Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders

Original Research Article

Detection of Dementia in Primary Care: The Linköping Study

Ólafsdóttir M.a · Skoog I.c · Marcusson J.b

Author affiliations

Departments of aMedicine and Care, Primary Care, and bGeriatric Medicine, The Health University of Linköping, and cDepartment of Psychiatry, Institute of Clinical Neuroscience, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden

Related Articles for ""

Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2000;11:223–229

Log in to MyKarger to check if you already have access to this content.


Buy

  • FullText & PDF
  • Unlimited re-access via MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

CHF 38.00 *
EUR 35.00 *
USD 39.00 *

Select

KAB

Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!


If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.


Save over 20% compared to the individual article price.

Learn more

Rent/Cloud

  • Rent for 48h to view
  • Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
  • Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
  • Printing and saving restrictions apply

Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00

Select

Subscribe

  • Access to all articles of the subscribed year(s) guaranteed for 5 years
  • Unlimited re-access via Subscriber Login or MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

Subcription rates


Select
* The final prices may differ from the prices shown due to specifics of VAT rules.

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Original Research Article

Published online: June 21, 2000
Issue release date: July – August

Number of Print Pages: 7
Number of Figures: 1
Number of Tables: 3

ISSN: 1420-8008 (Print)
eISSN: 1421-9824 (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/DEM

Abstract

We examined to what extent dementia and cognitive impairment are detected in a primary health care centre. A systematic sample of patients aged 70 years and above, who attended a primary health care centre for a doctor’s consultation (n = 350) were examined with a neuropsychiatric examination and an interview with a close informant. Dementia was diagnosed according to DSM-III-R. Medical records from the health centre were examined for entries on cognitive decline or dementia, other diagnoses and prescribed drugs. The prevalence of dementia was 16.3% and a further 3.1% had questionable dementia. Cognitive disturbances or dementia were noted in case records in 15 out of 57 (26%) demented cases, and in 1 out of 11 (9%) questionable dementias. Compared to non-demented patients, the demented had more diagnoses and a higher number of prescribed drugs. Severity and duration of dementia were associated with an increased detection.

© 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel




Related Articles:


References

  1. Jorm A: The Epidemiology of Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Disorders. London, Chapman and Hall, 1990.
  2. Fratiglioni L, Grut M, Forsell Y, et al: Prevalence of Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias in an elderly urban population: Relationship with age, sex, and education. Neurology 1991;41:1886–1892.
  3. Skoog I, Nilsson L, Palmertz B, Andreasson LA, Svanborg A: A population-based study of dementia in 85-year-olds (see comments). N Engl J Med 1993;328:153–158.
  4. Ott A, Breteler MM, van Harskamp F, et al: Prevalence of Alzheimer’s disease and vascular dementia: Association with education. The Rotterdam study. Br Med J 1995;310:970–973.
  5. Aevarsson O, Skoog I: Dementia disorders in a birth cohort followed from age 85 to 88: The influence of mortality, refusal rate, and diagnostic change on prevalence. Int Psychogeriatr 1997;9:11–23.
  6. Aevarsson O, Skoog I: A population-based study on the incidence of dementia disorders between 85 and 88 years of age. J Am Geriatr Soc 1996;44:1455–1460.
  7. Wimo A, Karlsson G, Sandman PO, Corder L, Winblad B: Cost of illness due to dementia in Sweden. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 1997;12:857–861.
  8. Writing Committee, Lancet Conference 1996: The challenge of the dementias. Lancet 1996;347:1303–1307.
  9. Olafsdottir M, Marcusson J: Diagnosis of dementia at the primary care level. Acta Neurol Scand Suppl 1996;165:58–62.
  10. Downs MG: The role of general practice and the primary care team in dementia diagnosis and management. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 1996;11:937–942.
    External Resources
  11. Stoppe G, Sandholzer H, Staedt J, et al: Diagnosis of dementia in primary care: Results of a representative survey in lower Saxony, Germany. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 1994;244:278–283.
  12. Pond CD, Mant A, Kehoe L, Hewitt H, Brodaty H: General practitioner diagnosis of depression and dementia in the elderly: Can academic detailing make a difference? Fam Pract 1994;11:141–147.
  13. Iliffe S, Mitchley S, Gould M, Haines A: Evaluation of the use of brief screening instruments for dementia, depression and problem drinking among elderly people in general practice. Br J Gen Pract 1994;44:503–507.
  14. De Lepeleire JA, Heyrman J, Baro F, Buntinx F, Lasuy C: How do general practitioners diagnose dementia? Fam Pract 1994;11:148–152.
  15. Bowers J, Jorm AF, Henderson S, Harris P: General practitioners’ detection of depression and dementia in elderly patients. Med J Aust 1990;153:192–196.
  16. Brodaty H, Clarke J, Ganguli M, et al: Screening for cognitive impairment in general practice: Toward a consensus. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 1998;12:1–13.
  17. Skoog I, Lernfelt B, Landahl S, et al: 15-year longitudinal study of blood pressure and dementia (see comments). Lancet 1996;347:1141–1145.
  18. Åsberg M, Montgomery S, Perris C, Schalling D, Sedvall G: A comprehensive psychopathological rating scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl 1978;271:5–27.
    External Resources
  19. Folstein M, Folstein S, McHugh P: ‘Mini-mental state’: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975;12:189–198.
  20. American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Washington, APA, 1987.
  21. Cohen J: A coefficient of agreement for normal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 1960;20:37–46.
  22. Altman DG: Practical Statistics for Medical Research. London, Chapman and Hall, 1991.
  23. Kirkwood BR: Essentials of Medical Statistics. Oxford, Blackwell Science, 1988.
  24. Wolf-Klein GP, Siverstone FA, Brod MS, et al: Are Alzheimer patients healthier? J Am Geriatr Soc 1988;36:219–224.
  25. Cooper B, Bickel H, Schaufele M: The ability of general practitioners to detect dementia and cognitive impairment in their elderly patients: A study in Mannheim. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 1992;7:591–598.
  26. Jorm AF: Methods of screening for dementia: A meta-analysis of studies comparing an informant questionnaire with a brief cognitive test. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 1997;11:158–162.
  27. Rothman KJ: Modern Epidemiology. Boston, Little, Brown, 1986.

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Original Research Article

Published online: June 21, 2000
Issue release date: July – August

Number of Print Pages: 7
Number of Figures: 1
Number of Tables: 3

ISSN: 1420-8008 (Print)
eISSN: 1421-9824 (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/DEM


Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
TOP