Cytogenetic and Genome Research

Original Article

Differences between “spontaneous” and induced sister-chromatid exchanges with fixation time and their chromosome localization

Ockey C.H.

Author affiliations

Paterson Laboratories, Christie Hospital and Holt Radium Institute, Manchester

Related Articles for ""

Cytogenet Cell Genet 1980;26:223–235

Log in to MyKarger to check if you already have access to this content.


Buy

  • FullText & PDF
  • Unlimited re-access via MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

CHF 38.00 *
EUR 35.00 *
USD 39.00 *

Select

KAB

Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!


If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.


Save over 20% compared to the individual article price.

Learn more

Rent/Cloud

  • Rent for 48h to view
  • Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
  • Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
  • Printing and saving restrictions apply

Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00

Select

Subscribe

  • Access to all articles of the subscribed year(s) guaranteed for 5 years
  • Unlimited re-access via Subscriber Login or MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

Subcription rates


Select
* The final prices may differ from the prices shown due to specifics of VAT rules.

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Original Article

Accepted: July 10, 1979
Published online: May 06, 2008
Issue release date: 1980

Number of Print Pages: 13
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 0

ISSN: 1424-8581 (Print)
eISSN: 1424-859X (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/CGR

Abstract

Mean “spontaneous” SCE values have been investigated in synchronized CHO and S3/4 fibroblasts and in phytostimulated human peripheral lymphocytes. Significant increases were found at progressive fixation times following BrdU introduction in all cultures. Similar increases were observed with fixation times in SCEs induced by pulse treatment with methyl methane sulphonate (MMS) at various stages in the S period in CHO cells. In the fibroblast cultures these increases ranged from 20 to 80% with an 8-h interval between fixations. The percentage increase depended on the real proliferation occurring during this fixation interval. In the lymphocyte cultures, fixation intervals ranging from 22 to 54 h yielded increases of 40 to 80%. It is proposed that when SCE yields are compared in the SCE test for potentially damaging agents, the stages in cell proliferation expressed as frequencies of first, second, and third mitoses after BrdU incorporation should be taken into account. The distribution of “spontaneous” and MMS-induced SCE’s have been examined in marker chromosomes of the CHO cells. Although “spontaneous” SCE’s are nonrandomly distributed, they do not appear to show a high incidence over any specific type of banded region. MMS-induced SCEs, on the other hand, are preferentially located over those chromosome sites in replication at the time of pulse treatment.

© 1980 S. Karger AG, Basel




Related Articles:


Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Original Article

Accepted: July 10, 1979
Published online: May 06, 2008
Issue release date: 1980

Number of Print Pages: 13
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 0

ISSN: 1424-8581 (Print)
eISSN: 1424-859X (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/CGR


Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
TOP