Cardiology
Influence of Ventricular Conduction Defects on Ventricular Repolarisation and Coupling Intervals of Ventricular ExtrasystolesTalbot S.Sheffield Royal Infirmary, Sheffield
|
|
Log in to MyKarger to check if you already have access to this content.
KAB
Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!
If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.
Save over 20% compared to the individual article price.
Article / Publication Details
Published online: October 29, 2008
Issue release date: 1976
Number of Print Pages: 7
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 0
ISSN: 0008-6312 (Print)
eISSN: 1421-9751 (Online)
For additional information: https://www.karger.com/CRD
Abstract
In all conduction disorders of the left ventricle the Q-T interval is prolonged in relation to the prolongation of the QRS duration, but the S-T interval (measured from the end of the S wave) is within normal limits. Right ventricular conduction defects are associated with prolongation of the Q-T interval, but the S-T interval in incomplete and complete right bundle branch block is subnormal. In the absence of a broad QRS, the Q-T and S-T intervals are not prolonged in left anterior hemiblock. However, an associated non-specific left intraventricular conduction defect or right bundle branch block does prolong the QRS and thus the Q-T interval. The S-T interval is normal or subnormal in the presence of right bundle branch block and left anterior hemiblock confirming that left anterior hemiblock does not affect the Q-T interval and repolarisation. In the presence of any conduction defect which prolongs the QRS duration, extrasystoles have longer coupling intervals. The coupling intervals are longer in the presence of left bundle branch block than right bundle branch block. It is postulated that this is due to the differences in the time of depolarisation and thus repolarisation of the left ventricle.
© 1976 S. Karger AG, Basel
Related Articles:
Article / Publication Details
Published online: October 29, 2008
Issue release date: 1976
Number of Print Pages: 7
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 0
ISSN: 0008-6312 (Print)
eISSN: 1421-9751 (Online)
For additional information: https://www.karger.com/CRD
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

Get Permission