Differences in the Diagnostic Procedures
Risk of Radiation and Choice of ImagingHerfarth H. · Palmer L.
Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, N.C., USA
Do you have an account?
- Rent for 48h to view
- Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
- Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
- Printing and saving restrictions apply
Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00
Radiological imaging plays an important role in the diagnosis and management of patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). The barium or contrast techniques enteroclysis (SBE) and small bowel follow through (SBFT) are still the mainstays in small bowel imaging. However, abdominal CT and MRI, including enteroclysis, have comparable sensitivity and specificity in detecting intestinal pathologies and have gained in popularity over conventional techniques. The cancer risk associated with diagnostic procedures employing radiation has been receiving increasing attention over the last few years. The cumulative exposure to ionizing radiation may be a specific concern in young patients with IBD, who are more susceptible than adults to the risks of ionizing radiation. Substantial exposure to radiation seems to be mainly caused by CT examinations of the abdomen. For that reason, imaging methods such as MRI or ultrasound should be considered first when debating between alternative imaging strategies, particularly in young IBD patients. The major drawbacks of MRI are its limited availability and greater costs compared to CT. Moreover, the diagnostic accuracy of abdominal ultrasound is clearly operator dependent, which limits the range of its applications. In light of these concerns, diagnostic imaging studies using radiation will continue to play an important role in the evaluation of patients with IBD. Therefore, we need to develop low-radiation imaging protocols or improve access to MRI imaging procedures. We also need to identify subsets of IBD patients who are at greater risk of a significant lifetime exposure to radiation and develop methods to monitor their radiation exposure rate.
© 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel
Article / Publication Details
Copyright / Drug Dosage / DisclaimerCopyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.