Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders

Original Research Article

Validation Study of the Mini-Mental State Examination in a Malay-Speaking Elderly Population in Malaysia

Ibrahim N.M.a · Shohaimi S.d · Chong H.-T.c · Rahman A.H.A.b · Razali R.b · Esther E.c · Basri H.B.a

Author affiliations

Departments of aMedicine and bPsychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Center, and cDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, University Malaya Medical Center, Kuala Lumpur, and dDepartment of Biology, University Putra Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia

Related Articles for ""

Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2009;27:247–253

Log in to MyKarger to check if you already have access to this content.


Buy

  • FullText & PDF
  • Unlimited re-access via MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

CHF 38.00 *
EUR 35.00 *
USD 39.00 *

Select

KAB

Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!


If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.


Save over 20% compared to the individual article price.

Learn more

Rent/Cloud

  • Rent for 48h to view
  • Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
  • Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
  • Printing and saving restrictions apply

Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00

Select

Subscribe

  • Access to all articles of the subscribed year(s) guaranteed for 5 years
  • Unlimited re-access via Subscriber Login or MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

Subcription rates


Select
* The final prices may differ from the prices shown due to specifics of VAT rules.

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Original Research Article

Accepted: October 31, 2008
Published online: February 25, 2009
Issue release date: March 2009

Number of Print Pages: 7
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 5

ISSN: 1420-8008 (Print)
eISSN: 1421-9824 (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/DEM

Abstract

Background/Aims: In view of the differing sensitivity and specificity of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) in the non-English-speaking populations, we conducted the first validation study of the Malay version (M-MMSE) in Malaysia among 300 subjects (from the community and outpatient clinics). Methods: Three versions were used: M-MMSE-7 (serial 7), M-MMSE-3 (serial 3) and M-MMSE-S (spell ‘dunia’ backwards). Dementia was assessed using the criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders IV. The optimal cutoff scores were obtained from the receiver operating characteristics curves. Results: Seventy-three patients (24.3%) had dementia and 227 (75.7%) were controls. Three hundred patients completed the M-MMSE-7, 160 the M-MMSE-3 and 145 the M-MMSE-S. All 3 versions were valid and reliable in the diagnosis of dementia. The optimal cutoff scores varied with each version and gender. In the control group, significant gender differences were observed in the patients with the lowest educational status. Increasing educational levels significantly improved the M-MMSE performance in both genders. Conclusion: All 3 versions of the M-MMSE are valid and reliable as a screening tool for dementia in the Malaysian population, but at different cutoff scores. In those with the lowest educational background, gender-adjusted cutoff scores should be applied.

© 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel




Related Articles:


References

  1. Folstein M, Folstein SE, McHugh PR: ‘Mini-Mental State’: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975;12:189–198.
  2. Eefsting JA, Boersma F, van Tilburg W, van den Brink W: Usefulness of the ‘Mini-Mental State Test’ for the diagnosis of dementia: study of criterion validity in a Dutch rural population (abstract). Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 1997;141:2066–2070.
  3. Komori K, HironoN, Tanabe H: The validity of the MMSE and SMQ as screening tests for dementia in the elderly general population – a study of one rural community in Japan.Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2000;11:193–196.
  4. Monsch AU, Foldi NS, Ermini-Fünfschilling DE, Berres M, Taylor KI, Seifritz E, Stähelin HB, Spiegel R: Improving the diagnostic accuracy of the Mini-Mental State Examination. Acta Neurol Scand 1995;92:145–150.
  5. Black SA, Espino DV, Mahurin R, Lichtenstein MJ, Hazuda HP, Fabrizio D, Ray LA, Markides KS: The influence of non-cognitive factors on the Mini-Mental State examination in older Mexican-Americans: findings from the Hispanic EPESE. J Clin Epidemiol 1999;52:1095–1102.
  6. Borson S, Scanlan JM, Watanabe J, Tu SP, Lessig M: Simplifying detection of cognitive impairment: comparison of the Mini-Cog and Mini-Mental State Examination in a multiethnic sample. J Am Geriatr Soc 2005;53:871–874.
  7. Jones RN, Gallo JJ: Education and sex differences in the Mini-Mental State Examination: effects of differential item functioning. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2002;57:548–558.
  8. Uhlmann RF, Larson EB: Effect of education on the Mini-Mental State Examination as a screening test for dementia. J Am Geriatr Soc 1991;39:876–880.
  9. Grigoletto F, Zappalà G, Anderson DW, Lebowitz BD: Norms for the Mini-Mental State Examination in a healthy population. Articles Neurol 1999;53:315.
  10. Department of Statistics of Malaysia. http://www.statistics.gov.my/english/frameshift_keystatistics (accessed 25th March 2008).
  11. Deraman AA: The development of the Malay language: contemporary challenges. http://English.gdufs.edu.cn/article_show.asp/article ID = 82 (accessed 25th March 2008).
  12. Tham W, Auchus AP, Thong M, Goh ML, Chang HM, Wong MC, Chen CPLH: Progression of cognitive impairment after stroke: one-year results from a longitudinal study of Singaporean stroke patients. J Neurol Sci 2002;203–204:49–52.
  13. Ng TP, Niti M, Chiam PC, Kua EH: Ethnic and educational differences in cognitive test performance on Mini Mental State Examination in Asians. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2007;15:130–139.
  14. Rosselli M, Ardila A, Rosas P: Neuropsychological assessment in illiterates II. Brain Cogn 1990;12:281–186.
  15. Ostrosky-Solis F, Lopes-Arango G, Ardila A: Sensitivity and specificity of the Mini-Mental State Examination in a Spanish-speaking population. Appl Neuropsychol 2000;7:25–31.
  16. Escobar JI, Burnam A, Karno M, Forsythe A, Lansverk J, Golding JM: Use of the Mini-Mental State Exmaination (MMSE) in a community population of mixed ethnicity. J Nerv Ment Dis 1986;174:607–614.
  17. Rosselli M, Tappen R, William C, Salvatiera J: The relation of education and gender on the attention items of the Mini-Mental State Examination in Spanish-speaking Hispanic elders. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 2006;21:677–688.
  18. Espino DV, Lichtenstein MJ, Palmer RF, Hazuda HP: Evaluation of the Mini-Mental State Examination’s internal consistency in a community-based sample of Mexican-American and European-American elders: results from the San Antonio Longitudinal Study of Aging. J Am Geriatr Soc 2004:52:822–827.
  19. D’Alessandro R, Pandolfo G, Azzimondi G, Feruglio FS: Prevalence of dementia among elderly people in Troina, Sicily. Eur J Epidemiol 1996;12:595–599.

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Original Research Article

Accepted: October 31, 2008
Published online: February 25, 2009
Issue release date: March 2009

Number of Print Pages: 7
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 5

ISSN: 1420-8008 (Print)
eISSN: 1421-9824 (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/DEM


Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
TOP