Login to MyKarger

New to MyKarger? Click here to sign up.



Login with Facebook

Forgot your password?

Authors, Editors, Reviewers

For Manuscript Submission, Check or Review Login please go to Submission Websites List.

Submission Websites List

Institutional Login
(Shibboleth or Open Athens)

For the academic login, please select your country in the dropdown list. You will be redirected to verify your credentials.

Increased Accuracy of Fetal Weight Estimation with a Gender-Specific Weight Formula

Siemer J.a · Wolf T.b · Hart N.a · Schrauder M.b · Meurer B.b · Goecker T.b · Beckmann M.W.b · Schild R.L.b

Author affiliations

Departments of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals,aMannheim, and bErlangen, Germany

Related Articles for ""

Fetal Diagn Ther 2008;24:321–326

Do you have an account?

Login Information





Contact Information












By signing up for MyKarger you will automatically participate in our year-End raffle.
If you Then Do Not wish To participate, please uncheck the following box.

Yes, I wish To participate In the year-End raffle And Get the chance To win some Of our most interesting books, And other attractive prizes.


I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.



Login Information





Contact Information












By signing up for MyKarger you will automatically participate in our year-End raffle.
If you Then Do Not wish To participate, please uncheck the following box.

Yes, I wish To participate In the year-End raffle And Get the chance To win some Of our most interesting books, And other attractive prizes.


I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.



To view the fulltext, please log in

To view the pdf, please log in

Buy

  • FullText & PDF
  • Unlimited re-access via MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

CHF 38.00 *
EUR 35.00 *
USD 39.00 *

Select

KAB

Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!

If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.


Save over 20% compared to the individual article price.
Learn more

Rent/Cloud

  • Rent for 48h to view
  • Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
  • Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
  • Printing and saving restrictions apply

Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00


Select

Subscribe

  • Access to all articles of the subscribed year(s) guaranteed for 5 years
  • Unlimited re-access via Subscriber Login or MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

Subcription rates


Select

* The final prices may differ from the prices shown due to specifics of VAT rules.

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Paper

Received: May 09, 2007
Accepted: July 09, 2007
Published online: October 06, 2008
Issue release date: January 2009

Number of Print Pages: 6
Number of Figures: 2
Number of Tables: 6

ISSN: 1015-3837 (Print)
eISSN: 1421-9964 (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/FDT

Abstract

Objective: To test whether Schild’s sex-specific formula for estimating fetal weight is more accurate than commonly used regression formulae. Methods: The gender-specific formula and 10 widely used equations were evaluated in a group of 989 pregnancies. Each fetus underwent ultrasound examination with complete biometric parameters within 7 days before delivery. Results: Over the whole weight range and in the subgroup of newborns with a birth weight between 2,500 and 3,999 g, the sex-specific weight formula from Schild demonstrated the best level of accuracy. For infants with a birth weight of less than 2,500 g as well as for macrosomic newborns, the gender-specific formula did not improve fetal weight estimation. Conclusion: In pregnancies where fetal gender is known, Schild’s regression formula should be used when fetal weight lies within the range of 2,500–3,999 g.

© 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel


References

  1. Kurmanavicius J, Burkhardt T, Wisser J, Huch R: Ultrasonographic fetal weight estimation: accuracy of formulas and accuracy of examiners by birth weight from 500 to 5,000 g. J Perinat Med 2004;32:155–161.
  2. Dudley NJ: A systematic review of the ultrasound estimation of fetal weight. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005;25:80–89.
  3. Schild RL, Sachs C, Fimmers R, Gembruch U, Hansmann M: Sex-specific fetal weight prediction by ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004;23:30–35.
  4. Kurmanavicius J, Wright EM, Royston P, Wisser J, Huch R, Huch A, Zimmermann R: Fetal ultrasound biometry. 1. Head reference values. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1999;106:126–135.
  5. Kurmanavicius J, Wright EM, Royston P, Zimmermann R, Huch R, Huch A, Wisser J: Fetal ultrasound biometry. 2. Abdomen and femur length reference values. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1999;106:136–143.
  6. Bland JM, Altman DG: Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; i:307–310.
  7. Chien PF, Owen P, Khan KS: Validity of ultrasound estimation of fetal weight. Obstet Gynecol 2000;95:856–860.
  8. Mongelli M, Gardosi J: Gestation-adjusted projection of estimated fetal weight. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1996;75:28–31.
  9. Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Sharman RS, Deter RL, Park SK: Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements – a prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985;151:333–337.
  10. Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Carpenter RJ, Deter RL, Park SK: Sonographic estimation of fetal weight: the value of femur length in addition to head and abdomen measurements. Radiology 1984;150:535–540.
  11. Hansmann M, Schumacher H, Voigt U: Mehrparametrische nicht lineare Gewichtsschätzung mittels Ultraschall unter Berücksichtigung des Gestationsalters; in Kratochwil A, Reinold E (eds): Ultraschalldiagnostik. Stuttgart, Georg Thieme Verlag, 1978, pp 69–71.
  12. Merz E, Lieser H, Schicketanz KH, Harle J: Intrauterine fetal weight assessment using ultrasound: a comparison of several weight assessment methods and development of a new formula for the determination of fetal weight. Ultraschall Med 1988;9:15–24.
  13. Warsof SL, Gohari P, Berkowitz RL, Hobbins JC: The estimation of fetal weight by computer-assisted analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1977;128:881–892.
  14. Campbell S, Wilkin D: Ultrasonic measurement of fetal abdomen circumference in the estimation of fetal weight. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1975;82:689–697.
  15. Shepard MJ, Richards VA, Berkowitz RL, Warsof SL, Hobbins JC: An evaluation of two equations for predicting fetal weight by ultrasound. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982;142:47–54.

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Paper

Received: May 09, 2007
Accepted: July 09, 2007
Published online: October 06, 2008
Issue release date: January 2009

Number of Print Pages: 6
Number of Figures: 2
Number of Tables: 6

ISSN: 1015-3837 (Print)
eISSN: 1421-9964 (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/FDT


Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.