Login to MyKarger

New to MyKarger? Click here to sign up.

Login with Facebook

Forgot your password?

Authors, Editors, Reviewers

For Manuscript Submission, Check or Review Login please go to Submission Websites List.

Submission Websites List

Institutional Login
(Shibboleth or Open Athens)

For the academic login, please select your country in the dropdown list. You will be redirected to verify your credentials.

Original Research Article

Free Access

Increased Risk for Falling Associated with Subtle Cognitive Impairment: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial

Gleason C.E.a, c · Gangnon R.E.b · Fischer B.L.d · Mahoney J.E.a

Author affiliations

aSection of Geriatrics and Gerontology, Department of Medicine, and bDepartments of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics and Population Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin, cGeriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center (GRECC), and dMental Health Service, William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, Madison, Wisc., USA

Corresponding Author

Carey E. Gleason, PhD

Section of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin

Madison VA GRECC, Room D4211, 2500 Overlook Terrace

Madison, WI 53705 (USA)

Tel. +1 608 256 1901, ext. 17000, Fax +1 608 280 7165, E-Mail ceg@medicine.wisc.edu

Related Articles for ""

Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2009;27:557–563

Do you have an account?

Login Information

Contact Information

I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.


Background/Aims: Having dementia increases patients’ risk for accidental falls. However, it is unknown if having mild cognitive deficits also elevates a person’s risk for falls. This study sought to clarify the relationship between subtle cognitive impairment, measured with a widely-used, clinic-based assessment, the Mini Mental State Exam (MMSE), and risk for falls. Methods: In a secondary analysis of the Kenosha County Falls Prevention Study, a randomized controlled trial targeting older adults at risk for falls, we examined the association between baseline MMSE and prospective rate of falls over 12 months in 172 subjects randomized to control group. Results: Using univariate analysis, the rate of falls increased with each unit decrease in MMSE score down to at least 22 (rate ratio 1.25, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.09–1.45, p = 0.0026). Using stepwise multivariate regression, controlling for ability to perform activities of daily living, use of assistive device, current exercise, and arthritis, the association between MMSE score and falls rate persisted (rate ratio 1.20, 95% CI 1.03–1.40, p = 0.021). Conclusion: Minimal decrements on the MMSE were associated with elevations in rate of falls, suggesting that subtle cognitive deficits reflected in MMSE scores above a cut-off consistent with a diagnosis of dementia, can influence risk for falls.

© 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Original Research Article

Accepted: March 17, 2009
Published online: July 11, 2009
Issue release date: July 2009

Number of Print Pages: 7
Number of Figures: 1
Number of Tables: 3

ISSN: 1420-8008 (Print)
eISSN: 1421-9824 (Online)

For additional information: http://www.karger.com/DEM

Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.