Neuropsychobiology
Relationship between Response to Phenelzine and MAO Inhibition in a Clinical Trial of Phenelzine, Amitriptyline and PlaceboRaft D. · Davidson J. · Wasik J. · Mattox A.Dental Research Center, University of North Carolina Pain Clinic, Chapel Hill, N.C.
|
|
Log in to MyKarger to check if you already have access to this content.
KAB
Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!
If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.
Save over 20% compared to the individual article price.
Article / Publication Details
Published online: February 19, 2008
Issue release date: 1981
Number of Print Pages: 5
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 0
ISSN: 0302-282X (Print)
eISSN: 1423-0224 (Online)
For additional information: https://www.karger.com/NPS
Abstract
This report examines the hypothesis that for phenelzine to be more effective than placebo it is necessary to achieve at least 80% inhibition of platelet MAO activity. This hypothesis was examined in the context of a double-blind comparison of phenelzine, amitriptyline and placebo in depressed patients. When phenelzine became significantly more effective than placebo at 4 weeks, the average MAO inhibition was 85%. By the 5th week, with MAO inhibition greater than 90%, phenelzine was significantly more effective than amitriptyline. A highly significant correlation was noted between improvement and MAO inhibition within the phenelzine group.
© 1981 S. Karger AG, Basel
Related Articles:
Article / Publication Details
Published online: February 19, 2008
Issue release date: 1981
Number of Print Pages: 5
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 0
ISSN: 0302-282X (Print)
eISSN: 1423-0224 (Online)
For additional information: https://www.karger.com/NPS
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

Get Permission