Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica

Original Paper

Stotterreduktion bei frequenzverschobener und verzögerter auditiver Rückmeldung

Natke U.

Author affiliations

Institut für Allgemeine Psychologie, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Düsseldorf, Deutschland

Keywords: StutteringFrequency-shifted auditory feedbackDelayed auditory feedback

Related Articles for ""
Folia Phoniatr Logop 2000;52:151–159
https://doi.org/10.1159/000021530

Log in to MyKarger to check if you already have access to this content.




Forgot your password
Sign up to MyKarger

Buy

  • FullText & PDF
  • Unlimited re-access via MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more
CHF 38.00 *
EUR 35.00 *
USD 39.00 *

Select

KAB

Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!


If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.

Save over 20% compared to the individual article price.

Learn more

Rent/Cloud

  • Rent for 48h to view
  • Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
  • Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
  • Printing and saving restrictions apply
Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00

Select

Subscribe

  • Access to all articles of the subscribed year(s) guaranteed for 5 years
  • Unlimited re-access via Subscriber Login or MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

Subcription rates

Select
* The final prices may differ from the prices shown due to specifics of VAT rules.

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Original Paper

Published online: April 28, 2000
Issue release date: July – August

Number of Print Pages: 9
Number of Figures: 2
Number of Tables: 2

ISSN: 1021-7762 (Print)
eISSN: 1421-9972 (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/FPL

Abstract

Bei 12 stotternden Probanden wurde die stotterreduzierende Wirkung von verzögerter auditiver Rückmeldung (DAF) und frequenzverschobener auditiver Rückmeldung (FAF) miteinander verglichen. Hierzu wurden drei Texte mit jeweils 300 Silben unter simultaner auditiver Rückmeldung, DAF (Verzögerungszeit: 53 ms) und FAF (Frequenzverschiebung: –½ Oktave) gelesen sowie anschliessend die Stotterrate bzw. der Prozentsatz unflüssiger Sprechzeit bestimmt. Nur unter DAF zeigte sich in den Gruppenwerten ein stotterreduzierender Effekt, nicht jedoch unter FAF. Bei 4 Probanden trat unter FAF dennoch eine Stotterreduktion von über 50% auf. Es wird gefolgert, dass der Einsatz von FAF als prothetische Massnahme beschränkt ist. Der Zusammenhang zwischen prolongiertem Sprechen und Stotterreduktion wird diskutiert.



Related Articles:

