: 1424-8638 (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/NSG


Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.