Login to MyKarger

New to MyKarger? Click here to sign up.



Login with Facebook

Forgot your password?

Authors, Editors, Reviewers

For Manuscript Submission, Check or Review Login please go to Submission Websites List.

Submission Websites List

Institutional Login
(Shibboleth or Open Athens)

For the academic login, please select your country in the dropdown list. You will be redirected to verify your credentials.

Original Paper

Validation of a German Version of the Confusion Assessment Method for Delirium Detection in a Sample of Acute Geriatric Patients with a High Prevalence of Dementia

Hestermann U.a · Backenstrass M.b · Gekle I.c · Hack M.a · Mundt C.b · Oster P.a · Thomas C.b, d

Author affiliations

aBethanien Hospital, Geriatric Center at the University Hospital Heidelberg, bCenter for Psychosocial Medicine, Department of Adult Psychiatry, and cInstitute of Gerontology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, and dGeriatric Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ev. Hospital Bielefeld-Bethel, Bielefeld, Germany

Related Articles for ""

Psychopathology 2009;42:270–276

Do you have an account?

Login Information





Contact Information












By signing up for MyKarger you will automatically participate in our year-End raffle.
If you Then Do Not wish To participate, please uncheck the following box.

Yes, I wish To participate In the year-End raffle And Get the chance To win some Of our most interesting books, And other attractive prizes.


I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.



Login Information





Contact Information












By signing up for MyKarger you will automatically participate in our year-End raffle.
If you Then Do Not wish To participate, please uncheck the following box.

Yes, I wish To participate In the year-End raffle And Get the chance To win some Of our most interesting books, And other attractive prizes.


I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.



To view the fulltext, please log in

To view the pdf, please log in

Buy

  • FullText & PDF
  • Unlimited re-access via MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

CHF 38.00 *
EUR 35.00 *
USD 39.00 *

Select

KAB

Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!

If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.


Save over 20% compared to the individual article price.
Learn more

Rent/Cloud

  • Rent for 48h to view
  • Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
  • Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
  • Printing and saving restrictions apply

Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00


Select

Subscribe

  • Access to all articles of the subscribed year(s) guaranteed for 5 years
  • Unlimited re-access via Subscriber Login or MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

Subcription rates


Select

* The final prices may differ from the prices shown due to specifics of VAT rules.

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Original Paper

Received: March 01, 2007
Accepted: January 15, 2008
Published online: June 12, 2009
Issue release date: June 2009

Number of Print Pages: 7
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 3

ISSN: 0254-4962 (Print)
eISSN: 1423-033X (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/PSP

Abstract

Objectives: To assess validity and interrater reliability of an operationalized German version of the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) in geriatric patients with comorbid dementia and high delirium risk. Design: Prospective cross-sectional cohort study with double CAM assessment by a medical and nonmedical rater. Setting: Random sample of frail, cognitively impaired elderly with acute disease requiring hospital care. Participants: A total of 39 frail elderly, mean age 83 ± 7 years, 72% (n = 28) female, with cognitive impairments, a high prevalence of dementia (86%, n = 33) and a significant risk of delirium. Of these, 13 revealed delirium, which was superimposed on dementia in 11. Measurements: A translated and operationalized version of the CAM was validated against a neuropsychiatric and geriatric consensus reference standard based on DSM-IV. Additional measures included the Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire, the Mini-Mental State Examination and the Delirium Index for cognitive impairment severity, the Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline for dementia diagnosis and the Barthel Index, illness severity (Cumulative Illness Rating Scale) and medication. Results: Delirium was correctly detected by CAM algorithm in 10 out of 13 delirious patients resulting in a high sensitivity of 0.77 and a specificity of 0.96–1.00 for both raters. Likelihood ratio revealed an almost 20-fold risk of delirium with positive CAM testing. Interrater reliability was excellent with a Cohen’s ĸ of 0.95 (CI 0.74–1.0) for the algorithm, single items’ ĸ values varied between 0.5 and 1. Conclusions: The German CAM is a reliable and valid measure of delirium, even in frail, acutely diseased elderly with concomitant dementia.

