Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Resuscitation of Newborn Infants with 21% or 100% Oxygen: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisSaugstad O.D.a · Ramji S.b · Soll R.F.c · Vento M.d
aDepartment of Paediatric Research, Rikshospitalet Medical Centre, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; bDepartment of Paediatrics, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India; cDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, Vt., USA; dServicio de Neonatologia, Hospital Universitario Materno-Infantil, La Fe, Valencia, Spain
Do you have an account?
- Rent for 48h to view
- Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
- Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
- Printing and saving restrictions apply
Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00
Background: The issue of whether 21% O2 is more effective than 100% O2 for resuscitation of newborn infants remains controversial. Objectives: We have updated the systematic review and meta-analysis including all studies reporting resuscitation of newborn infants with 21 or 100% O2. Methods: Randomized or quasi-randomized studies of depressed newborn infants resuscitated with 21 or 100% O2 with or without masking of treatment were considered for inclusion. The outcomes of interest included neonatal mortality and hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy. Results: Ten studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Of these, 6 studies were identified as being strictly randomized. In total, 1,082 infants were allocated to resuscitation with 21% O2 and 1,051 infants with 100% O2. The risk of neonatal mortality was reduced in the 21% O2 group compared to the 100% O2 group both in the analysis of all studies (typical RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.54, 0.88) and in the analysis of strictly randomized studies (typical RR 0.32, 95% CI 0.12, 0.84). A trend toward a decrease in the risk of hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy stage 2 and 3 was noted with resuscitation in 21% O2 in the analysis of all studies (typical RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.72, 1.08). Conclusions: There is a significant reduction in the risk of neonatal mortality and a trend towards a reduction in the risk of severe hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy in newborns resuscitated with 21% O2.
© 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel
- Saugstad OD: Optimal oxygenation at birth and in the neonatal period. Neonatology 2007;91:319–322.
Tan A, Schulze A, O’Donnell CP, Davis PG: Air versus oxygen for resuscitation of infants at birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005;2:CD002273.
- Saugstad OD, S Ramji S, Vento M: Resuscitation of depressed newborn infants with ambient air or pure oxygen: a meta-analysis. Biol Neonate 2005;87:27–34.
- Davis PG, Tan A, O’Donnell CP, Schulze A: Resuscitation of newborn infants with 100% oxygen or air: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2004;364:1329–1333.
- Rabi Y, Rabi D, Yee W: Room air resuscitation of the depressed newborn: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Resuscitation 2007;72:353–363.
Zhu JJ, Wu MY: [Which is better to resuscitate asphyxiated newborn infants: room air or pure oxygen?] in Chinese. Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi 2007;45:644–649.
- Ramji S, Ahuja S, Thirupuram S, Rootwelt T, Rooth G, Saugstad OD: Resuscitation of asphyxic newborn infants with room air or 100% oxygen. Pediatr Res 1993;34:809–812.
- Saugstad OD, Rootwelt T, Aalen O: Resuscitation of asphyxiated newborn infants with room air or oxygen: an international controlled trial. The Resair 2 study. Pediatrics 1998;102:e1.
- Vento M, Asensi M, Sastre J, Garcia-Sala F, Vina J: Six years of experience with the use of room air for the resuscitation of asphyxiated newly born term infants. Biol Neonate 2001;79:261–267.
- Vento M, Asensi M, Sastre J, Lloret A, Garcia-Sala F, Vina J: Oxidative stress in asphyxiated term infants resuscitated with 100% oxygen. J Pediatr 2003;142:240–246. Erratum in: J Pediatr 2003;142:616.
- Ramji S, Rasaily R, Mishra PK, Narang A, Jayam S, Kapoor AN, Kambo I, Mathur A, Saxena BN: Resuscitation of asphyxiated newborns with room air or 100% oxygen at birth: a multicentric clinical trial. Indian Pediatr 2003;40:510–517.
The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation: The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) Consensus on Science with treatment recommendations for pediatric and neonatal patients: pediatric basic and advanced life support. Pediatrics 2006;117:e955–e977.
