Gerontology

Regenerative and Technological Section

Free Access

Open-Ended Question: Is Immortality Exclusively Inherent to the Germline? – A Mini-Review

Lepperdinger G.

Author affiliations

Institute for Biomedical Aging Research, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Innsbruck, Austria

Corresponding Author

Günter Lepperdinger

Institute for Biomedical Aging Research, Austrian Academy of Sciences

Rennweg 10, AT–6020 Innsbruck (Austria)

Tel. +43 512 5839 1940, Fax +43 512 5839 198

E-Mail guenter.lepperdinger@oeaw.ac.at

Related Articles for ""

Gerontology 2009;55:114–117

Abstract

All somatic cells are subject to aging. Germline links generations, and thus, pluripotent germ cells are considered potentially immortal. The current understanding how the germline escapes this otherwise inevitable phenomenon is outlined in this article.

© 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel




Related Articles:


References

  1. Weismann A: Aufsätze über Vererbung und verwandte biologische Fragen. Jena, Gustav Fischer, 1892.
  2. Hayflick L, Moorhead PS: The serial cultivation of human diploid cell strains. Exp Cell Res 1961;25:585–621.
  3. Martin GR: Isolation of a pluripotent cell line from early mouse embryos cultured in medium conditioned by teratocarcinoma stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1981;78:7634–7638.
  4. Evans MJ, Kaufman MH: Establishment in culture of pluripotential cells from mouse embryos. Nature 1981;292:154–156.
  5. Briggs R, King T: Transplantation of living nuclei from blastula cells into enucleated frogs’ eggs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1952;38:455–463.
  6. Gurdon JB, Uehlinger V: ‘Fertile’ intestine nuclei. Nature 1966;210:1240–1241.
  7. Wilmut I, et al: Viable offspring derived from fetal and adult mammalian cells. Nature 1997;385:810–813.
  8. Wilmut I: Dolly – her life and legacy. Cloning Stem Cells 2003;5:99–100.
  9. Shiels PG, et al: Analysis of telomere lengths in cloned sheep. Nature 1999;399:316–317.
  10. Takahashi K, Yamanaka S: Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell 2006;126:663–676.
  11. Maherali N, et al: Directly reprogrammed fibroblasts show global epigenetic remodeling and widespread tissue contribution. Cell Stem Cell 2007;1:55–70.
  12. Jaenisch R, Young R: Stem cells, the molecular circuitry of pluripotency and nuclear reprogramming. Cell 2008;132:567–582.
  13. Okita K, Ichisaka T, Yamanaka S: Generation of germline-competent induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature 2007;448:313–317.
  14. Campisi J: Cancer and ageing: rival demons? Nat Rev Cancer 2003;3:339–349.
  15. Djahanbakhch O, Ezzati M, Zosmer A: Reproductive ageing in women. J Pathol 2007;211:219–231.
  16. Baker SJ, Spears N: The role of intra-ovarian interactions in the regulation of follicle dominance. Hum Reprod Update 1999;5:153–165.
  17. Tatone C: Oocyte senescence: a firm link to age-related female subfertility. Gynecol Endocrinol 2008;24:59–63.
  18. Garcia-Gonzalez F, Simmons LW: Sperm viability matters in insect sperm competition. Curr Biol 2005;15:271–275.
  19. Kuhnert B, Nieschlag E: Reproductive functions of the ageing male. Hum Reprod Update 2004;10:327–339.
  20. Hayashi K, de Sousa Lopes SM, Surani MA: Germ cell specification in mice. Science 2007;316:394–396.
  21. Laun P, et al: Yeast as a model for chronological and reproductive aging – a comparison. Exp Gerontol 2006;41:1208–1212.
  22. Kozubowski L, Larson JR, Tatchell K: Role of the septin ring in the asymmetric localization of proteins at the mother-bud neck in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biol Cell 2005;16:3455–3466.
  23. Gladfelter AS, Pringle JR, Lew DJ: The septin cortex at the yeast mother-bud neck. Curr Opin Microbiol 2001;4:681–689.
  24. Shcheprova Z, et al: A mechanism for asymmetric segregation of age during yeast budding. Nature 2008;454:728–734.
  25. Cairns J: Mutation selection and the natural history of cancer. Nature 1975;255:197–200.
  26. Smith GH: Label-retaining epithelial cells in mouse mammary gland divide asymmetrically and retain their template DNA strands. Development 2005;132:681–687.
  27. Potten CS, Owen G, Booth D: Intestinal stem cells protect their genome by selective segregation of template DNA strands. J Cell Sci 2002;115:2381–2388.
  28. Karpowicz P, et al: Support for the immortal strand hypothesis: neural stem cells partition DNA asymmetrically in vitro. J Cell Biol 2005;170:721–732.
  29. Conboy MJ, Karasov AO, Rando TA: High incidence of non-random template strand segregation and asymmetric fate determination in dividing stem cells and their progeny. PLoS Biol 2007;5:e102.
  30. Reyes M, Verfaillie CM: Characterization of multipotent adult progenitor cells, a subpopulation of mesenchymal stem cells. Ann NY Acad Sci 2001;938:231–235.
  31. McLaren A: Mammalian germ cells: birth, sex, and immortality. Cell Struct Funct 2001;26:119–122.

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Regenerative and Technological Section

Received: September 25, 2008
Accepted: October 07, 2008
Published online: November 13, 2008
Issue release date: January 2009

Number of Print Pages: 4
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 0

ISSN: 0304-324X (Print)
eISSN: 1423-0003 (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/GER


Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
TOP