Login to MyKarger

New to MyKarger? Click here to sign up.

Login with Facebook

Forgot your password?

Authors, Editors, Reviewers

For Manuscript Submission, Check or Review Login please go to Submission Websites List.

Submission Websites List

Institutional Login
(Shibboleth or Open Athens)

For the academic login, please select your country in the dropdown list. You will be redirected to verify your credentials.

Free Access

UK Renal Registry 11th Annual Report (December 2008): Chapter 5 Demographics and biochemistry profile of kidney transplant recipients in the UK in 2007: national and centre-specific analyses

Ravanan R.a · Udayaraj U.b · Steenkamp R.b · Ansell D.b

Author affiliations

a University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK; bUK Renal Registry, Bristol, UK

Corresponding Author

Rommel Ravanan, UK Renal Registry, Southmead Hospital, Southmead Road, Bristol BS10 5NB, UK, Email: rommel.ravanan@cardiffandvale.wales.nhs.uk

Related Articles for ""

Nephron Clin Pract 2009;111(suppl 1):c69–c96

Do you have an account?

Login Information

Contact Information

I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.


Introduction: Outcomes following renal transplantation are usually reported as graft or patient survival. However, graft function, haemoglobin and blood pressure are also important measures of quality of care. Methods: Transplant activity and incident graft survival data were obtained from NHS Blood and Transplant (NHSBT), laboratory and clinical variables and prevalent survival data were obtained from the UK Renal Registry (UKRR). Data were analysed separately for prevalent and one year post-transplant patients. Results: Increasing live and non-heartbeating donors were responsible for the increasing transplant activity. Transplant waiting list numbers continued to rise by 8%. Graft failure occurred in 3.2% of prevalent transplant patients. Death rates remained stable at 2.3/100 patient years. Malignancy accounted for 21% of these deaths. There was centre variation in outcomes such as eGFR and haemoglobin in prevalent and 1 year post-transplant recipients. Analysis of prevalent transplants by chronic kidney disease stage showed 16% with eGFR <30 and 2.2% <15. Of those in stage 5T, 26% had Hb <10 g/dl, 27% phosphate ≥ 1.8 mmol/L and 50% an iPTH ≥ 32 pmol/L. These patients were less likely to achieve the UK standards in comparison to CKD5 dialysis patients. Conclusion: Wide variations in clinical and biochemical outcomes may be secondary to variations in the care administered to transplant recipients across the UK.

© 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Paper

Published online: March 26, 2009
Issue release date: March 2009

Number of Print Pages: 1
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 0

eISSN: 1660-2110 (Online)

For additional information: http://www.karger.com/NEC

Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.