- Vento M, Sastre J, Asensi MA, Vina J: Room-air resuscitation causes less damage to heart and kidney than 100% oxygen. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2005;172:1393–1398.
- Bajaj N, Udani RH, Nanavati RN: Room air vs. 100 per cent oxygen for neonatal resuscitation: a controlled clinical trial. J Trop Pediatr 2005;51:206–211.
Toma AI, Nanea M, Scheiner M, Mitu R, Petrescu I, Matu E: Efectele gazului folosit pentru reanimarea nou-nascutului asupra hemodinamicii post-resuscitare (article in Romanian, abstract in English); in: Asfixia Perinatala. Primul Congres National de Neonatologie cu Participare Internationala, Cluj, 2006, Ed. Medicala Universitara ‘Iuliu Hatieganu’, pp 34–44.
Toma AI, Sarbu A, Popescu O, Mitu A, Dobrescu M: Room air versus oxygen in the resuscitation of term infants. E-PAS 2006;59:2860.201.
Toma AI, Albu DF, Dambenau IM, Constantinescu A, Nanea M, Scheiner M, Vamescu B, Lancu M, Ghinea R: 21% versus 100% Oxygen in the Resuscitation of Term Infants. Prague, ESPR, 2007, abstract.
- Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJM, Gavaghan DJ, McQuay HJ: Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 1996;17:1–12.
- Sarnat HB, Sarnat MS: Neonatal encephalopathy following fetal distress. A clinical and electroencephalographic study. Arch Neurol 1976;33:696–705.
- Saugstad OD, Ramji S, Irani SF, El-Meneza S, Hernandez EA, Vento M, Talvik T, Solberg R, Rootwelt T, Aalen OO: Resuscitation of newborn infants with 21% or 100% oxygen: follow-up at 18 to 24 months. Pediatrics 2003;112:296–300.
Niermeyer S, Kattwinkel J, Van Reempts P, Nadkarni V, Phillips B, Zideman D, et al: International Guidelines for Neonatal Resuscitation: an excerpt from the Guidelines 2000 for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care: International Consensus on Science. Contributors and Reviewers for the Neonatal Resuscitation Guidelines. Pediatrics 2000;106:E29.
- Naumburg E, Bellocco R, Cnattingius S, Jonzon A, Ekbom A: Supplementary oxygen and risk of childhood lymphatic leukaemia. Acta Paediatr 2002;91:1328–1333.
- Spector LG, Klebanoff MA, Feusner JH, Georgieff MK, Ross JA: Childhood cancer following neonatal oxygen supplementation. J Pediatr 2005;147:27–31.
- Paneth N: The evidence mounts against use of pure oxygen in newborn resuscitation. J Pediatr 2005;147:4–6.
- Saugstad OD, Ramji S, Rootwelt T, Vento M: Response to resuscitation of the newborn: early prognostic variables. Acta Paediatr 2005;94:890–895.
- Saugstad OD, Ramji S, Vento M: Oxygen for newborn resuscitation: how much is enough? Pediatrics 2006;118:789–792.
Canadian Paediatric Society: Recommendations for specific treatment modifications in the Canadian context: Addendum to the 2006 NRP Provider Textbook. Canadian Paediatric Society, 2006, 9–9–0007.
Australian Resuscitation Council: Guideline 13.1: Introduction to Resuscitation of the Newborn Infant, 2006. http://www.resus.org.au.
- Hellström-Westas L, Forsblad K, Sjörs K, Saugstad OD, Björklund L, Maršál K, Källén K: Earlier Apgar score increase in severely depressed term infants cared for in Swedish level III units with 40% versus 100% oxygen resuscitation strategies: population based register study. Pediatrics 2006;118:e1798–e1804.
- Escrig R, Arruza L, Izquierdo I, Villar G, Saenz P, Gimeno A, Moro M, Vento M: Achievement of targeted saturation values in extremely low gestational age neonates resuscitated with low or high oxygen concentrations: a prospective, randomized trial. Pediatrics 2008;121:875–881.
Article / Publication Details
Copyright / Drug Dosage / DisclaimerCopyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.