American Journal of Nephrology

Clinical Study

Improvement in Prognosis of Patients with Acute Renal Failure over a Period of 15 Years: An Analysis of 710 Cases in a Dialysis Center

Biesenbach G.a · Zazgornik J.a · Kaiser W.a · Grafinger P.a · Stuby U.a · Necek S.b

Author affiliations

aDivision Nephrology and Dialysis, 2nd Department of Medicine, and bDepartment of Anesthesia, General Hospital Linz, Austria

Related Articles for ""

Am J Nephrol 1992;12:319–325

Log in to MyKarger to check if you already have access to this content.


Buy

  • FullText & PDF
  • Unlimited re-access via MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

CHF 38.00 *
EUR 35.00 *
USD 39.00 *

Select

KAB

Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!


If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.


Save over 20% compared to the individual article price.

Learn more

Rent/Cloud

  • Rent for 48h to view
  • Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
  • Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
  • Printing and saving restrictions apply

Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00

Select

Subscribe

  • Access to all articles of the subscribed year(s) guaranteed for 5 years
  • Unlimited re-access via Subscriber Login or MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

Subcription rates


Select
* The final prices may differ from the prices shown due to specifics of VAT rules.

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Clinical Study

Received: October 07, 1991
Accepted: July 21, 1992
Published online: October 28, 2008
Issue release date: 1992

Number of Print Pages: 7
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 0

ISSN: 0250-8095 (Print)
eISSN: 1421-9670 (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/AJN

Abstract

In order to evaluate the changes in causes and outcome of acute renal failure (ARF) during the years 1975-1989, 710 patients treated in our dialysis center were analyzed. We compared the etiology, the severity and catabolic state of ARF, the techniques of renal replacement therapy, which were employed and the ages and mortality rates of these patients, who received dialysis therapy during the years 1975-79 (n = 227), 1980-84 (n = 240) and 1985-89 (n = 243). The number of postoperative, posttraumatic and non-traumatic cases of ARF was approximately the same in all three 5-year periods, only the frequency of postrenal failure decreased from 7% in the years 1975-79 to 3% in the years 1985-89. The incidence of sepsis as a major cause of ARF and the most important risk factor was comparably high in the surgical and medical patients during all of the periods, but it increased in the traumatic patients from 7 % in the years 1975-79 to 28 % during the last 5-year period. The prevalence of respiratory failure and jaundice as additional organ failures, the severity of ARF (oligonanuric-nonoliguric) and the metabolic state were not different in the three patient groups. The magnitude of rise in serum creatinine before the start of renal replacement therapy was significant lower in the last 5-year period in comparison to the years 1975-79 (p < 0.05). Hemodialysis was the treatment in choice of 98 and 93 % of the cases during the first two periods, respectively. Since 1980, bicarbonate was employed in the dialysis instead of acetate in the most cases. In the years 1985-89, hemodialysis was only performed in 51 % of the patients, intermittent or continuous hemofiltration was used in 49%. The mortality of all the patients was reduced from 69% in the years 1975-79 to 54 and 48%, respectively, in the last two 5-year periods (p < 0.01), though the mean age of the patients has increased from 44 (9-84) to 57 (10-84) and 58 years (15-90), respectively. This improvement in outcome has been demonstrated in surgical and traumatic as well as nontraumatic and postrenal failure.

© 1992 S. Karger AG, Basel




Related Articles:


Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Clinical Study

Received: October 07, 1991
Accepted: July 21, 1992
Published online: October 28, 2008
Issue release date: 1992

Number of Print Pages: 7
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 0

ISSN: 0250-8095 (Print)
eISSN: 1421-9670 (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/AJN


Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
TOP