Comparative Dental Morphology
14th International Symposium on Dental Morphology, Greifswald, August 2008: Selected papersEditor(s): Koppe T. (Greifswald)
Meyer G. (Greifswald)
Alt K.W. (Mainz)
Brook A. (Liverpool)
Dean M.C. (London)
Kjaer I. (Copenhagen)
Lukacs J.R. (Eugene, Oreg.)
Smith B.H. (Ann Arbor, Mich.)
Teaford M.F. (Baltimore, Md.)
Dentary Tooth Shape in Sphenodon and Its Fossil Relatives (Diapsida: Lepidosauria: Rhynchocephalia)Jones M.E.H.
Research Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, UCL, University College London, London, UK
Do you have an account?
- Rent for 48h to view
- Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
- Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
- Printing and saving restrictions apply
Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00
Background: Today Rhynchocephalia, the sister tax-on to Squamata (snakes, lizards and amphisbaenians), is only represented by the tuatara (Sphenodon) of New Zealand. However, for much of the Mesozoic, the group was speciose and globally distributed. Historically, the Rhynchocephalia were considered to be homogenous and unspecialized but new fossils and new research are overturning this view. As well as differences in body size, body proportions, habit (aquatic vs. terrestrial), and skull structure, their teeth show variation in shape, size, number, arrangement and enamel thickness. This suggests differences in diet and mode of feeding. The teeth of basal taxa tend to be relatively simple and conical, whereas those of derived taxa possess complex flanges and wear facets. Methods: Dimensions of the dentary tooth bases were measured in apical view for a large sample of rhynchocephalian taxa. Results: These measurements reveal three general tooth types: small ovoid teeth, large wide teeth, and large elongate teeth. Conclusion: These three categories correspond to food processing as inferred from tooth wear (puncturing+crushing, grinding+shredding and tearing+cutting, respectively). A phylogenetic signal is also present as the teeth of basal taxa generally conform to the first category. The larger tooth bases of derived taxa provide stronger attachment and contribute to a stouter tooth shape more resistant to loading and torsional forces. This in turn corresponds to skull architecture because the skulls of derived taxa could accommodate larger jaw muscles with a greater leverage relative to basal taxa.
© 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel
Article / Publication Details
Copyright / Drug Dosage / DisclaimerCopyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.