Login to MyKarger

New to MyKarger? Click here to sign up.

Login with Facebook

Forgot your password?

Authors, Editors, Reviewers

For Manuscript Submission, Check or Review Login please go to Submission Websites List.

Submission Websites List

Institutional Login
(Shibboleth or Open Athens)

For the academic login, please select your country in the dropdown list. You will be redirected to verify your credentials.

Original Paper

Free Access

Developmental and Genetic Regulation of Human Surfactant Protein B in vivo

Hamvas A.a · Heins H.B.a · Guttentag S.H.d · Wegner D.J.a · Trusgnich M.A.a · Bennet K.W.a · Yang P.a · Carlson C.S.c · An P.b · Cole F.S.a

Author affiliations

aDivision of Newborn Medicine, the Edward Mallinckrodt Department of Pediatrics and St. Louis Children’s Hospital, bDivision of Statistical Genomics, Department of Genetics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Mo., cDivision of Public Health Sciences, the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash., and dDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa., USA

Corresponding Author

Aaron Hamvas, MD

Division of Newborn Medicine, St. Louis Children’s Hospital

One Children’s Place

St. Louis, MO 63110 (USA)

Tel. +1 314 454 6148, Fax +1 314 454 4633, E-Mail hamvas@kids.wustl.edu

Related Articles for ""

Neonatology 2009;95:117–124

Do you have an account?

Login Information

Contact Information

I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.


Background: Genetic and developmental disruption of surfactant protein B (SP-B) expression causes neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). Objectives: To assess developmental and genetic regulation of SP-B expression in vivo. Methods: To evaluate in vivo developmental regulation of SP-B, we used immunoblotting to compare frequency of detection of mature and pro-SP-B peptides in developmentally distinct cohorts: 24 amniotic fluid samples, unfractionated tracheal aspirates from 101 infants ≥34 weeks’ gestation with (75) and without (26) neonatal RDS, and 6 nonsmoking adults. To examine genetic regulation, we used univariate and logistic regression analyses to detect associations between common SP-B (SFTPB) genotypes and SP-B peptides in the neonatal RDS cohort. Results: We found pro-SP-B peptides in 24/24 amniotic fluid samples and in 100/101 tracheal aspirates from newborn infants but none in bronchoalveolar lavage from normal adults (0/6) (p < 0.001). We detected an association (p = 0.0011) between pro-SP-B peptides (Mr 40 and 42 kDa) and genotype of a nonsynonymous single nucleotide polymorphism at genomic position 1580 that regulates amino-terminus glycosylation. Conclusions: Pro-SP-B peptides are more common in developmentally less mature humans. Association of genotype at genomic position 1580 with pro-SP-B peptides (Mr 40 and 42 kDa) suggests genetic regulation of amino terminus glycosylation in vivo.

© 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Original Paper

Received: December 06, 2007
Accepted: January 21, 2008
Published online: September 06, 2008
Issue release date: February 2009

Number of Print Pages: 8
Number of Figures: 3
Number of Tables: 5

ISSN: 1661-7800 (Print)
eISSN: 1661-7819 (Online)

For additional information: http://www.karger.com/NEO

Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.