Login to MyKarger

New to MyKarger? Click here to sign up.



Login with Facebook

Forgot your password?

Authors, Editors, Reviewers

For Manuscript Submission, Check or Review Login please go to Submission Websites List.

Submission Websites List

Institutional Login
(Shibboleth or Open Athens)

For the academic login, please select your country in the dropdown list. You will be redirected to verify your credentials.

Recovery after Stroke: Strategies to Improve

Quality of Life after Stroke: The Importance of a Good Recovery

Carod-Artal F.J.a · Egido J.A.b

Author affiliations

aDepartment of Neurology, Sarah Hospital, The Sarah Network of Rehabilitation Hospitals, Brasilia, Brazil; bStroke Unit, Department of Neurology, San Carlos Hospital, Madrid, Spain

Related Articles for ""

Cerebrovasc Dis 2009;27(suppl 1):204–214

Do you have an account?

Login Information





Contact Information











I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.



Login Information





Contact Information











I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.



To view the fulltext, please log in

To view the pdf, please log in

Buy

  • FullText & PDF
  • Unlimited re-access via MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

CHF 38.00 *
EUR 35.00 *
USD 39.00 *

Select

KAB

Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!

If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.


Save over 20% compared to the individual article price.
Learn more

Rent/Cloud

  • Rent for 48h to view
  • Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
  • Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
  • Printing and saving restrictions apply

Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00


Select

Subscribe

  • Access to all articles of the subscribed year(s) guaranteed for 5 years
  • Unlimited re-access via Subscriber Login or MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

Subcription rates


Select

* The final prices may differ from the prices shown due to specifics of VAT rules.

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Recovery after Stroke: Strategies to Improve

Published online: April 03, 2009
Issue release date: April 2009

Number of Print Pages: 11
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 8

ISSN: 1015-9770 (Print)
eISSN: 1421-9786 (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/CED

Abstract

Background: Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is a recognized and important outcome after stroke. An increased survival and the presence of moderate impairment in long-term stroke survivors impact their HRQoL. Methods: HRQoL measures and HRQoL determinants in stroke survivors are reviewed. Results: Stroke is the leading cause of long-term disability in western countries. Specific HRQoL scales have been developed in the last years, such as the Stroke Impact Scale, the Stroke Specific Quality of Life Scale, the Stroke and Aphasia HRQoL Scale, and the Burden of Stroke Scale. Disability and poststroke depression are consistent determinants of HRQoL. Other determinants include female sex, coping strategies, and social support. Poststroke depression affects HRQoL, functional recovery, cognitive function and healthcare use in stroke survivors. Stroke caregivers have lower HRQoL, greater prevalence of stress and depression, economical burden, and changes in social relationships. Advancing age and anxiety in patients and caregivers, high dependency and poor family support identify caregivers at risk of adverse outcomes. Conclusions: Physical and psychosocial well-being is greatly affected in stroke survivors and their caregivers.

