Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica

 

Recent Developments in Speech Motor Research into Stuttering

Peters H.F.M.a · Hulstijn W.b · van Lieshout P.H.H.M.c

Author affiliations

aDepartment of Voice and Speech Pathology, University Hospital Nijmegen bNijmegen Institute of Cognition and Information, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands cDepartment of Speech-Language Pathology, University of Toronto, Canada

Related Articles for ""

Folia Phoniatr Logop 2000;52:103–119

Log in to MyKarger to check if you already have access to this content.


Buy

  • FullText & PDF
  • Unlimited re-access via MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

CHF 38.00 *
EUR 35.00 *
USD 39.00 *

Select

KAB

Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!


If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.


Save over 20% compared to the individual article price.

Learn more

Rent/Cloud

  • Rent for 48h to view
  • Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
  • Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
  • Printing and saving restrictions apply

Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00

Select

Subscribe

  • Access to all articles of the subscribed year(s) guaranteed for 5 years
  • Unlimited re-access via Subscriber Login or MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

Subcription rates


Select
* The final prices may differ from the prices shown due to specifics of VAT rules.

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Paper

Published online: August 17, 1999
Issue release date: January – June

Number of Print Pages: 17
Number of Figures: 5
Number of Tables: 0

ISSN: 1021-7762 (Print)
eISSN: 1421-9972 (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/FPL

Abstract

This paper discusses recent speech motor research into stuttering within the framework of a speech production model. There seems to be no support for the claim that stutterers differ from nonstutterers in assembling motor plans for speech. However, physiological data suggest that stutterers may at least have different ways of initiating and controlling speech movements. It is hypothesized that stuttering may be the result of a deficiency in speech motor skill. Furthermore, objections to the use of stuttering frequency as a severity index are formulated and future developments in the assessment of speech motor behavior in stuttering are described.




Related Articles:


