Digestive Surgery

Original Paper

A Comparison of Stapled and Hand-Sewn Anastomoses in Crohn’s Disease

Kusunoki M. · Ikeuchi H. · Yanagi H. · Shoji Y. · Yamamura T.

Author affiliations

Second Department of Surgery, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan

Related Articles for ""

Dig Surg 1998;15:679–682

Log in to MyKarger to check if you already have access to this content.


Buy

  • FullText & PDF
  • Unlimited re-access via MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

CHF 38.00 *
EUR 35.00 *
USD 39.00 *

Select

KAB

Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!


If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.


Save over 20% compared to the individual article price.

Learn more

Rent/Cloud

  • Rent for 48h to view
  • Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
  • Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
  • Printing and saving restrictions apply

Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00

Select

Subscribe

  • Access to all articles of the subscribed year(s) guaranteed for 5 years
  • Unlimited re-access via Subscriber Login or MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

Subcription rates


Select
* The final prices may differ from the prices shown due to specifics of VAT rules.

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Original Paper

Published online: November 16, 1998
Issue release date: 1998

Number of Print Pages: 4
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 2

ISSN: 0253-4886 (Print)
eISSN: 1421-9883 (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/DSU

Abstract

Sixty-eight patients with Crohn’s disease who underwent intestinal resection were randomly divided into 2 groups: the stapled group (32 patients, 40 anastomoses) with functional end-to-end anastomoses made with linear staplers and with circular stapling anastomoses, and the hand-sewn group (36 patients, 48 anastomoses), with anastomoses achieved by layer-to-layer suturing. There were no significant differences in operative indications, age, sex, blood loss, or length of hospital stay between the groups. The operation times for right hemicolectomy and total colectomy in the stapled group were significantly shorter than those in the hand-sewn group. There were no significant differences in anastomotic dehiscence or recurrence between the stapling and hand-sewn procedures. These results indicate that these stapling techniques, even though producing an everted anastomosis, are not an adverse procedure for Crohn’s disease.




Related Articles:


References

  1. Ravitch MM, Steichen FM: Technics of staple suturing in the gastrointestinal tract. Ann Surg 1972;175:815–837.
    External Resources
  2. Scher KS, Scott-Conner C, Jones CW, Leach M: A comparison of stapled and sutured anastomoses in colonic operations. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1987;155:489–493.
  3. Kusunoki M, Yanagi H, Sakanoue Y, Shoji Y, Nakagawa K, Yamamura T, Utsunomiya J: Review of 200 stapled functional end-to-end anastomoses. Dig Surg 1993;10:245–248.
  4. Dunn DH, Robbins P, Decannivi C, Goldberg S, Delaney JP: A comparison of stapled and hand-sewn colonic anastomoses. Dis Colon Rectum 1978;21:636–639.
    External Resources
  5. Chassin JL, Rifkind KM, Sussman B, Kassel B, Fingaret A, Drager S, Chassin PS: The stapled gastrointestinal tract anastomosis: Incidence of postoperative complications compared with the suture anastomosis. Ann Surg 1978;188:689–696.
    External Resources
  6. Steichen FM: The use of staplers in anatomical side-to-side and functional end-to-end enteroanastomoses. Surgery 1968;64:948–953.
    External Resources
  7. Friend PJ, Scott R, Everett WG, Scott IHK: Stapling or suturing for anastomoses of the left side of the large intestine. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1990;171:373–376.
  8. Pennington L, Hamilton SR, Bayless TM, Cameron JL: Surgical management of Crohn’s disease. Influence of disease at margin of resection. Ann Surg 1980;192:311–318.
    External Resources

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Original Paper

Published online: November 16, 1998
Issue release date: 1998

Number of Print Pages: 4
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 2

ISSN: 0253-4886 (Print)
eISSN: 1421-9883 (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/DSU


Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
TOP