© 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel


References

  1. Asplund K, Stegmayr B, Peltonen M: From the twentieth to the twenty-first century: a public health perspective on stroke; in Ginsberg MD, Bogousslavsky J (eds): Cerebrovascular Disease. Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Management. Malden, Blackwell Science, 1998, vol 2.
  2. Bonita R, Solomon N, Broad J: Prevalence of stroke and stroke-related disability. Estimates from the Auckland Stroke Studies. Stroke 1997;28:1898–1902.
  3. Rosamond W, Flegal K, Furie K, Go A, Greenlund K, Haase N, Hailpern SM, Ho M, Howard V, Kissela B, Kittner S, Lloyd-Jones D, McDermott M, Meigs J, Moy C, Nichol G, O’Donnell C, Roger V, Sorlie P, Steinberger J, Thom T, Wilson M, Hong Y, American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee: Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics – 2008 Update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation 2008;117:e25–e146.
  4. Thorngren M, Westling B: Rehabilitation and achieved health quality after stroke: a population-based study of 258 hospitalized cases followed for one year. Acta Neurol Scand 1990;82:274–380.
  5. Carod-Artal FJ, Medeiros MS, Horan TA, Braga LW: Predictive factors of functional gain in long-term stroke survivors admitted to a rehabilitation programme. Brain Inj 2005;19:667–673.
  6. Kelley-Hayes M, Beiser A, Kase CS, Scaramucci A, D’Agostino RB, Wolf PA: The influence of gender and age on disability following ischemic stroke: the Framingham study. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2003;12:119–126.
  7. The WHOQOL Group: Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. Psychol Med 1998;28:551–558.
  8. Schipper H, Clinch JJ, Olweny CLM: Quality of life studies: definitions and conceptual issues; in Spilker B (ed): Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials. New York, Lippincott-Raven, 1996, pp 11–23.
  9. Wilson I, Cleary P: Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life: a conceptual model of patient outcomes. JAMA 1995;273:59–65.
  10. Carod-Artal FJ, González Gutiérrez JL, Egido Herrero JA, Horan T, Varela de Seijas E: Functional recovery and instrumental activities of daily living in stroke patients discharged from a Stroke Unit. One year follow up. Brain Inj 2002;16:207–216.
  11. Carod-Artal J, Egido JA, Gonzalez JL, Varela de Seijas E: Quality of life among stroke survivors evaluated 1 year after stroke: experience of a stroke unit. Stroke 2000;31:2995–3000.
  12. Mahoney FI, Barthel DW: Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Md State Med J 1965;14:61–65.
  13. Rankin J: Cerebral vascular accidents in patients over the age of 60. II. prognosis. Scott Med J 1957;2:200–215.
  14. Ware JE, Snow KK, Kosinski M, Gandeck B: SF-36 Health Survey: manual and interpretation guide. Boston, New England Medical Center, Health Institute, 1993.
  15. Bergner M, Bobbitt RA, Pollard WE, Martin DP, Gilson BS: The Sickness Impact Profile: validation of a health status measure. Med Care 1976;14:57–67.
  16. The Euroquol Group: Euroquol: a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 1990;16:199–208.
  17. de Bruin AF, Diederiks JP, de Witte LP, Stevens FC, Philipsen H: The development of a short generic version of the sickness impact profile. J Clin Epidemiol 1994;47:407–408.
  18. de Bruin AF, Diederiks JPM, de Witte LP, Stevens FCJ, Philipsen H: SIP68. A Short Version of the Sickness Impact Profile. Maastricht, Institute for Rehabilitation and Research (iRv), Hoensbroek/University Maastricht, 1994.
  19. Buck D, Jacoby A, Massey A, Ford G: Evaluation of measures used to assess quality of life after stroke. Stroke 2000;31:2004–2010.
  20. Lai SM, Perera S, Duncan PW, Bode R: Physical and social functioning after stroke. Comparison of the Stroke Impact Scale and Short Form-36. Stroke 2003;34:488–493.
  21. Haacke C, Althaus A, Spottke A, Siebert U, Back T, Dodel R: Long-term outcome after stroke: evaluating health-related quality of life using utility measurements. Stroke 2006;37:193–198.
  22. Tengs TO, Yu M, Luistro E: Health-related quality of life after stroke. A comprehensive review. Stroke 2001;32:964–972.
