Mortality Trends Associated with Acute Renal Failure Requiring Dialysis after CABG Surgery in the United StatesNicoara A.a · Patel U.D.b · Phillips-Bute B.G.a · Shaw A.D.a · Stafford-Smith M.a · Milano C.A.c · Swaminathan M.a
aDivision of Cardiothoracic Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, bDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, and Duke Clinical Research Institute, and cDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, N.C., USA
Do you have an account?
- Rent for 48h to view
- Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
- Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
- Printing and saving restrictions apply
Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00
Article / Publication Details
Background/Aims: Acute renal failure is associated with a high risk of mortality when it complicates coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. We examined a large nationwide database from 1988 to 2003 and hypothesized that mortality in CABG-associated acute renal failure needing dialysis (ARF-D) had declined during this period. Methods: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample containing data on inpatient stays across 20% of US hospitals was used for our study. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine an association between year and ARF-D mortality with standardized risk adjustment. Results: Incidence of ARF-D increased from 0.2 to 0.6% while mortality simultaneously decreased from 47.4% in 1988 to 29.7% in 2003. In the multivariable model, year was significantly associated with declining ARF-D mortality. Conclusions: The incidence of post-CABG ARF-D more than doubled from 1988 to 2003, while mortality simultaneously decreased by over one-third. Improved survival after ARF-D following CABG may be counterbalanced by increased morbidity and resource utilization.
© 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel
Article / Publication Details
Copyright / Drug Dosage / DisclaimerCopyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.