References

  1. Brutten EJ, Shoemaker DJ: The Modification of Stuttering. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall, 1967.
  2. Sheehan JC: Conflict theory and avoidance reduction therapy; in Eisenson J (ed): Stuttering: A Second Symposium. New York, Harper, 1975.
  3. Bloodstein O: Handbook on Stuttering. Chicago, National Easter Seal Society for Crippled Children and Adults. 1969, 1981.
  4. Peters HFM, Hulstijn W: Stuttering and anxiety: The difference between stutterers and nonstutterers in verbal apprehension and physiologic arousal during the anticipation of speech and non-speech tasks. J Fluency Disord 1984;9:67–84.
    External Resources
  5. Janssen P, Kraaimaat F: Disfluency and anxiety in stuttering and adolescents. Behav Analysis Modif 1980;4:116–126.
  6. Gray BB, Karmen JL: The relationship between nonverbal anxiety and stuttering adaptation. J Commun Disord 1967;1:114–122.
  7. Freeman F, Ushijima T: Laryngeal muscle activity during stuttering. J Speech Hear Res 1978;21:538–562.
    External Resources
  8. Adams MR: A physiologic and aerodynamic interpretation of fluent and stuttered speech. J Fluency Disord 1974;1:35–47.
  9. Zimmerman G: Articulatory dynamics of fluent utterances of stutterers and nonstutterers. J Speech Hear Res 1980;23:95–107.
    External Resources
  10. Zimmerman G: Stuttering: A disorder of movement. J Speech Hear Res 1980;23:122–136.
  11. Van Riper CG: The Nature of Stuttering. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall, 1982.
  12. Kent RD: Stuttering as a temporal programming disorder; in Curlec RF, Perkins WWH (eds): Nature and Treatment of Stuttering: New Directions. New York, Elsevier/North-Holland, pp 283–301.
  13. Wingate ME: Stuttering: Theory and Treatment. New York, Irvington, 1976.
  14. Peters HFM, Hulstijn W, Starkweather WC: Acoustic and physiologic reaction times of stutterers and nonstutterers. J Speech Hear Res 1989;32:668–680.
    External Resources
  15. Peters HFM, Hulstijn W (eds): Speech Motor Dynamics in Stuttering. Vienna, Springer, 1989.
  16. Peters HFM, Hulstijn W, Starkweather WC (eds): Speech Motor Control and Stuttering. Amsterdam, Elsevier Science, 1991.
  17. Hulstijn W, Peters HFM, Van Lieshout PHHM (eds): Speech Production: Motor Control, Brain Research and Fluency Disorders. Amsterdam, Elsevier, 1997.
  18. Levelt WJM: Speaking: From Intention to Articulation. Cambridge, MIT Press, 1989.
  19. Levelt WJM: Accessing words in speech production: Stages, processes and representation. Cognition 1992;42:1–22.
  20. Peters HFM, Starkweather WC: The interaction between speech motor coordination and language processes in the development of stuttering: Hypotheses and suggestions for research. J Fluency Disord 1990;15:115–125.
    External Resources
  21. Kinsbourne M, Hicks RE: Mapping cerebral functional space: Competition and collaboration in human performance; in Kinsbourne M (ed): Asymmetrical Function of the Brain. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1978.
  22. Bosshardt H-G: Speech fluency under dual-task conditions; in Healey EC, Peters HFM (eds): Proc 2nd World Congr on Fluency Disord. Nijmegen, Nijmegen University Press, 1998.
  23. Bernstein Ratner N: Linguistic and perceptual characteristics of children at stuttering onset; in Healey EC, Peters HFM (eds): Proc 2nd World Congr on Fluency Disord. Nijmegen, Nijmegen University Press, 1998.
  24. Sternberg S, Monsell S, Knoll RL, Wright CE: The latency and duration of rapid movement sequences: Comparisons of speech and typewriting; in Stelmach GE (ed): Information Processing in Motor Control and Learning. New York, Academic Press, 1978, pp 117–152.
  25. Stelmach GA (ed): Information Processing in Motor Control and Learning. New York, Academic Press, 1978.
  26. Van Lieshout PHHM: Motor Planning and Articulation in Fluent Speech of Stutterers and Nonstutterers. Nijmegen, Nijmegen University Press, 1995.
  27. Postma A, Kolk H: The covert repair hypothesis: Prearticulary to repair processes in normal and stuttered disfluencies. J Speech Hear Res 1993;36:472–487.
  28. Postma A, Kolk H: Speech errors, disfluencies, and self-repairs in stutterers in two accuracy conditions. J Fluency Disord 1990;15:291–303.
    External Resources
  29. Postma A, Kolk H: Error monitoring in people who stutter: Evidence against auditory feedback theories. J Speech Hear Res 1992;35:1024–1032.
  30. Van Lieshout PHHM, Hulstijn W, Peters HFM: Speech production in people who stutter: Testing the motor plan assembly hypothesis. J Speech Hear Res 1996;39:76–92.