Literatur

  1. Johnson W, Rosen I: Effects of certain changes in speech patterns upon frequency of stuttering. J Speech Disord 1937;2:101–104.
  2. Cherry C, Sayers B: Experiments upon the total inhibition of stammering by external control, and some clinical results. J Psychosom Res 1956;1:233–246.
    External Resources
  3. Neelley JN: A study of the speech behavior of stutterers and nonstutterers under normal and delayed auditory feedback. J Speech Hear Disord 1961, Suppl 7, 63–82.
  4. Barber V: Studies in the psychology of stuttering, XVI: Rhythm as a distraction in stuttering. J Speech Dis 1940;5:29–42.
  5. Webster RL, Lubker BB: Masking of auditory feedback in stutterers’ speech. J Speech Hear Res 1968;11:221–222.
    External Resources
  6. Stromsta C: A methodology related to the determination of the phase angle of bone-conducted speech sound energy of stutterers and nonstutterers. Speech Monogr 1957;24:147–148.
  7. Wingate ME: Stuttering: Theory and Treatment. New York, Irvington, 1976.
  8. Perkins WH: From psychoanalysis to discoordination; in Gregory HH (ed): Controversies about Stuttering Therapy. Baltimore, University Park Press, 1979, pp 97–127.
  9. Howell P, El-Yaniv N, Powell DJ: Factors affecting fluency in stutterers when speaking under altered auditory feedback; in Peters HFM, Hulstijn W (eds): Speech Motor Dynamics in Stuttering. New York, Springer, 1987, pp 361–369.
  10. Hargrave S, Kalinowski J, Stuart A, Armson J, Jones K: Effect of frequency-altered feedback on stuttering frequency at normal and fast speech rates. J Speech Hear Res 1994;37:1313–1319.
    External Resources
  11. Stuart A, Kalinowski J, Armson J, Stenstrom R, Jones K: Fluency effect of frequency alterations of plus/minus one-half and one-quarter octave shifts in auditory feedback of people who stutter. J Speech Hear Res 1996;39:396–401.
    External Resources
  12. Kalinowski J, Armson J, Roland-Mieszkowski M, Stuart A, Gracco VL: Effects of alterations in auditory feedback and speech rate on stuttering frequency. Lang Speech 1993;36:1–16.
    External Resources
  13. MacLeod J, Kalinowski J, Stuart A, Armson J: Effect of single and combined altered auditory feedback on stuttering frequency at two speech rates. J Commun Disord 1995;28:217–228.
    External Resources
  14. Ingham RJ, Moglia RA, Frank P, Ingham JC, Cordes AK: Experimental investigation of the effects of frequency-altered auditory feedback on the speech of adults who stutter. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1997;40:361–372.
    External Resources
  15. Kalinowski J, Stuart A, Rastatter MP, Miller RK, Zimmermann S, Shine R: Examination of altered auditory feedback: Therapeutic implications; in Healey EC, Peters HFM (eds): Proceedings of the 2nd World Congress on Fluency Disorders. The International Fluency Association, 1998, pp 54–57.
  16. Armson J, Stuart A: Effect of extended exposure to frequency-altered feedback on stuttering during reading and monologue. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1998;41:479–490.
    External Resources
  17. Riley GD: A Stuttering Severity Instrument for children and adults. J Speech Hear Disord 1972;37:314–322.
    External Resources
  18. Lotzmann G: Zur Anwendung variierter Verzögerungszeiten bei Balbuties. Folia Phoniatr 1961;13:276–312.
  19. Starkweather CW: Issues in the efficacy of treatment for fluency disorders. J Fluency Disord 1993;18:151–168.
    External Resources
  20. Natke U, Grosser J: Intra- and interrater reliability in determining the percentage of discontinuous speech time (PDST). J Speech Lang Hear Res (eingereicht).
  21. Young MA: Identification of stuttering and stutterers; in Curlee R, Perkins W (eds): Nature and Treatment of Stuttering: New Directions. San Diego, College-Hill Press, 1984, pp 31–48.
  22. Wingate ME: Sound and pattern in ‘artificial’ fluency. J Speech Hear Res 1969;12:677–686.
    External Resources
  23. Ingham RJ, Montgomery J, Ulliana L: The effect of manipulating phonation duration on stuttering. J Speech Hear Res 1983;26:579–587.
    External Resources
  24. Stuart A, Kalinowski J: Fluent speech, fast articulatory rate, and delayed auditory feedback: Creating a crisis for a scientific revolution? Percept Mot Skills 1996;82:211–218.
    External Resources
  25. Bloodstein O: A Handbook on Stuttering, ed 5. Chicago, National Easter Seal Society, 1995.
  26. Kalveram KT, Jäncke L: Vowel duration and voice onset time for stressed and nonstressed syllables in stutterers under delayed auditory feedback condition. Folia Phoniatr 1989;41:30–42.
    External Resources
  27. Jäncke L: The ‘audio-phonatoric coupling’ in stuttering and nonstuttering adults: Experimental contributions; in Peters HFM, Hulstijn W, Starkweather CW (eds): Speech Motor Control and Stuttering. Amsterdam, Elsevier Science, 1991, pp 171–180.
  28. Natke U: Die audio-phonatorische Kopplung als grundlegender Mechanismus der Sprechflusskontrolle bei stotternden und nichtstotternden Personen. Hannover, Unser Verlag, 1999.
  29. Stager SV, Ludlow CL: Speech production changes under fluency-evoking conditions in nonstuttering speakers. J Speech Hear Res 1993;36:245–253.
    External Resources
  30. Natke U, Kalveram KT: Effects of frequency-shifted auditory feedback on fundamental frequency and vowel duration in long stressed and unstressed syllables. J Acoust Soc Am (eingereicht).
  31. Burnett TA, Senner JE, Larson CR: Voice F0 responses to pitch-shifted auditory feedback: A preliminary study. J Voice 1997;11:202–211.
    External Resources
  32. Ramig P, Adams MR: Rate reduction strategies used by stutterers and nonstutterers during high- and low-pitched speech. J Fluency Disord 1980;5:27–41.
    External Resources
  33. Ramig P, Adams MR: Vocal changes in stutterers and nonstutterers during high- and low-pitched speech. J Fluency Disord 1981;7:15–33.
    External Resources
  34. Natke U: Effekte unter modifizierter auditiver Rückmeldung: Sprechflüssigkeit, Phonationsdauer und Grundfrequenz bei stotternden und nichtstotternden Personen; in Lotzmann G (ed): Selbstwahrnehmung und Fremdwahrnehmung bei Sprach-, Sprech, Stimm- und Hörstörungen. Würzburg, Edition Bentheim, 1999.
  35. Starkweather CW: Fluency and Stuttering. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall, 1987.

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Original Paper

Published online: April 28, 2000
Issue release date: July – August

Number of Print Pages: 9
Number of Figures: 2
Number of Tables: 2

ISSN: 1021-7762 (Print)
eISSN: 1421-9972 (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/FPL

Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

Article Tools
Article Details

2000, Vol.52, No. 4

July – August

Article

Recommend This
TOP