© 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel


References

  1. Cole MG: Delirium in elderly patients. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2004;12:7–21.
  2. Inouye SK: Delirium in older persons. N Engl J Med 2006;354:1157–1165.
  3. Pompei P, Foreman M, Rudberg MA, et al: Delirium in hospitalized older persons: outcomes and predictors. J Am Geriatr Soc 1994;42:809–815.
  4. Siddiqi N, House AO, Holmes JD: Occurrence and outcome of delirium in medical in-patients: a systematic literature review. Age Ageing 2006;35:350–364.
  5. Lindesay J, Rockwood K, Macdonald A: Delirium in Old Age. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2002.
  6. Marcantonio ER, Kiely DK, Simon SE, et al: Outcomes of older people admitted to postacute facilities with delirium. J Am Geriatr Soc 2005;53:963–969.
  7. O’Keeffe ST, Lavan J: The prognostic significance of delirium in older hospital patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 1997;45:174–178.
  8. McCusker J, Cole M, Dendukuri N, et al: Delirium in older medical inpatients and subsequent cognitive and functional status: a prospective study. CMAJ 2001;165:575–583.
  9. Rockwood K, Cosway S, Stolee P, et al: Increasing the recognition of delirium in elderly patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 1994;42:252–256.
  10. Inouye SK, Foreman MD, Mion LC, et al: Nurses’ recognition of delirium and its symptoms: comparison of nurse and researcher ratings. Arch Intern Med 2001;161:2467–2473.
  11. Elie M, Cole MG, Primeau FJ, et al: Delirium risk factors in elderly hospitalized patients. J Gen Intern Med 1998;13:204–212.
  12. Fick DM, Agostini JV, Inouye SK: Delirium superimposed on dementia: a systematic review. J Am Geriatr Soc 2002;50:1723–1732.
  13. Inouye SK, van Dyck CH, Alessi CA, et al: Clarifying confusion: the confusion assessment method. A new method for detection of delirium. Ann Intern Med 1990;113:941–948.
  14. Laurila JV, Pitkala KH, Strandberg TE, et al: Confusion assessment method in the diagnostics of delirium among aged hospital patients: would it serve better in screening than as a diagnostic instrument? Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2002;17:1112–1119.
  15. Jorm AF, Christensen H, Henderson AS, et al: Informant ratings of cognitive decline of elderly people: relationship to longitudinal change on cognitive tests. Age Ageing 1996;25:126–129.
  16. Rolfson DB, McElhaney JE, Rockwood K, et al: Incidence and risk factors for delirium and other adverse outcomes in older adults after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Can J Cardiol 1999;15:771–776.
  17. Adamis D, Treloar A, MacDonald AJ, et al: Concurrent validity of two instruments (the Confusion Assessment Method and the Delirium Rating Scale) in the detection of delirium among older medical inpatients. Age Ageing 2005;34:72–75.
  18. Trzepacz PT, Mulsant BH, Amanda Dew M, et al: Is delirium different when it occurs in dementia? A study using the delirium rating scale. J Neuropsychiatr Clin Neurosci 1998;10:199–204.
  19. Jorm AF: A short form of the Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE): development and cross-validation. Psychol Med 1994;24:145–153.
  20. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR: ‘Mini-mental state’: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975;12:189–198.
  21. Lemiengre J, Nelis T, Joosten E, et al: Detection of delirium by bedside nurses using the confusion assessment method. J Am Geriatr Soc 2006;54:685–689.
  22. Inouye SK: CAM Training Manual. New Haven, Yale University School of Medicine, 1991.
  23. Pfeiffer E: A short portable mental status questionnaire for the assessment of organic brain deficit in elderly patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 1975;23:433–441.
  24. DSM-IV: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, ed 4. Washington, American Psychiatric Association, 1994, pp 124–133.
  25. ICD-10: The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders. Geneva, World Health Organization, 1992.
  26. McCusker J, Cole M, Bellavance F, et al: Reliability and validity of a new measure of severity of delirium. Int Psychogeriatr 1998;10:421–433.
  27. Jorm AF: The Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE): a review. Int Psychogeriatr 2004;16:275–293.
  28. McCusker J, Cole MG, Dendukuri N, et al: The Delirium Index, a measure of the severity of delirium: new findings on reliability, validity, and responsiveness. J Am Geriatr Soc 2004;52:1744–1749.
  29. Parmelee PA, Thuras PD, Katz IR, et al: Validation of the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale in a geriatric residential population. J Am Geriatr Soc 1995;43:130–137.
  30. Landis JR, Koch GG: The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159–174.

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Original Paper

Received: March 01, 2007
Accepted: January 15, 2008
Published online: June 12, 2009
Issue release date: June 2009

Number of Print Pages: 7
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 3

ISSN: 0254-4962 (Print)
eISSN: 1423-033X (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/PSP


Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.