  23. Post PN, Stiggelbout AM, Wakker PP: The Utility of health states after stroke. A systematic review of the literature. Stroke 2001;32:1425–1429.
  24. Carod-Artal FJ: Specific scales for rating quality of life after stroke (in Spanish). Rev Neurol 2004;39:1052–1062.
  25. Duncan PW, Wallace D, Lai SM, Johnson D, Embretson S, Laster LJ: The Stroke Impact Scale Version 2.0. Evaluation of reliability, validity and sensitivity to change. Stroke 1999;30:2131–2140.
  26. Williams LS, Weinberger M, Harris LE, Clark DO, Biller J: Development of a stroke-specific quality of life scale. Stroke 1999;30:1362–1369.
  27. Hilari K, Bying S, Lamping DL, Smith SC: Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale-39 (SAQOL-39). Evaluation of acceptability, reliability and validity. Stroke 2003;34:1944–1950.
  28. Doyle PJ, McNeil MR, Bost JE, Ross KB, Wambaugh JL, Hula WD, Mikolic JM: The Burden of Stroke Scale (BOSS) provided valid, reliable, and responsive score estimates of functioning and well-being during the first year of recovery from stroke. Qual Life Res 2007;16:1389–1398.
  29. van Straten A, de Haan RJ, Limburg M, Schuling J, Bossuyt PM, van den Bos GA: A stroke-adapted 30-item version of the Sickness Impact Profile to assess quality of life (SA-SIP30). Stroke 1997;28:2155–2161.
  30. Buck D, Jacoby A, Massey A, Steen N, Sharma A, Ford GA: Development and validation of NEWSQOL, the Newcastle stroke-specific quality of life measure. Cerebrovasc Dis 2004;17:143–152.
  31. Hamedani AG, Wells CK, Brass LM, Kernan WN, Viscoli CM, Maraire JN, Awad IA, Horwitz RI: A quality-of-life instrument for young hemorrhagic stroke patients. Stroke 2001;32:687–695.
  32. Carod-Artal FJ, Ferreira Coral L, Stieven Trizotto D, Menezes Moreira C: The Stroke Impact Scale 3.0: evaluation of acceptability, reliability and validity of the Brazilian version. Stroke 2008;39:2477–2484.
  33. Duncan PW, Bode RK, Min Lai S, Perera S; Glycine Antagonist in Neuroprotection Americans Investigators: Rasch analysis of a new stroke-specific outcome scale: the Stroke Impact Scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003;84:950–963.
  34. Kwon S, Duncan P, Studenski S, Perera S, Lai SM, Reker D: Measuring stroke impact with SIS: construct validity of SIS telephone administration. Qual Life Res 2006;15:367–376.
  35. Duncan PW, Reker DM, Horner RD, Samsa GP, Hoenig H, LaClair BJ, Dudley TK: Performance of a mail-administered version of a stroke-specific outcome measure, the Stroke Impact Scale. Clin Rehabil 2002;16:493–505.
  36. Duncan PW, Lai SM, Bode RK, Perera S, De Rosa J: Stroke Impact Scale-16: a brief assessment of physical function. Neurology 2003;60:291–296.
  37. Muus I, Williams LS, Ringsberg KC: Validation of the Stroke Specific Quality of Life Scale (SS-QOL): test of reliability and validity of the Danish version (SS-QOL-DK). Clin Rehabil 2007;21:620–627.
  38. Pickard AS, Johnson JA, Feeny DH: Responsiveness of generic health-related quality of life measures in stroke. Qual Life Res 2005;14:207–219.
  39. Sneeuw K, Aaronson N, De Haan R, Limburg M: Assessing quality of life after stroke. Stroke 1997;28:1541–1549.
  40. Pickard AS, Johnson JA, Feeny DH, Shuaib A, Carriere KC, Nasser AM: Agreement between patient and proxy assessment of health-related quality of life after stroke using the EQ-5D and health utilities index. Stroke 2004;35:607–612.
  41. Duncan PW, Lai SM, Tyler D, Perera S, Reker DM, Studenski S: Evaluation of proxy responses to the Stroke Impact Scale. Stroke 2002;33:2593–2599.
  42. Williams LS, Bakas T, Brizendine E, Plue L, Tu W, Hendrie H, Kroenke K: How valid are family proxy assessments of stroke patients’ health-related quality of life? Stroke 2006;37:2081–2085.
  43. Hilari K, Owen S, Farrelly SJ: Proxy and self-report agreement on the Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale-39. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2007;78:1072–1075.
  44. Clarke P, Marshall V, Black SE, Colantonio A: Well-being after stroke in Canadian seniors. Findings from the Canadian Study of Health and Aging. Stroke 2002;33:1016–1021.
  45. Nichols-Larsen DS, Clark PC, Zeringue A, Greenspan A, Blanton S: Factors influencing stroke survivors’ quality of life during subacute recovery. Stroke 2005;36:1480–1484.
