Cerebrovascular Diseases
Etiology and Risk Factors for Ischemic Stroke
Cardioembolic Stroke: Call for a Multidisciplinary ApproachGonzález Babarro E. · Román Rego A. · González-Juanatey J.R.Department of Cardiology, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
|
|
Log in to MyKarger to check if you already have access to this content.
KAB
Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!
If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.
Save over 20% compared to the individual article price.
Article / Publication Details
Published online: April 03, 2009
Issue release date: April 2009
Number of Print Pages: 6
Number of Figures: 2
Number of Tables: 2
ISSN: 1015-9770 (Print)
eISSN: 1421-9786 (Online)
For additional information: https://www.karger.com/CED
Abstract
Cardioembolic stroke accounts for one third of all ischemic strokes, and atrial fibrillation (AF) is the cardiac source of emboli in 50% of them. However, the absolute risk of stroke associated with AF has enormous variability, and several clinical risk stratification schemes have been proposed. One of the most validated and used in clinical practice is the CHADS2 index, characterized by its simplicity and rapid application. Current recommendations about antithrombotic therapy in AF patients are based on assessment of annual risk of stroke; thus, antiaggregation is indicated in patients with a low risk, and anticoagulation is prescribed when annual risk is greater than 2.5%. Relevant studies comparing rate and rhythm control do not defend achievement and maintenance of sinus rhythm as a routine management of AF patients and demonstrate that rate control is comparable or even better than rhythm control in terms of survival and quality of life. Optimal control of blood pressure is a relevant factor in preventing cardioembolic stroke in AF patients, because hypertension multiplies the risk of stroke by 12. Antihypertensive drugs such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers proved to reduce AF recurrences, especially in the context of left ventricular dysfunction and ventricular hypertrophy.
© 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel
Related Articles:
References
- Bougousslavsky J, Cachin C, Regli F, Despland PA, Van Melle G, Kappenberger L: Cardiac sources of embolism and cerebral infarction. Clinical consequences and vascular concomitants: The Lausanne Stroke Registry. Neurology 1991;41:855–959.
- Cerebral Embolism Task Force: Cardiogenic brain embolism. Arch Neurol 1989;46:727–743.
- Timsit SG, Sacco RL, Mohr JP, Foulkes MA, Tatemichi TK, Wolf PA, et al: Brain infarction severity according to cardiac or arterial embolic source. Neurology 1993;43:728–733.
- Ramirez-Lassepas M, Cipolle RJ, Bjork RJ: Can embolic stroke be diagnosed on the basis of neurologic clinical criteria? Arch Neurol 1987;44:87–89.
- Chugh SS, Blackshear JL, Win-Kuang S, Hemmill SC, Gersh BJ: Epidemiology and natural history of atrial fibrillation: clinical implication. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;37:371–378.
-
Rodriguez Padial L: Cavidades izquierdas; in Rodriguez Padial L (ed): Ecocardiografía. Madrid, Edicomplet, 2006, pp 121–144.
- Fuster V, Ryden LE, Cannom DS, Crijns HJ, Curtis AB, Ellenbogen KA, et al: ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Atrial Fibrillation – Executive Summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:854–906.
- Ruiz M, Romo E, Mesa D, Delgado M, Anguita M, López A, et al: Predicción de eventos embólicos en pacientes con fibrilación auricular no valvular: evaluación del score CHADS2 en una población mediterránea. Rev Esp Cardiol 2008;61:29–35.
- Fang MC, Go AS, Chang Y, Borowsky L, Pomernacki NK, Singer DE; ATRIA Study Group: Comparison of risk stratification schemes to predict thromboembolism in people with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51:810–815.
- Lip GY, Frison L, Grind M; SPORTIF Investigators: Effect of hypertension on anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J 2007;28:752–759.
- Wachtell K, Letho M, Gerdts E, Olsen MH, Hornestam B, Dahlof B, et al: Angiotensin II receptor blockade reduces new-onset atrial fibrillation and subsequent stroke compared to atenolol: the Losartan Intervention For End point in hypertension (LIFE) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45:712–719.
- Olshansky B, Heller EN, Mitchell LB, Chandler M, Slater W, Green M, et al; AFFIRM Investigators: Are transthoracic echocardiographic parameters associated with atrial fibrillation recurrence or stroke? Results from the Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management (AFFIRM) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45:2026–2033.
- Wyse DG, Gersh BJ: Atrial fibrillation: a perspective: thinking inside and outside the box. Circulation 2004;109:3089–3095.
- Dernellis J, Panaretou M: Relationship between C-reactive protein concentrations during glucocorticoid therapy and recurrent atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J 2004;25:1100–1107.
- Go AS, Hylek EM, Chang Y, Phillips KA, Henault LE, Capra AM, et al: Anticoagulation therapy for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: how well randomized trials translate into clinical practice? JAMA 2003;290:2685–2692.
- The AFFIRM Investigators: A comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2002;347:1825–1833.
- The AFFIRM Investigators: Relationships between sinus rhythm, treatment, and survival in the Atrial Fibrillation Follow-Up Investigation of Rhythm Management (AFFIRM) Study. Circulation 2004;109:1509–1513.
- Rienstra M, Van Veldhuisen DJ, Crijns HJG, Van Gelder IC; RACE Investigators: Enhanced cardiovascular morbidity and mortality during rhythm control treatment in persistent atrial fibrillation in hypertensives: data of the RACE study. Eur Heart J 2007;28:741–751.
-
Falk RH: Is rate control or rhythm control preferable in patients with atrial fibrillation? Rate control is preferable to rhythm control in the majority of patients with atrial fibrillation. Circulation 2005;11:3141–3157.
External Resources
- Yin Y, Dalal D, Liu Z, Wu J, Liu D, Lan X, et al: Prospective randomized study comparing amiodarone vs. amiodarone plus losartan vs. amiodarone plus perindopril for the prevention of atrial fibrillation recurrence in patients with lone paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J 2006;27:1841–1846.
- Healy JS, Baranchuck A, Crystal E, Morillo CA, Garfinkle M, Yusuf S, et al: Prevention of atrial fibrillation with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45:1832–1839.
- Loh E, Sutton MS, Wun CC, Rouleau JL, Flaker GC, Gottlieb SS, et al: Ventricular dysfunction and the risk of stroke after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1997;336:251–257.
- Mahaffey KW, Harrington RA, Simoons ML, Granger CB, Graffagnino C, Alberts MJ, et al: Stroke in patients with acute coronary syndromes: incidence and outcomes in the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa in unstable angina. Receptor suppression using integrilin therapy (PURSUIT) trial. Circulation 1999;99:2371–2377.
Article / Publication Details
Published online: April 03, 2009
Issue release date: April 2009
Number of Print Pages: 6
Number of Figures: 2
Number of Tables: 2
ISSN: 1015-9770 (Print)
eISSN: 1421-9786 (Online)
For additional information: https://www.karger.com/CED
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
