Login to MyKarger

New to MyKarger? Click here to sign up.



Login with Facebook

Forgot your password?

Authors, Editors, Reviewers

For Manuscript Submission, Check or Review Login please go to Submission Websites List.

Submission Websites List

Institutional Login
(Shibboleth or Open Athens)

For the academic login, please select your country in the dropdown list. You will be redirected to verify your credentials.

Technical Note

Flexible Bronchoscope Damage and Repair Costs in a Bronchoscopy Teaching Unit

Rozman A. · Duh S. · Petrinec-Primozic M. · Triller N.

Author affiliations

University Clinic for Pulmonary and Allergic Diseases Golnik, Golnik, Slovenia

Related Articles for ""

Respiration 2009;77:325–330

Do you have an account?

Login Information





Contact Information











I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.



Login Information





Contact Information











I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.



To view the fulltext, please log in

To view the pdf, please log in

Buy

  • FullText & PDF
  • Unlimited re-access via MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

CHF 38.00 *
EUR 35.00 *
USD 39.00 *

Select

KAB

Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!

If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.


Save over 20% compared to the individual article price.
Learn more

Rent/Cloud

  • Rent for 48h to view
  • Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
  • Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
  • Printing and saving restrictions apply

Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00


Select

Subscribe

  • Access to all articles of the subscribed year(s) guaranteed for 5 years
  • Unlimited re-access via Subscriber Login or MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

Subcription rates


Select

* The final prices may differ from the prices shown due to specifics of VAT rules.

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Technical Note

Received: March 25, 2008
Accepted: August 28, 2008
Published online: December 20, 2008
Issue release date: April 2009

Number of Print Pages: 6
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 2

ISSN: 0025-7931 (Print)
eISSN: 1423-0356 (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/RES

Abstract

Background: A significant part of the budget of our bronchoscopy unit represents repair costs for damaged bronchoscopes. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency, type and cause of damage to the bronchoscope as well as the repair costs. Methods: Frequency, type and cause of bronchoscope damage and repair costs of 13 new bronchoscopes that were used between August 1, 2001, and December 31, 2006, were retrospectively studied. Results: We recorded 47 instances of bronchoscope damage during the study, which is 1 instance of damage/141.6 procedures. Six instances of damage (12.7%) were potentially preventable. The most frequent wear and tear damage was to the rubber sheath on the distal bending portion of flexible bronchoscopes, and the most frequently preventable damage was that of the suction channel of the bronchoscope. The repair costs totaled 34,950.00 EUR or 5.25 EUR/procedure. 17,781.00 EUR (50.9%) can be attributed to preventable damage. The use of bronchoscopes for educational purposes was not associated with a higher rate of bronchoscope damage at our institution. Conclusions: Only a small number of occurrences of bronchoscope damage in our unit are potentially preventable, but they still represent an important expense. The relatively low occurrence of preventable damage is a result of the successful bronchoscopy training program.

© 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel


References

  1. Mehta AC, Curtis PS, Scalzitti ML: The high price of bronchoscopy: maintenance and repair of the flexible fiberoptic bronchoscope. Chest 1990;98:448–454.
  2. Kirkpatrick MB, Smith JR, Hoffman PJ: Bronchoscope damage and repair costs: results of a regional postal survey. Respir Care 1992;37:1256–1259.
  3. Lunn W, Garland R, Gryniuk L, Smith L, Feller-Kopman D, Ernst A: Reducing maintenance and repair costs in an interventional pulmonology program. Chest 2005;127:1382–1387.
  4. Triller N: Smernice za bronhoskopijo z upogljivim bronhoskopom. Endosk Rev 2002;7:3–21.
  5. Mešič J, Zupanič S, Triller N: 50-letnica bronhoskopije na Golniku. ISIS – Glasilo Zdravniške Zbornice Slovenije 2002;11:64–65.
  6. Blum MG, Powers TW, Sundaresan S: Bronchoscopy simulator effectively prepares junior residents to competently perform basic clinical bronchoscopy. Ann Thorac Surg 2004;78:287–291.
  7. Ost D, DeRosiers A, Britt EJ, Fein AM, Lesser ML, Mehta AC: Assessment of a bronchoscopy simulator. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001;164:2248–2255.
  8. Davoudi M, Osann K, Colt HG: Validation of two instruments to assess technical bronchoscopic skill using virtual reality simulation. Respiration 2008;76:92–101.

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Technical Note

Received: March 25, 2008
Accepted: August 28, 2008
Published online: December 20, 2008
Issue release date: April 2009

Number of Print Pages: 6
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 2

ISSN: 0025-7931 (Print)
eISSN: 1423-0356 (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/RES


Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.