Respiration
Original Paper
Role of Na+ and Ca++ in Guinea Pig Trachealis Contraction Induced by CoolingSantacana G. · Chen W.Y.Department of Physiology, Universidad Central del Caribe School of Medicine, Cayey, P.R., USA
|
|
Log in to MyKarger to check if you already have access to this content.
KAB
Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!
If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.
Save over 20% compared to the individual article price.
Article / Publication Details
Received: May 20, 1987
Accepted: October 15, 1987
Published online: January 16, 2009
Issue release date: 1988
Number of Print Pages: 7
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 0
ISSN: 0025-7931 (Print)
eISSN: 1423-0356 (Online)
For additional information: https://www.karger.com/RES
Abstract
The role of extracellular Na+ and Ca++ in cooling-induced contraction (CIC) was studied in guinea pig trachealis muscle. Tracheal preparations were tested in Krebs-Ringer bicarbonate (KRB) solution and then in either: (1) a low Na+ sucrose KRB, (2) KRB plus amiloride, a sodium channel blocker, or (3) KRB plus nifedipine, a calcium channel blocker. When the trachealis muscle was cooled from 37 to 20 °C in KRB, the value of the isometric tension increased on average by 25% of the maximal tension induced by acetylcholine; however, when the tissue was tested in the low Na+ sucrose KRB or the KRB containing amiloride, CIC was totally prevented. In the presence of nifedipine the mean value of CIC was only 10% of the acetylcholine-induced contraction, which was also observed not to be affected by extracellular Na+ or Ca++; whereas the KCl-induced contraction was affected by Ca++ but not by Na+. The results suggest that rapid cooling of the smooth muscle cells causes an increase in sodium conductance and a decrease in the activity of the Na+-K+ pump, resulting in membrane depolarization. During depolarization a significant quantity of Ca++ enters the cell, contributing to the magnitude of CIC.
© 1988 S. Karger AG, Basel
Related Articles:
Article / Publication Details
Received: May 20, 1987
Accepted: October 15, 1987
Published online: January 16, 2009
Issue release date: 1988
Number of Print Pages: 7
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 0
ISSN: 0025-7931 (Print)
eISSN: 1423-0356 (Online)
For additional information: https://www.karger.com/RES
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

Get Permission