Audiology and Neurotology
Original Paper
Brainstem Timing Deficits in Children with Learning Impairment May Result from Corticofugal OriginsSong J.H.a · Banai K.a, d · Kraus N.a-daAuditory Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Communication Sciences, bDepartment of Neurobiology and Physiology, cDepartment of Otolaryngology, and dNorthwestern University Institute of Neuroscience, Northwestern University, Evanston, Ill., USA
|
|
Log in to MyKarger to check if you already have access to this content.
KAB
Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!
If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.
Save over 20% compared to the individual article price.
Access via DeepDyve
- Unlimited fulltext viewing Of this article
- Organize, annotate And mark up articles
- Printing And downloading restrictions apply
Article / Publication Details
Received: October 05, 2007
Accepted: February 01, 2008
Published online: May 19, 2008
Issue release date: July 2008
Number of Print Pages: 10
Number of Figures: 4
Number of Tables: 4
ISSN: 1420-3030 (Print)
eISSN: 1421-9700 (Online)
For additional information: https://www.karger.com/AUD
Abstract
A substantial proportion of children with language-based learning problems [learning disabilities (LD)] display abnormal encoding of speech at rostral levels of the auditory brainstem (i.e. midbrain) as measured by the auditory brainstem response (ABR). Of interest here is whether these timing deficits originate at the rostral brainstem or whether they reflect deficient sensory encoding at lower levels of the auditory pathway. We describe the early brainstem response to speech (waves I and III) in typically developing 8- to 12-year-old children and children with LD. We then focus on the early brainstem responses in children with LD found to show abnormal components of the rostral speech-evoked ABR (waves V and A). We found that wave I was not reliably evoked using our speech stimulus and recording parameters in either typically developing children or those with LD. Wave III was reliably evoked in the large majority of subjects in both groups and its timing did not differ between them. These data are consistent with the view that the auditory deficits in the majority of LD children with abnormal speech-evoked ABR originate from corticofugal modulation of subcortical activity.
© 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel
Related Articles:
References
- Abrams D, Nicol T, Zecker SG, Kraus N: Auditory brainstem timing predicts cerebral asymmetry for speech. J Neurosci 2006;26:11131–11137.
- Akhoun I, Gallégo S, Moulin A, Ménard M, Veuillet E, Berger-Vachon C, Collet L, Thai-Van H: The temporal relationship between speech auditory brainstem responses and the acoustic pattern of the phoneme /ba/ in normal-hearing adults. Clin Neurophysiol 2008;119:922–933.
- Baldeweg T, Richardson A, Watkins S, Foale C, Gruzelier J: Impaired auditory frequency discrimination in dyslexia detected with mismatch evoked potentials. Ann Neurol 1999;45:495–503.
- Banai K, Nicol T, Zecker SG, Kraus N: Brainstem timing: implications for cortical processing and literacy. J Neurosci 2005;25:9850–9857.
- Bishop D: Using mismatch negativity to study central auditory processing in developmental language and literacy impairments: where are we, and where should we be going? Psychol Bull 2007;133:651–672.
-
Brown L, Sherbenou RJ, Johnsen SK: Test of Nonverbal Intelligence: A Language-Free Measure of Cognitive Ability, ed 3. Austen, PRO-ED, Inc, 1997.
- Chandrasekaran B, Krishnan A, Gandour JT: Experience-dependent neural plasticity is sensitive to shape of pitch contours. Neuroreport 2007;18:1963–1967.
- Cunningham J, Nicol T, Zecker SG, Bradlow A, Kraus N: Neurobiologic responses to speech in noise in children with learning problems: deficits and strategies for improvement. Clin Neurophysiol 2001;112:758–767.
- Dean I, Harper NS, McAlpine D: Neural population coding of sound level adapts to stimulus statistics. Nat Neurosci 2005;8:1684–1689.
- Ene FA, Kalmbach A, Kandler K: Metabotropic glutamate receptors in the lateral superior olive activate TRP-like channels: age- and experience-dependent regulation. J Neurophysiol 2007;97:3365–3375.
- Escabi MA, Miller LM, Read HL, Schreiner CE: Naturalistic auditory contrast improves spectrotemporal coding in the cat inferior colliculus. J Neurosci 2003;23:11489–11504.
- Galbraith G, Amaya E, Rivera JD, Donan N, Duong M, Hsu J, Tran K, Tsang L: Brain stem evoked response to forward and reversed speech in humans. Neuroreport 2004;15:2057–2060.
