Comparison of Immediate-Release and Controlled Release Carbidopa/Levodopa in Parkinson’s Disease
A Multicenter 5-Year StudyBlock G.a · Liss C.a · Reines S.a · Irr J.b · Nibbelink D.b
The CR First Study GroupaMerck & Co., Inc., Merck Research Laboratories, Blue Bell, Pa.; bDuPont Pharma, DuPont Merck Plaza, Wilmington, Del., USA
Do you have an account?
- Rent for 48h to view
- Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
- Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
- Printing and saving restrictions apply
Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00
Article / Publication Details
Background: Motor response fluctuations and dyskinesias compromise long-term levodopa therapy in Parkinson’s disease. Variations in plasma levodopa levels contribute to adverse reactions associated with chronic therapy. Therefore, sustained-release levodopa preparations may be associated with less motor fluctuations and a better outcome. We conducted a large, 5-year, multicenter study to address this hypothesis. Methods: Six hundred and eighteen nonfluctuating patients with Parkinson’s disease never exposed to levodopa therapy were randomized to (Sinemet® CR 50/200) sustained-release or immediate-release (Sinemet® 25/100) carbidopa/levodopa preparations in 35 centers worldwide. Dosage titration occurred over the 5 years of evaluations to maintain an optimal response. The primary endpoint, the ‘event’, was the presence of motor fluctuations, as defined by 20% ‘off time or 10% ‘on’ time with dyskinesias as recorded in the patient diary, or greater than or equal to a 50% positive response on the physician fluctuations questionnaire. Clinical rating scales, Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) and adverse reactions were also recorded. Findings: During the 5 years of the study, both treatment groups responded extremely well to therapy. The incidence of all patients reaching the ‘event’ was low, approximately 20% by diary criteria and 16% by questionnaire definition, and there was no significant difference between the two treatment groups. Activities of daily living scores in the Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) consistently favored the Sinemet CR treatment group and a number of the NHP scales also favored the CR group. Based upon the frequency of adverse experiences, and the overall low incidence of withdrawals, the two treatment groups demonstrated very similar safety profiles. The most common drug-related effect was nausea; seen in 20% of patients. Other drug-related effects were dizziness, insomnia, abdominal pain, dyskinesia, headache and depression. Drug-related withdrawals were less than 10% of all patients, primarily due to nervous/psychiatric complaints. Interpretation: During a 5-year treatment period, control of parkinsonian symptoms was maintained by both immediate-release and sustained-release carbidopa/levodopa. Both treatment regimens were associated with a low incidence of motor fluctuations and dyskinesias. There was a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) in activities of daily living as measured by the UPDRS in favor of Sinemet CR.
© 1997 S. Karger AG, Basel
Article / Publication Details
Copyright / Drug Dosage / DisclaimerCopyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.