Respiration

Original Paper

Intrapleural Corynebacterium parvum for Recurrent Malignant Pleural Effusions

Foresti V.

Author affiliations

Third Medical Department, Fatebenefratelli Hospital, Milan, Italy

Related Articles for ""

Respiration 1995;62:21–26

Log in to MyKarger to check if you already have access to this content.


Buy

  • FullText & PDF
  • Unlimited re-access via MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

CHF 38.00 *
EUR 35.00 *
USD 39.00 *

Select

KAB

Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!


If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.


Save over 20% compared to the individual article price.

Learn more

Rent/Cloud

  • Rent for 48h to view
  • Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
  • Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
  • Printing and saving restrictions apply

Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00

Select

Subscribe

  • Access to all articles of the subscribed year(s) guaranteed for 5 years
  • Unlimited re-access via Subscriber Login or MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

Subcription rates


Select
* The final prices may differ from the prices shown due to specifics of VAT rules.

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Original Paper

Received: August 02, 1993
Accepted: August 29, 1994
Published online: January 21, 2009
Issue release date: 1995

Number of Print Pages: 6
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 0

ISSN: 0025-7931 (Print)
eISSN: 1423-0356 (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/RES

Abstract

Twenty-two consecutive patients with malignant pleural effusions (MPE) were treated with intrapleural Corynebacterium parvum (CBP) associated with parenteral methylprednisolone (MP) to determine its effectiveness and the frequency and nature of adverse reactions. After thoracentesis, 7 mg of CBP (Coparvax Wellcome) in 20 ml of saline were injected into the pleural cavity. On the day of treatment, the patients were given 1 mg/kg i.m. of MP 30 min before thoracentesis. The effectiveness of pleurodesis was assessed as follows: (1) complete response (CR; total resolution of pleural effusion after 3 injections of CBP at the most); (2) partial response (PR; formation of asymptomatic loculated effusion). In 5 patients leukocytes, lymphocytes and monocytes were determined in pleural fluid (PF) and in blood (B) collected before and 7 days after CBP treatment. Two patients were unevaluable. Of 20 evaluable patients, 18 (90%) had a CR and 2 patients (10%) had a PR. Eleven of 22 patients (50%) had a fever. Three patients had prolonged and/or high fever. Seven of 22 patients (32%) had mild chest pain. None of the patients presented other side effects. Twelve of 21 patients (57.1%) had a PF pH > 7.30; 2 of these died a few days after the treatment, and 10 had favorable responses. The other 9 patients had a PF pH < 7.30: all had favorable responses. The leukocytes, the lymphocyte subsets, the monocytes, the NK lymphocytes, and their PF/B ratios did not differ significantly before and after CBP treatment. Our study confirms that intrapleural CBP is an effective and simple method to control MPE. The combination of MP with CBP did not prevent effective pleurodesis and seems to reduce the frequency of adverse reactions, except fever.

© 1995 S. Karger AG, Basel




Related Articles:


Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Original Paper

Received: August 02, 1993
Accepted: August 29, 1994
Published online: January 21, 2009
Issue release date: 1995

Number of Print Pages: 6
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 0

ISSN: 0025-7931 (Print)
eISSN: 1423-0356 (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/RES


Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
TOP