  46. van de Port IG, Kwakkel G, Schepers VP, Heinemans CT, Lindeman E: Is fatigue an independent factor associated with activities of daily living, instrumental activities of daily living and health-related quality of life in chronic stroke? Cerebrovasc Dis 2007;23:40–45.
  47. Grenthe Olsson B, Sunnerhagen KS: Functional and cognitive capacity and health-related quality of life 2 years after day hospital rehabilitation for stroke: a prospective study. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2007;16:208–215.
  48. Gargano JW, Reeves MJ, Paul Coverdell National Acute Stroke Registry Michigan Prototype Investigators: Sex differences in stroke recovery and stroke-specific quality of life: results from a statewide stroke registry. Stroke 2007;38:2541–2548.
  49. Di Carlo A, Lamassa M, Baldereschi M, Pracucci G, Basile AM, Wolfe CD, Giroud M, Rudd A, Ghetti A, Inzitari D, European BIOMED Study of Stroke Care Group: Sex differences in the clinical presentation, resource use, and 3-month outcome of acute stroke in Europe: data from a multicenter multinational hospital-based registry. Stroke 2003;34:1114–1119.
  50. Gray LJ, Sprigg N, Bath PM, Boysen G, De Deyn PP, Leys D, O’Neill D, Ringelstein EB, TAIST Investigators: Sex differences in quality of life in stroke survivors: data from the Tinzaparin in Acute Ischaemic Stroke Trial (TAIST). Stroke 2007;38:2960–2964.
  51. Rønning OM, Stavem K: Determinants of change in quality of life from 1 to 6 months following acute stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis 2007;25:67–73.
    External Resources
  52. Patel MD, McKevitt C, Lawrence E, Rudd AG, Wolfe CD: Clinical determinants of long-term quality of life after stroke. Age Ageing 2007;36:316–322.
  53. White JH, Alston MK, Marquez JL, Sweetapple AL, Pollack MR, Attia J, Levi CR, Sturm J, Whyte S: Community-dwelling stroke survivors: function is not the whole story with quality of life. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007;88:1140–1146.
  54. Paul SL, Sturm JW, Dewey HM, Donnan GA, Macdonell RA, Thrift AG: Long-term outcome in the North East Melbourne Stroke Incidence Study: predictors of quality of life at 5 years after stroke. Stroke 2005;36:2082–2086.
  55. Naess H, Waje-Andreassen U, Thomassen L, Nyland H, Myhr KM: Health-related quality of life among young adults with ischemic stroke on long-term follow-up. Stroke 2006;37:1232–1236.
  56. Anderson CS, Carter KN, Brownlee WJ, Hackett ML, Broad JB, Bonita R: Very long-term outcome after stroke in Auckland, New Zealand. Stroke 2004;35:1920–1924.
  57. Hopman WM, Verner J: Quality of life during and after inpatient stroke rehabilitation. Stroke 2003;34:801–805.
  58. Madden S, Hopman WM, Bagg S, Verner J, O’Callaghan CJ: Functional status and health-related quality of life during inpatient stroke rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2006;85:831–838.
  59. Sturm JW, Donnan GA, Dewey HM, Macdonell RA, Gilligan AK, Srikanth V, Thrift AG: Quality of life after stroke: the North East Melbourne Stroke Incidence Study (NEMESIS). Stroke 2004;35:2340–2345.
  60. Lindgren I, Jönsson AC, Norrving B, Lindgren A: Shoulder pain after stroke: a prospective population-based study. Stroke 2007;38:343–348.
  61. Jönsson AC, Lindgren I, Hallström B, Norrving B, Lindgren A: Prevalence and intensity of pain after stroke: a population based study focusing on patients’ perspectives. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2006;77:590–595.
  62. Carod J, Egido J, González JL, Varela de Seijas E: Poststroke sexual dysfunction and quality of life. Stroke 1999;30:2238–2239.
  63. Korpelainen JT, Nieminen P, Myllylä VV: Sexual functioning among stroke patients and their spouses. Stroke 1999;30:715–719.
  64. Lazarus RS, Folkman S: Stress, Appraisal and Coping. New York, Springer, 1984.
  65. Rochette A, Bravo G, Desrosiers J, St-Cyr Tribble D, Bourget A: Adaptation process, participation and depression over six months in first-stroke individuals and spouses. Clin Rehabil 2007;21:554–562.
