Login to MyKarger

New to MyKarger? Click here to sign up.



Login with Facebook

Forgot your password?

Authors, Editors, Reviewers

For Manuscript Submission, Check or Review Login please go to Submission Websites List.

Submission Websites List

Institutional Login
(Shibboleth or Open Athens)

For the academic login, please select your country in the dropdown list. You will be redirected to verify your credentials.

Clinical Investigations

Lung Sound Analysis in the Diagnosis of Obstructive Airway Disease

Wang Z.a, c · Jean S.a · Bartter T.b

Author affiliations

Divisions of aCritical Care Medicine and bPulmonary and Critical Care, Robert Wood Johnson School of Medicine, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Cooper University Hospital, Camden, N.J., USA; cDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China

Related Articles for ""

Respiration 2009;77:134–138

Do you have an account?

Login Information





Contact Information










I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.



Login Information





Contact Information










I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.



To view the fulltext, please log in

To view the pdf, please log in

Buy

  • FullText & PDF
  • Unlimited re-access via MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

CHF 38.00 *
EUR 35.00 *
USD 39.00 *

Select

KAB

Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!

If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.


Save over 20% compared to the individual article price.
Learn more

Rent/Cloud

  • Rent for 48h to view
  • Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
  • Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
  • Printing and saving restrictions apply

Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00


Select

Subscribe

  • Access to all articles of the subscribed year(s) guaranteed for 5 years
  • Unlimited re-access via Subscriber Login or MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

Subcription rates


Select

* The final prices may differ from the prices shown due to specifics of VAT rules.

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Clinical Investigations

Received: April 09, 2008
Accepted: August 15, 2008
Published online: November 25, 2008
Issue release date: February 2009

Number of Print Pages: 5
Number of Figures: 3
Number of Tables: 1

ISSN: 0025-7931 (Print)
eISSN: 1423-0356 (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/RES

Abstract

Background: Dyspnea is prevalent and has a broad differential diagnosis. Difficulty in determining the correct etiology can delay proper treatment. Non-invasively obtained acoustic signals may offer benefit in identifying patients with dyspnea due to obstructive airway disease (OAD). Objectives: The aim of this pilot study was to determine whether patients with acute dyspnea due to OAD had distinguishing features when studied with a computerized acoustic-based imaging technique. Methods: Respiratory sounds from patients with dyspnea due to OAD (n = 32) and those with dyspnea not due to OAD (n = 39) were studied and compared with normal controls (n = 16). Results: In patients without OAD and in controls, the ratios of peak inspiratory to peak expiratory vibration energy values (peak I/E vibration ratio) were remarkably similar, 6.3 ± 5.1 and 5.6 ± 4, respectively. For the OAD patients, the peak I/E vibration ratio was significantly lower at 1.3 ± 0.04 (p < 0.01). In the patients without OAD and the controls, the ratios of inspiratory time to expiratory time (I/E time ratio) were again similar, 1.0 ± 0.1 and 0.99 ± 0.11, respectively. For the OAD patients, the I/E time ratio was significantly lower at 0.72 ± 0.19 (p < 0.01). Conclusions: This modality was useful in identifying patients whose dyspnea was due to OAD. The ability to objectively and non-invasively measure these differences may prove clinically useful in distinguishing the operant physiology in patients presenting with acute dyspnea.