  31. Van Lieshout PHHM, Hulstijn W, Peters HFM: From planning to articulation: What differentiates a person who stutters from a person who does not stutter? J Speech Hear Res 1996;39:546–564.
  32. Kent RD: Speech motor models and developments in neurophysiological sciences: New perspectives; in Hulstijn W, Peters HFM, Van Lieshout PHHM (eds): Speech Production: Motor Control, Brain Research and Fluency Disorders. Amsterdam, Elsevier, 1997, pp 13–36.
  33. Kalvaram KT, Natke U: Stuttering and misguided learning of articulation and phonation or why it is extremely difficult to measure the physical properties of limbs; in Hulstijn W, Peters HFM, Van Lieshout PHHM (eds): Speech Production: Motor Control, Brain Research and Fluency Disorders. Amsterdam, Elsevier, 1997, pp 89–98.
  34. Ludlow CL, Siren K, Zikria M: Speech production learning in adults with chronic developmental stuttering; in Hulstijn W, Peters, HFM, Van Lieshout PHHM (eds): Speech Production: Motor Control, Brain Research and Fluency Disorders. Amsterdam, Elsevier, 1997, pp 221–230.
  35. McLean MD: Functional components of the motor system: An approach to understanding the mechanisms of speech disfluency; in Hulstijn W, Peters HFM, Van Lieshout PHHM (eds): Speech Production: Motor Control, Brain Research and Fluency Disorders. Amsterdam, Elsevier, 1997, pp 221–230.
  36. De Nil LF: The role of oral sensory feedback in the coordination of articulatory movements in adults who stutter. J Fluency Disord 1994;19:169–170.
    External Resources
  37. Grosjean M, Van Galen G, De Jong P, Van Lieshout PHHM, Hulstijn W: Is stuttering caused by failing neuromuscular force control? in Hulstijn W, Peters HFM, Van Lieshout PHHM (eds): Speech Production: Motor Control, Brain Research and Fluency Disorders. Amsterdam, Elsevier, 1997, pp 197–204.
  38. Kelso JAS: Dynamic Patterns: The Self-Organization of Brain and Behavior. Cambridge, MIT Press, 1995.
  39. Van Lieshout PHHM, Hulstijn W, Alfonso P, Peters HFM: Electromagnetic midsagittal articulography (EMMA); in Maarse FJ, Akkermans AE, Brand AN, Mulser LJM, vd Stelt MJ (eds): Computers in Psychology: Applications, Methods and Instrumentation. Lisse, Swets & Zeitlinger, 1995, pp 62–76.
  40. Tuller B, Kelso JAS: Phrase transitions in speech production and their perceptual consequences; in Jeannerod M (ed): Motor Representation and Control. Hillsdale, Erlbaum, 1990, pp 429–452.
  41. Gracco VL, Abbs HJ: Programming and execution processes of speech movement control: Potential neural correlates; in Keller E, Gopnik M (eds): Motor and Sensory Processes of Language. Hillsdale, Erlbaum, 1987, pp 163–201.
  42. Kaufman SA: At the Home of the Universe. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1995.
  43. Smith A: Dynamic interactions of factors that impact speech motor stability in children and adults; in Hulstijn W, Peters HFM, Van Lieshout PHHM (eds): Speech Production: Motor Control, Brain Research and Fluency Disorders. Amsterdam, Elsevier, pp 143–149.
  44. Alfonso PJ: Subject definition and selection criteria for stuttering research in adult subjects; in Cooper JA (ed): Research Needs in Stuttering: Roadblocks and Future Directions. ASHA Rep No 18, Rockville, ASHA, pp 15–24.
  45. Cordes AK, Ingham RJ: The reliability of observational data. II. Issues in the identification and measurement of stuttering events. J Speech Hear Res 1994;20:55–71.
  46. Peters HFM, Boves L: Coordination of aerodynamics and phonatory processes in fluent speech utterances of stutterers. J Speech Hear Res 1989;31:352–361.
  47. Peters HFM, Hietkamp RK, Boves L: Aerodynamic and phonatory processes in disfluent speech utterances in stutterers; in Starkweather CW, Peters HFM (eds): Proc 1st World Congr on Fluency Disord. Nijmegen, Nijmegen University Press, 1985, pp 76–81.
  48. Peters HFM, Hulstijn W, Van Lieshout PHHM: Towards a Nijmegen speech motor test; in Starkweather CW, Peters HFM (eds): Proc 1st World Congr on Fluency Disord. Nijmegen, Nijmegen University Press, 1985, pp 15–19.
  49. Peters HFM: Clinical application of speech measurement techniques in the assessment of stuttering; in Assessment of Speech and Voice Production: Research and Clinical Applications. NIDCD Monogr. Bethesda, NIH, 1991, vol 1.

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Paper

Published online: August 17, 1999
Issue release date: January – June

Number of Print Pages: 17
Number of Figures: 5
Number of Tables: 0

ISSN: 1021-7762 (Print)
eISSN: 1421-9972 (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/FPL


Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
TOP