-
Gorga M, Abbas P, Worthington D: Stimulus calibration in ABR measurements; in Jacobsen J (ed): The Auditory Brainstem Response. San Diego, College Hill Press, 1985, pp 49–62.
- Grøntved A, Walter B, Grønborg A: Normal ABR’s in dyslexic children. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 1988;449:171–173.
-
Hall JW: Handbook of Auditory Evoked Responses. Needham Heights, Allyn and Bacon, 1992.
- He J: Corticofugal modulation of the auditory thalamus. Exp Brain Res 2003;153:579–590.
-
Hood LJ: Clinical Applications of the Auditory Brainstem Response. San Diego, Singular Publishing Group, Inc, 1998.
-
Hyde M: The effect of cochlear lesions in the ABR; in Jacobsen J (ed): The Auditory Brainstem Response. San Diego, College Hill Press, 1985, pp 133–146.
- Jerger S, Martin RC, Jerger J: Specific auditory perceptual dysfunction in a learning disabled child. Ear Hear 1987;8:78–86.
- Johnson KL, Nicol T, Kraus N: The brainstem response to speech: a biological marker of auditory processing. Ear Hear 2005;26:424–434.
- Johnson KL, Nicol TG, Zecker SG, Kraus N: Auditory brainstem correlates of perceptual timing deficits. J Cogn Neurosci 2007;19:376–385.
- Johnson KL, Nicol T, Zecker SG, Kraus N: Developmental plasticity in the human auditory brainstem. J Neurosci 2008;28:4000–4007.
- Khalfa S, Bougeard R, Morand N, Veuillet E, Isnard J, Guenot M, Ryvlin P, Fischer C, Collet L: Evidence of peripheral auditory activity modulation by the auditory cortex in humans. Neuroscience 2001;104:347–358.
- King C, Warrier CM, Hayes E, Kraus N: Deficits in auditory brainstem pathway encoding of speech sounds in children with learning problems. Neurosci Lett 2002;319:111–115.
- Kraus N, McGee TJ, Carrell TD, Zecker SG, Nicol TG, Koch DB: Auditory neurophysiologic responses and discrimination deficits in children with learning problems. Science 1996;273:971–973.
- Krishnan A: Human frequency-following responses: representation of steady-state synthetic vowels. Hear Res 2002;166:192–201.
- Krishnan A, Xu Y, Gandour J, Cariani P: Encoding of pitch in the human brainstem is sensitive to language experience. Cogn Brain Res 2005;25:161–168.
- Kujala T, Lovio R, Lepisto T, Laasonen M, Naatanen R: Evaluation of multi-attribute auditory discrimination in dyslexia with the mismatch negativity. Clin Neurophysiol 2006;117:885–893.
- Lachmann T, Berti S, Kujala T, Schroger E: Diagnostic subgroups of developmental dyslexia have different deficits in neural processing of tones and phonemes. Int J Psychophysiol 2005;56:105–120.
- Leake PA, Hradek GT, Chair L, Snyder RL: Neonatal deafness results in degraded topographic specificity of auditory nerve projections to the cochlear nucleus in cats. J Comp Neurol 2006;497:13–31.
-
Lynn G, Verma N: ABR in upper brainstem lesions; in Jacobsen J (ed): The Auditory Brainstem Response. San Diego, College Press Hill, 1985, pp 203–217.
- Marler JA, Champlin CA: Sensory processing of backward-masking signals in children with language-learning impairment as assessed with the auditory brainstem response. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2005;48:189–203.
- Mason SM, Mellor DH: Brain-stem, middle latency and late cortical evoked potentials in children with speech and language disorders. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1984;59:297–309.
- Maye J, Werker JF, Gerken L: Infant sensitivity to distributional information can affect phonetic discrimination. Cognition 2002;82:B101–B111.
-
Møller A, Jannetta P: Neural generators of the auditory brainstem response; in Jacobson J (ed): The Auditory Brainstem Response. San Diego, College-Hill Press, 1985, pp 13–32.
- Musacchia G, Sams M, Skoe E, Kraus N: Musicians have enhanced subcortical auditory and audiovisual processing of speech and music. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007;104:15894–15898.
- Nagarajan S, Mahncke H, Salz T, Tallal P, Roberts T, Merzenich MM: Cortical auditory signal processing in poor readers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999;96:6483–6488.
- Palmer AR, Hall DA, Sumner C, Barrett DJ, Jones S, Nakamoto K, Moore DR: Some investigations into non-passive listening. Hear Res 2007;229:148–157.