© 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel


References

  1. McCaig LF, Nawar EW: Division of Health Care Statistics National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2004 emergency department summary. Adv Data 2006; 372:1–29.
    External Resources
  2. McCord J, Nowak RM, McCullough PA, Foreback C, Borzak S, Tokarski G, Tomlanovich MC, Jacobsen G, Douglas W: Ninety-minute exclusion of acute myocardial infarction by use of quantitative point-of-care testing of myoglobin and troponin I. Circulation 2001;104:1483–1488.
  3. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, National Asthma Education and Prevention Program. Expert panel report 3: guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma. Full report 2007. http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/asthma/asthgdln.htm.
  4. Mannino DM: COPD: epidemiology, prevalence, morbidity and mortality, and disease heterogeneity. Chest 2002;121:121S–126S.
  5. Hoffman JR, Reynolds S: Comparison of nitroglycerin, morphine and furosemide in the treatment of presumed pre-hospital pulmonary edema. Chest 1987;92:586–593.
  6. Wuerz RC, Meador SA: Effects of prehospital medications on mortality and length of stay in congestive heart failure. Ann Emerg Med 1992;21:669–674.
  7. Trzeciak S, Rivers EP: Emergency department overcrowding in the United States: an emerging threat to patient safety and public health. Emerg Med J 2003;20:402–405.
  8. Chalfin DB, Trzeciak S, Likourezos A, Baumann BM, Dellinger RP, for the DELAY-ED study group: Impact of delayed transfer of critically ill patients from the emergency department to the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 2007;35:1477–1483.
  9. Congestive heart failure and pulmonary edema. www.emedicine.com/EMERG/topic108.
  10. Braunwald E, Zipes DP, Libby P: Heart Disease: A Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine, ed 6. Philadelphia, Saunders, 2000.
  11. Loudon HG, Murphy RLH: Lung sounds; in Crystal RG, West JB, Barnes PJ, Cherniack NS, Weibel ER (eds): The Lung. New York, Raven Press, 1991, pp 1011–1019.
  12. Schreur HJ, Vanderschoot J, Zwinderman AH, Dijkman JH, Sterk PJ: Abnormal lung sounds in patients with asthma during episodes with normal lung function. Chest 1994;106:91–99.
  13. Loudon RG: The lung exam. Clin Chest Med 1987;8:265–272.
  14. Ertel PY, Lawrence M, Brown RK, Stern AM: Stethoscope acoustics. 1. The doctor and his stethoscope. Circulation 1966;34:889–898.
  15. Pasterkamp H, Kraman S, Wodicka GR: Respiratory sounds. Advances beyond the stethoscope. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997;156:974–987.
  16. Dellinger RP, Jean S, Cinel I, Tay C, Rajanala S, Glickman YA, Parrillo JE: Regional distribution of acoustic-based lung vibration as a function of mechanical ventilation mode. Crit Care 2007;11:R26.
  17. Dellinger RP, Parrillo JE, Kushnir A, Rossi M, Kushnir I: Dynamic visualization of lung sounds with a vibration response device: a case series. Respiration 2008;75:60–72.
  18. Sharma V, Shaaban AM, Berges G, Gosselin M: The radiological spectrum of small-airway diseases. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2002;23:339–351.
  19. Sung A, Naidich D, Belinskaya I, Raoof S: The role of chest radiography and computed tomography in the diagnosis and management of asthma. Curr Opin Pulm Med 2007;13:31–36.
  20. Tgavalekos NT, Tawhai M, Harris RS, Musch G, Vidal-Melo M, Venegas JG, Lutchen KR: Identifying airways responsible for heterogeneous ventilation and mechanical dysfunction in asthma: an image functional modeling approach. J Appl Physiol 2005;99:2388–2397.
  21. Tanaka R, Sanada S, Okazaki N, Kobayashi T, Fujimura M, Yasui M, Matsui T, Nakayama K, Nanbu Y, Matsui O: Evaluation of pulmonary function using breathing chest radiography with a dynamic flat panel detector: primary results in pulmonary diseases. Invest Radiol 2006;41:735–745.
  22. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in adults in primary and secondary care. 2004. www.nice.org.uk/ CG012NICEguideline.

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Clinical Investigations

Received: April 09, 2008
Accepted: August 15, 2008
Published online: November 25, 2008
Issue release date: February 2009

Number of Print Pages: 5
Number of Figures: 3
Number of Tables: 1

ISSN: 0025-7931 (Print)
eISSN: 1423-0356 (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/RES


Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.