Pediatric Neurosurgery

Original Paper

Progressive Congenital Kyphosis: Report of Five Cases and Review of the Literature

Philips M.F. · Dormans J. · Drummond D. · Schut L. · Sutton L.N.

Author affiliations

Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Pa., USA

Related Articles for ""

Pediatr Neurosurg 1997;26:130–143

Log in to MyKarger to check if you already have access to this content.


Buy

  • FullText & PDF
  • Unlimited re-access via MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

CHF 38.00 *
EUR 35.00 *
USD 39.00 *

Select

KAB

Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!


If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.


Save over 20% compared to the individual article price.

Learn more

Rent/Cloud

  • Rent for 48h to view
  • Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
  • Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
  • Printing and saving restrictions apply

Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00

Select

Subscribe

  • Access to all articles of the subscribed year(s) guaranteed for 5 years
  • Unlimited re-access via Subscriber Login or MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

Subcription rates


Select
* The final prices may differ from the prices shown due to specifics of VAT rules.

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Original Paper

Received: May 23, 1997
Accepted: July 16, 1997
Published online: March 07, 2008
Issue release date: 1997

Number of Print Pages: 14
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 0

ISSN: 1016-2291 (Print)
eISSN: 1423-0305 (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/PNE

Abstract

For over 60 years congenital kyphotic deformities of the spine have been categorized into two distinct groups, depending on the developmental defect. Those arising from a failure of formation of the vertebral bodies were classified as type 1, while those arising from a failure of segmentation were referred to as type 2. Recognition of the progressive and unstable nature of the type 1 defects alerted physicians to the need for early operative stabilization through decompression and stabilization through instrumentation. As the embryogenesis of the spinal column was further investigated, and as diagnostic imaging methods of the spine improved, unstable congenital kyphoses were further subdivided. Progressive congenital kyphotic deformities now may accompany a host of vertebral column developmental defects as well as genetically mediated mesenchymal tissue defect syndromes. This paper presents 5 patients from The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia with progressive and symptomatic congenital kyphotic deformities of the spine. Two of these lesions resulted from defects of formation of the vertebral bodies, while one resulted from segmental spinal dysgenesis, maldevelopment of both the anterior and posterior vertebral elements. One patient’s kyphotic deformity was a result of caudal regression syndrome, and the final case presented experienced a high thoracic kyphosis from a syndrome associated diffuse midline mesenchymal tissue abnormalities known as cerebrocostomandibular syndrome. All patients showed evidence of progressive cord compression and required neural element decompression, fusion, and instrumentation. The cases are discussed individually, and the developmental and clinical aspects of each are explored.

© 1997 S. Karger AG, Basel




Related Articles:


Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Original Paper

Received: May 23, 1997
Accepted: July 16, 1997
Published online: March 07, 2008
Issue release date: 1997

Number of Print Pages: 14
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 0

ISSN: 1016-2291 (Print)
eISSN: 1423-0305 (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/PNE


Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
TOP