Background: Stroke is a major cause of morbidity and death in the United States. We tested the association between familial risk for stroke and prevalence of the disease among US adults and assessed the use of family history of stroke as a risk assessment tool for the disease. Methods: Using data from the 2005 HealthStyles survey (n = 4,819), we explored the association between familial stroke risk (stratified as high, moderate or low) and the prevalence of stroke and related health conditions. We evaluated the clinical validity (sensitivity, specificity) of family history of stroke as an indicator of stroke risk. Stroke and the related medical conditions were self-reported. Results: Independent of other risk factors, people with a high familial risk for stroke were 4 times more likely to have had a stroke (95% confidence interval, CI, 2.6–6.0) than people with moderate or low familial risk. They were also 1.3 times (95% CI 1.1–1.6) more likely to have high blood pressure and 1.5 times (95% CI 1.3–2.0) more likely to have congestive heart failure. The sensitivity and specificity of using family history alone, high blood pressure alone or both risk factors to estimate stroke risk were 52 and 83%, 53 and 74%, and 29 and 95%, respectively. Conclusions: Despite several limitations typical of self-reported surveys, we find that in this sample of US adults, family history of stroke was significantly associated with the risk for stroke and high blood pressure as well as related conditions. Family history of stroke, alone or combined with other risk factors, can be a useful tool in assessing stroke risk among US adults.

Keywords:
Family history, Risk factors, Stroke, Transient ischemic attack
1.
Rosamond W, Flegal K, Friday G, Furie K, Go A, Greenlund K, Haase N, Ho M, Howard V, Kissela B, Kittner SJ, Lloyd-Jones D, McDermott M, Meigs J, Moy C, Nichol G, O’Donnell CJ, Roger V, Rumsfeld J, Sorlie P, Steinberger J, Thom T, Wasserthiel-Smoller S, Hong Y, American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee: Heart disease and stroke statistics – 2007 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation 2007;115:e69–e171.
2.
Stroke: Hope Through Research. Bethesda, National Institutes of Health, 2004. http://www.ninds.nih.gov/disorders/stroke/detail_stroke.htm (accessed March 21, 2008).
3.
Liao D, Myers R, Hunt S, Shahar E, Paton C, Burke G, Province M, Heiss G: Familial history of stroke and stroke risk. The Family Heart Study. Stroke 1997;28:1908–1912.
4.
Tentschert S, Greisenegger S, Wimmer R, Lang W, Lalouschek W: Association of parental history of stroke with clinical parameters in patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack. Stroke 2003;34:2114–2119.
5.
Jousilahti P, Rastenyte D, Tuomilehto J, Sarti C, Vartiainen E: Parental history of cardiovascular disease and risk of stroke. A prospective follow-up of 14,371 middle-aged men and women in Finland. Stroke 1997;28:1361–1366.
6.
Khaw KT, Barrett-Connor E: Family history of stroke as an independent predictor of ischemic heart disease in men and stroke in women. Am J Epidemiol 1986;123:59–66.
7.
Wannamethee SG, Shaper AG, Ebrahim S: History of parental death from stroke or heart trouble and the risk of stroke in middle-aged men. Stroke 1996;27:1492–1498.
8.
Jood K, Ladenvall C, Rosengren A, Blomstrand C, Jern C: Family history in ischemic stroke before 70 years of age: the Sahlgrenska Academy Study on Ischemic Stroke. Stroke 2005;36:1383–1387.
9.
Jerrard-Dunne P, Cloud G, Hassan A, Markus HS: Evaluating the genetic component of ischemic stroke subtypes: a family history study. Stroke 2003;34:1364–1369.
10.
Scheuner MT, Whitworth WC, McGruder H, Yoon PW, Khoury MJ: Expanding the definition of a positive family history for early-onset coronary heart disease. Genet Med 2006;8:491–501.
11.
Guttmacher AE, Collins FS, Carmona RH: The family history – more important than ever. N Engl J Med 2004;351:2333–2336.
12.
Stata Statistical Software: Release 9. College Station, StataCorp LP, 2005.
13.
Kim H, Friedlander Y, Longstreth WT Jr, Edwards KL, Schwartz SM, Siscovick DS: Family history as a risk factor for stroke in young women. Am J Prev Med 2004;27:391–396.
