Digestive Surgery

Original Paper

Increased Risk of Wound Complications and Poor Healing following Laparotomy in HIV-Seropositive and AIDS Patients

Davis P.A.a · Corless D.J.a · Gazzard B.G.b · Wastell C.a

Author affiliations

Departments of aAcademic Surgery and bHIV/GU Medicine, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK

Related Articles for ""

Dig Surg 1999;16:60–67

Log in to MyKarger to check if you already have access to this content.


Buy

  • FullText & PDF
  • Unlimited re-access via MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

CHF 38.00 *
EUR 35.00 *
USD 39.00 *

Select

KAB

Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!


If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.


Save over 20% compared to the individual article price.

Learn more

Rent/Cloud

  • Rent for 48h to view
  • Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
  • Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
  • Printing and saving restrictions apply

Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00

Select

Subscribe

  • Access to all articles of the subscribed year(s) guaranteed for 5 years
  • Unlimited re-access via Subscriber Login or MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

Subcription rates


Select
* The final prices may differ from the prices shown due to specifics of VAT rules.

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Original Paper

Published online: February 12, 1999
Issue release date: 1999

Number of Print Pages: 8
Number of Figures: 2
Number of Tables: 5

ISSN: 0253-4886 (Print)
eISSN: 1421-9883 (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/DSU

Abstract

The number of individuals in the UK who are HIV seropositive is increasing as is their presentation with abdominal complications. Poor wound healing following anorectal surgery in HIV-positive patients has been well reported. This study reviews the incidence of wound complications following laparotomy. The hospital records of all HIV-positive patients who underwent laparotomy at a London teaching hospital over a 10-year period were reviewed and compared to an equal number of matched non-HIV patients. Between April 1986 and April 1996, 64 laparotomies were carried out on 53 patients. There was a significantly greater incidence of wound complications (χ2 = 12.75, 1 d.f., p = 0.0003) and wound breakdown (χ2 = 10.45, 1 d.f., p = 0.012) in the HIV group following laparotomy than in the non-HIV control group.




Related Articles:


References

  1. Anonymous: World Health Organisation global AIDS statistics. AIDS Care 1995;7:543–547.
  2. Ramsay S: English HIV and AIDS projections made. Lancet 1996;347:109.
  3. Diettrich NA, Cacioppo JC, Kaplan G, Cohen SM: A growing spectrum of surgical disease in patients with acquired immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Arch Surg 1991;126:860–866.
  4. Wexner SD, Smithy WB, Milsom JW, Dailey TH: The surgical management of anorectal diseases in AIDS and pre-AIDS patients. Dis Colon Rectum 1986;29:719–723.
  5. Carr ND, Mercey D, Slack WW: Non-condylomatous perianal disease in homosexual men. Br J Surg 1989;76:1064–1066.
  6. Wakeman R, Johnson CD, Wastell C: Surgical procedures in patients at risk of human immunodeficiency virus infection. J R Soc Med 1990;83:315–318.
  7. Wolkomir AF, Barone JE, Hardy HW, Cottone FJ: Abdominal and anorectal surgery and the acquired immune deficiency syndrome in heterosexual intravenous drug users. Dis Colon Rectum 1990;33:267–270.
  8. Burke EC, Orloff SL, Freise CE, Macho JR, Schecter WP: Wound healing after anorectal surgery in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients. Arch Surg 1991;126:1267–1270.
  9. Safavi A, Gottesman L, Dailey TH: Anorectal surgery in the HIV+ patient: Update. Dis Colon Rectum 1991;34:299–304.
  10. Puy-Montbrun T, Denis J, Ganansia R, Mathoniere F, Lemarchand N, Arnous-Dubois N: Anorectal lesions in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients. Int J Colorectal Dis 1992;7:26–30.
  11. Consten ECJ, Slors FJM, Noten HJ, Oosting H, Danner SA, Van Lanschot JJB: Anorectal surgery in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients. Clinical outcome in relation to immune status. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:1169–1175.
  12. Lord RVN: Anorectal surgery in patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus. Factors associated with delayed wound healing. Ann Surg 1997;226:92–99.
  13. Barone JE, Gingold BS, Nealon TF, Arvantis ML: Abdominal pain in patients with acquired immune deficiency syndrome. Ann Surg 1986;204:619–623.
    External Resources
  14. Nugent P, O’Connell TX: The surgeon’s role in treating acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Arch Surg 1986;121:1117–1120.
    External Resources
  15. LaRaja RD, Rothenberg RE, Odom JW, Mueller SC: The incidence of intra-abdominal surgery in acquired immunodeficiency syndrome: A statistical review of 904 patients. Surgery 1989;105:175–179.
    External Resources
  16. Robinson G, Wilson SE, Williams RA: Surgery in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Arch Surg 1987;122:170–175.
    External Resources
  17. Wexner SD, Smithy WB, Trillo C, Hopkins BS, Dailey TH: Emergency colectomy for cytomegalovirus ileocolitis in patients with the acquired immune deficiency syndrome. Dis Colon Rectum 1988;31:755–761.
    External Resources
  18. Burack JH, Mandel MS, Bizer LS: Emergency abdominal operations in the patient with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Arch Surg 1989;124:285–286.
    External Resources
  19. Wilson SE, Robinson G, Williams RA, Stabile BE, Cone L, Saefeh IJ, Miller DR, Passaro E: Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS): Indications for abdominal surgery, pathology and outcome. Ann Surg 1989;210:428–434.
    External Resources
  20. Wolkomir AF, Barone JE, Hardy HW, Cottone FJ: Abdominal and anorectal surgery and the acquired immune deficiency syndrome in heterosexual intravenous drug users. Dis Colon Rectum 1990;33:267–270.
  21. Centers for Disease Control: 1993 revised classification system for HIV infection and expanded surveillance case definition for AIDS among adolescents and adults. MMWR 1992;41:1–19.
  22. Bains JW, Crawford DT, Ketcham AS: Effect of chronic anaemia on wound tensile strength. Ann Surg 1966;164:243–246.
  23. Hugo NE, Thompson LW, Zook EG, Bennett JE: Effect of chronic anaemia on the tensile strength of healing wounds. Surgery 1969;66:741–745.
    External Resources
  24. Ruberg RL: Role of Nutrition in Wound Healing. Surg Clin North Am 1984;64:705–714.
  25. Buehler JL, Weber DJ, Meyer AA, Becherer PR, Rutala WA, Wilson B, Smiley ML, White GC: Wound infection rates after invasive procedures in HIV-1 seropositive versus HIV-1 seronegative haemophiliacs. Ann Surg 1989;211:492–498.
  26. Guiney EJ, Morris PJ, Donaldson GA: Wound dehiscence. A continuing problem in abdominal surgery. Arch Surg 1966;92:47–51.
    External Resources
  27. Reitamo J, Moller C: Abdominal wound dehiscence. Acta Chir Scand 1972;138:170–175.
    External Resources

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Original Paper

Published online: February 12, 1999
Issue release date: 1999

Number of Print Pages: 8
Number of Figures: 2
Number of Tables: 5

ISSN: 0253-4886 (Print)
eISSN: 1421-9883 (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/DSU


Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
TOP