Are Hydrogen Breath Tests Valid in the Elderly?Mac Mahon M.a · Gibbons N.b · Mullins E.d · O’;Moore R.R.c · Keane C.T.b · Walsh J.B.a · Coakley D.a
aMercer’s Institute for Research on Ageing; Departments of bClinical Microbiology and cBiochemistry, St. James’ Hospital, and dDepartment of Statistics, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland
Do you have an account?
- Rent for 48h to view
- Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
- Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
- Printing and saving restrictions apply
Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00
Article / Publication Details
Hydrogen breath testing (HBT) is frequently used as an alternative to small bowel aspiration in the diagnosis of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO). The role of the glucose HBT was assessed in 30 elderly patients. A positive HBT was recorded in 15 of 20 SIBO cases and 7 of 10 culture negatives (sensitivity 75% and specificity 30%). The correlation coefficients between hydrogen gas (H2) rise and total bacterial count (r = 0.21) and H2 rise and anaerobic count (r = 0) were not significant. Fasting H2 levels were raised in only 4 of the 20 SIBO cases. This study indicates that the HBT is not reliable in the diagnosis of SIBO in the elderly. There was no evidence from the data that different H2 levels or bacterial counts would significantly alter the reliability of the HBT. This work suggests that factors other than small bowel bacteria are involved in the production and expiration of H2 in the elderly, and that these factors need to be considered in the interpretation of this breath test.
© 1996 S. Karger AG, Basel
Article / Publication Details
Copyright / Drug Dosage / DisclaimerCopyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher or, in the case of photocopying, direct payment of a specified fee to the Copyright Clearance Center.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.