  66. Forsberg-Wärleby G, Möller A, Blomstrand C: Psychological well-being of spouses of stroke patients during the first year after stroke. Clin Rehabil 2004;18:430–437.
  67. Darlington AS, Dippel DW, Ribbers GM, van Balen R, Passchier J, Busschbach JJ: Coping strategies as determinants of quality of life in stroke patients: a longitudinal study. Cerebrovasc Dis 2007;23:401–407.
  68. Bluvol A, Ford-Gilboe M: Hope, health work and quality of life in families of stroke survivors. J Adv Nurs 2004;48:322–332.
  69. Carod Artal FJ: Post-stroke depression (I). Epidemiology, diagnostic criteria and risk factors. Rev Neurol2006;42:169–175.
  70. Kwok T, Lo RS, Wong E, Wai-Kwong T, Mok V, Kai-Sing W: Quality of life of stroke survivors: a 1-year follow-up study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006;87:1177–1182.
  71. Lai SM, Studenski S, Duncan P, Perera S: Persisting consequences of stroke measured by the Stroke Impact Scale. Stroke 2002;33:1840–1844.
  72. Rombough RE, Howse EL, Bagg SD, Bartfay WJ: A comparison of studies on the quality of life of primary caregivers of stroke survivors: a systematic review of the literature. Top Stroke Rehab 2007;14:69–79.
  73. Carod-Artal FJ, Egido JA, González-Gutiérrez JL, Varela de Seijas E: Perception of long term overload in care-givers of patients who have survived a stroke. Rev Neurol 1999;28:1130–1138.
  74. Jönsson AC, Lindgren I, Hallström B, Norrving B, Lindgren A: Determinants of quality of life in stroke survivors and their informal caregivers. Stroke 2005;36:803–808.
  75. McCullagh E, Brigstocke G, Donaldson N, Kalra L: Determinants of caregiving burden and quality of life in caregivers of stroke patients. Stroke 2005;36:2181–2186.
  76. Rochette A, Desrosiers J, Bravo G, Tribble DS, Bourget A: Changes in participation level after spouse’s first stroke and relationship to burden and depressive symptoms. Cerebrovasc Dis 2007;24:255–260.
  77. Forsberg-Wärleby G, Möller A, Blomstrand C: Spouses of first-ever stroke patients: psychological well-being in the first phase after stroke. Stroke 2001;32:1646–1651.
    External Resources
  78. Scholte op Reimer WJ, de Haan RJ, Rijnders PT, Limburg M, van den Bos GA: The burden of caregiving in partners of long-term stroke survivors. Stroke 1998;29:1605–1611.
  79. Morimoto T, Schreiner AS, Asano H: Caregiver burden and health-related quality of life among Japanese stroke caregivers. Age Ageing 2003;32:218–223.
  80. Bethoux F, Camels P, Gautheron V, Minaire P: Quality of life of the spouses of stroke patients: a preliminary study. Int J Rehab Res 1996;19:291–299.
  81. Hung SY, Pickard AS, Witt WP, Lambert BL: Pain and depression in caregivers affected their perception of pain in stroke patients. J Clin Epidemiol 2007;60:963–970.
  82. Mant J, Carter J, Wade DT, Winner S: Family support for stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2000;356:808–813.
  83. Studenski S, Duncan PW, Perera S, Reker D, Lai SM, Richards L: Daily functioning and quality of life in a randomized controlled trial of therapeutic exercise for subacute stroke survivors. Stroke 2005;36:1764–1770.
  84. Boter H, HESTIA Study Group: Multicenter randomized controlled trial of an outreach nursing support program for recently discharged stroke patients. Stroke 2004;35:2867–2872.
  85. Leeds L, Meara J, Hobson P: The impact of discharge to a care home on longer term stroke outcomes. Clin Rehabil 2004;18:924–928.
  86. Kalra L, Evans A, Perez I, Melbourn A, Patel A, Knapp M, Donaldson N: Training carers of stroke patients: randomized controlled trial. BMJ 2004;328:1099–1103.
  87. Lees KR, Zivin JA, Ashwood T, Davalos A, Davis SM, Diener HC, Grotta J, Lyden P, Shuaib A, Hardemark HG, Wasiewski WW; Stroke-Acute Ischemic NXY Treatment (SAINT I) Trial Investigators: NXY-059 for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2006;354:588–600.

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Recovery after Stroke: Strategies to Improve

Published online: April 03, 2009
Issue release date: April 2009

Number of Print Pages: 11
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 8

ISSN: 1015-9770 (Print)
eISSN: 1421-9786 (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/CED


Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.