Cytogenetic and Genome Research

Original Article

Nocodazole sensitivity, age-related aneuploidy, and alterations in the cell cycle during maturation of mouse oocytes

Eichenlaub-Ritter U. · Boll I.

Author affiliations

Lehrstuhl Gentechnologie/Mikrobiologie, Fakultät für Biologie, Universität Bielefeld, Bielefeld (FRG)

Related Articles for ""

Cytogenet Cell Genet 1989;52:170–176

Log in to MyKarger to check if you already have access to this content.


Buy

  • FullText & PDF
  • Unlimited re-access via MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

CHF 38.00 *
EUR 35.00 *
USD 39.00 *

Select

KAB

Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!


If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.


Save over 20% compared to the individual article price.

Learn more

Rent/Cloud

  • Rent for 48h to view
  • Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
  • Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
  • Printing and saving restrictions apply

Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00

Select

Subscribe

  • Access to all articles of the subscribed year(s) guaranteed for 5 years
  • Unlimited re-access via Subscriber Login or MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

Subcription rates


Select
* The final prices may differ from the prices shown due to specifics of VAT rules.

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Original Article

Accepted: June 16, 1989
Published online: May 13, 2008
Issue release date: 1989

Number of Print Pages: 7
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 0

ISSN: 1424-8581 (Print)
eISSN: 1424-859X (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/CGR

Abstract

To detect age-related alterations in the formation and function of the spindle apparatus, we examined in vitro maturing oocytes obtained from young (2–4 mo) and aged (> 9 mo) diestrous CBA/Ca mice. Observation of cells processed for antitubulin immunofluorescence revealed that oocytes from aged females progress faster through first maturation division than those from young animals. They are also more prone to nondisjunction, as shown by a significantly higher level of aneuploidy in C-banded cells arrested at metaphase II. The ability of oocytes to recover from treatment with a microtubule inhibitor, nocodazole, and the effect of the drug on spindle integrity and chromosome segregation were also studied. In both age groups, treatment of metaphase I oocytes with 10 µM nocodazole caused rapid and complete microtubule depolymerization and chromosome scattering. Upon recovery, oocytes from both age groups were able to reestablish a spindle apparatus, proceed through anaphase, and extrude a first polar body. However, nocodazole treatment led to a dramatic increase of aneuploidy. Unexpectedly, the relative rise in hyperploids was greater in oocytes from young mice than in those from aged mice, so that the absolute percentage of hyperploid metaphase II cells was similar in both age groups after drug treatment. Concomitantly, nocodazole exposure abolished or, at least, diminished intrinsic differences in the cell cycle and anaphase trigger present in the controls (e.g., the earlier onset of chromosome separation in oocytes from aged females). It shortened the period available for spindle formation before chromosome segregation in all oocytes. Therefore, our study implies that temporal differences in the progression of oocytes through maturation, in particular, the shortening of the time available for alignment of bivalents before chromosome separation occurs in oocytes of old females, are mainly responsible for age-related rises in aneuploidy. There is no indication that (1) the spindle apparatus of oocytes from aged mammals is more labile or susceptible to disturbances than the spindle apparatus of oocytes from young individuals or that (2) an increase in the number of univalents makes oocytes from aged mammals particularly prone to nondisjunction.

© 1989 S. Karger AG, Basel




Related Articles:


Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Original Article

Accepted: June 16, 1989
Published online: May 13, 2008
Issue release date: 1989

Number of Print Pages: 7
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 0

ISSN: 1424-8581 (Print)
eISSN: 1424-859X (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/CGR


Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
TOP