14.
Flossmann E, Schulz UGR, Rothwell PM: Systematic review of methods and results of studies of the genetic epidemiology of ischemic stroke. Stroke 2004;35:212–227.
15.
Kiely DK, Wolf PA, Cupples LA, Beiser AS, Myers RH: Familial aggregation of stroke. The Framingham Study. Stroke 2003;24:1366–1371.
16.
MacClellan LR, Mitchell BD, Cole JW, Wozniak MA, Stern BJ, Giles WH, Brown DW, Sparks MJ, Kittner SJ: Familial aggregation of Ischemic stroke in young women: the Stroke Prevention in Young Women Study. Genet Epidemiol 2006;30:602–608.
17.
American Heart Association: Stroke Risk Factors. http://www.americanheart.org/presenter.jhtml?identifier=4716 (accessed January 11, 2008).
18.
Hertzberg SV, Weiss P, Stern BJ, Frankel MR: Family history associated with improved functional outcome following ischemic stroke. Neuroepidemiology 2006;27:74–80.
19.
Graffagnino C, Gasecki AP, Doig GS, Hachinski VC: The importance of family history in cerebrovascular disease. Stroke 1994;25:1599–1604.
20.
Levine BJ, Levine DW: How accurately could we screen for individual risk? Using summary data to examine discriminatory accuracy of a risk marker. Prev Med 2007;45:342–347.
21.
Wald NJ, Hackshaw AK, Frost CD: When can a risk factor be used as a worthwhile screening test. BMJ 1999;319:1562–1565.
22.
Pepe MS, Janes H, Longton G, Leisenring W, Newcomb P: Limitations of the odds ratio in gauging the performance of a diagnostic prognosis, or screening marker. Am J Epidemiol 2004;159:882–890.
23.
Goldstein LB, Adams R, Alberts MJ, Appel LJ, Brass LM, Bushnell CD, Culebras A, DeGraba TJ, Gorelick PB, Guyton JR, Hart RG, Howard G, Kelly-Hayes M, Nixon JV, Sacco RL: Primary prevention of ischemic stroke: a guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council: Cosponsored by the Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease Interdisciplinary Working Group; Cardiovascular Nursing Council; Clinical Cardiology Council; Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism Council; and the Quality of Care and Outcomes Research Interdisciplinary Working Group. Circulation 2006;113:e873–e923.
24.
Winnicki M, Somers VK, Dorigatti F, Longo D, Santonastaso M, Mos L, Mattarei M, Pessina AC, Palatini P: Lifestyle, family history and progression of hypertension. J Hypertens 2006;24:1479–1487.
25.
Bergmann MM, Byers T, Freedman DS, Mokdad A: Validity of self-reported diagnoses leading to hospitalization: a comparison of self-reports with hospital records in a prospective study of American adults. Am J Epidemiol 1998;147:969–977.
26.
Simpson CF, Boyd CM, Carlson MC, Griswold ME, Guralnik JM, Fried LP: Agreement between self-report of disease diagnoses and medical record validation in disabled older women: factors that modify agreement. J Am Geriatr Soc 2004;52:123–127.
27.
St Sauver JL, Hagen PT, Cha SS, Bagniewski SM, Mandrekar JN, Curoe AM, Rodeheffer RJ, Roger VL, Jacobsen SJ: Agreement between patient reports of cardiovascular disease and patient medical records. Mayo Clin Proc 2005;80:203–210.
28.
Klungel OH, de Boer A, Paes AH, Seidell JC, Bakker A: Cardiovascular diseases and risk factors in a population-based study in the Netherlands: agreement between questionnaire information and medical records. Neth J Med 1999;55:177–183.
29.
Pollard WE: Use of consumer panel survey data for public health communication planning: an evaluation of survey results; in Proceedings of the Section on Health Policy Statistics. Alexandria, American Statistical Association, 2002, pp 2720–2724.
30.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): Prevalence of stroke – United States, 2005. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2007;56:469–474.
31.
Campbell KP, Lanza A, Dixon R, Chattopadhyay S, Molinari N, Finch RA (eds): A Purchaser’s Guide to Clinical Preventive Services: Moving Science into Coverage. Washington DC, National Business Group on Health, 2007.
© 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel
2009
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.