- Paul I, Bott C, Heim S, Eulitz C, Elbert T: Reduced hemispheric asymmetry of the auditory N260m in dyslexia. Neuropsychologia 2006;44:785–794.
- Perez-Gonzalez D, Malmierca MS, Covey E: Novelty detector neurons in the mammalian auditory midbrain. Eur J Neurosci 2005;22:2879–2885.
- Perrot X, Ryvlin P, Isnard J, Guenot M, Catenoix H, Fischer C, Mauguiere F, Collet L: Evidence for corticofugal modulation of peripheral auditory activity in humans. Cereb Cortex 2006;16:941–948.
- Popelar J, Mazelova J, Syka J: Effects of electrical stimulation of the inferior colliculus on 2f1–f2 distortion product otoacoustic emissions in anesthetized guinea pigs. Hear Res 2002;170:116–126.
- Popelar J, Nwabueze-Ogbo FC, Syka J: Changes in neuronal activity of the inferior colliculus in rat after temporal inactivation of the auditory cortex. Physiol Res 2003;52:615–628.
- Russo N, Nicol T, Musacchia G, Kraus N: Brainstem responses to speech syllables. Clin Neurophysiol 2004;115:2021–2030.
- Russo NM, Nicol TG, Zecker SG, Hayes EA, Kraus N: Auditory training improves neural timing in the human brainstem. Behav Brain Res 2005;156:95–103.
- Saffran JR: Words in a sea of sounds: the output of infant statistical learning. Cognition 2001;81:149–169.
- Seidl AH, Grothe B: Development of sound localization mechanisms in the mongolian gerbil is shaped by early acoustic experience. J Neurophysiol 2005;94:1028–1036.
-
Snow CE, Burns S, Griffin P: Preventing Reading Difficulties in Young Children. Washington, National Academy Press, 1998.
- Song JH, Banai K, Russo NM, Kraus N: On the relationship between speech- and nonspeech-evoked auditory brainstem responses. Audiol Neurootol 2006;11:233–241.
-
Song JH, Skoe E, Wong PCM, Kraus N: Plasticity in the adult human auditory brainstem following short-term linguistic training. J Cogn Neurosci 2008, E-pub ahead of print.
- Sun X, Xia Q, Lai CH, Shum DK, Chan YS, He J: Corticofugal modulation of acoustically induced Fos expression in the rat auditory pathway. J Comp Neurol 2007;501:509–525.
- Tait CA, Roush J, Johns J: Normal ABR’s in children classified as learning disabled. J Aud Res 1983;23:56–62.
-
Veuillet E, Collet L, Bazin F: Objective evidence of peripheral auditory disorders in learning-impaired children. J Audiol Med 1999;8:18–29.
-
Wagner R, Torgensen J, Rashotte C: Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing. Austin, PRO-ED, Inc, 1999.
- Wible B, Nicol T, Kraus N: Atypical brainstem representation of onset and formant structure of speech sounds in children with language-based learning problems. Biol Psychol 2004;67:299–317.
- Wible B, Nicol T, Kraus N: Correlation between brainstem and cortical auditory processes in normal and language-impaired children. Brain 2005;128:417–423.
-
Wilkinson G: Wide Range Achievement Test 3. Wilmington, Jastak, 1993.
- Winer JA: Decoding the auditory corticofugal systems. Hear Res 2006;212:1–8.
- Wong PCM, Skoe E, Russo NM, Dees T, Kraus N: Musical experience shapes human brainstem encoding of linguistic pitch patterns. Nat Neurosci 2007;10:420–422.
-
Woodcock R, Johnson M: Woodcock-Johnson Psychoeducational Battery – Revised. Allen, DLM Teach Resources, 1989.
- Wright BA, Lombardino LJ, King WM, Puranik CS, Leonard CM, Merzenich MM: Deficits in auditory temporal and spectral resolution in language-impaired children. Nature 1997;387:176–178.
- Yan J, Ehret G: Corticofugal modulation of midbrain sound processing in the house mouse. Eur J Neurosci 2002;16:119–128.
Article / Publication Details
Received: October 05, 2007
Accepted: February 01, 2008
Published online: May 19, 2008
Issue release date: July 2008
Number of Print Pages: 10
Number of Figures: 4
Number of Tables: 4
ISSN: 1420-3030 (Print)
eISSN: 1421-9700 (Online)
For additional information: https://www.karger.com/AUD
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

Get Permission