Nephron
Original Paper
Theophylline Modulates Erythrocytosis after Renal TransplantationGrekas D. · Dioudis C. · Valkouma D. · Papoulidou F. · Tourkantonis A.First Medical Department, Renal Unit, University Hospital AHEPA, Thessaloniki, Greece
|
|
Log in to MyKarger to check if you already have access to this content.
KAB
Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!
If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.
Save over 20% compared to the individual article price.
Article / Publication Details
Accepted: March 31, 1994
Published online: December 18, 2008
Issue release date: 1995
Number of Print Pages: 3
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 0
ISSN: 1660-8151 (Print)
eISSN: 2235-3186 (Online)
For additional information: https://www.karger.com/NEF
Abstract
Erythrocytosis occurs in 10-15% of renal transplant recipients and there is evidence that the production of erythropoietin is modulated by adenosine. We prospectively evaluated the effects of theophylline, a nonselective adenosine antagonist, in 8 patients with erythrocytosis after renal transplantation. All patients were given triple-drug immunosuppressive therapy with methylprednisolone (8 mg/daily), azathioprine (2 mg/kg b.w. daily) and cyclosporin A (4 mg/kg b.w. daily). After an 8-week course of theophylline treatment (Theodur 300 mg × 2 daily), the mean serum erythropoietin levels were significantly reduced (from 61 mlU/ml before to 16.5 mlU/ml after treatment, p < 0.05). Also the hematocrit was reduced from 0.58 before to 0.50 after treatment (p < 0.05). The previous requirement of monthly phlebotomy was eliminated in all transplant recipients. The above effects were reproducible when the patients were rechallenged with theophylline after a recovery period. It is suggested that theophylline modulates the production of erythropoietin as well as the hematocrit levels in patients with erythrocytosis after renal transplantation and may be useful in the treatment of this condition.
© 1995 S. Karger AG, Basel
Related Articles:
Article / Publication Details
Accepted: March 31, 1994
Published online: December 18, 2008
Issue release date: 1995
Number of Print Pages: 3
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 0
ISSN: 1660-8151 (Print)
eISSN: 2235-3186 (Online)
For additional information: https://www.karger.com/NEF
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

Get Permission