Login to MyKarger

New to MyKarger? Click here to sign up.



Login with Facebook

Forgot your password?

Authors, Editors, Reviewers

For Manuscript Submission, Check or Review Login please go to Submission Websites List.

Submission Websites List

Institutional Login
(Shibboleth or Open Athens)

For the academic login, please select your country in the dropdown list. You will be redirected to verify your credentials.

Comparative Dental Morphology

14th International Symposium on Dental Morphology, Greifswald, August 2008: Selected papers

Editor(s): Koppe T. (Greifswald) 
Meyer G. (Greifswald) 
Alt K.W. (Mainz) 
Brook A. (Liverpool) 
Dean M.C. (London) 
Kjaer I. (Copenhagen) 
Lukacs J.R. (Eugene, Oreg.) 
Smith B.H. (Ann Arbor, Mich.) 
Teaford M.F. (Baltimore, Md.) 
Cover

Dental Evolution

Molar Crown and Root Size Relationship in Anthropoid Primates

Kupczik K. · Olejniczak A.J. · Skinner M.M. · Hublin J.-J.

Author affiliations

Department of Human Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany

Related Articles for ""

Koppe T, Meyer G, Alt KW (eds): Comparative Dental Morphology. Front Oral Biol. Basel, Karger, 2009, vol 13, pp 16–22

Do you have an account?

Login Information





Contact Information










I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.



Login Information





Contact Information










I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.



To view the fulltext, please log in

To view the pdf, please log in

Buy

  • FullText & PDF
  • Unlimited re-access via MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

CHF 38.00 *
EUR 35.00 *
USD 39.00 *

Select

KAB

Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!

If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.


Save over 20% compared to the individual article price.
Learn more

Rent/Cloud

  • Rent for 48h to view
  • Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
  • Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
  • Printing and saving restrictions apply

Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00


Select

Complete book

  • Immediate access to all parts of this book
  • Cover-to-cover formats may be available
  • Unlimited re-access via MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restriction for personal use
read more

Pricing depends on hard-cover price


Select

* The final prices may differ from the prices shown due to specifics of VAT rules.

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Dental Evolution

Published online: September 21, 2009
Cover Date: 2009

Number of Print Pages: 7
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 0

ISBN: 978-3-8055-9229-1 (Print)
eISBN: 978-3-8055-9230-7 (Online)

Abstract

Mandibular corpus form is thought to reflect masticatory function and the size of the dentition, but there is no universal association between crown dimensions and corpus size across anthropoids. Previous research was based on the assumption that crown size is an appropriate proxy for overall tooth size, but this hypothesis remains largely untested. This study assesses the relationship between the volume and surface area of molar crowns and roots by examining two main hypotheses: (1) crown size correlates significantly with root size, and (2) the proportion of root-to-crown surface area is related to dietary proclivity. Permanent M2s (n = 58) representing 19 anthropoid species were CT scanned and the volume and surface area of the crown and root were measured. Interspecific correlation and regression analyses reveal significant isometric relationships between crown and root volume and a positive allometric relationship between root and crown surface area (i.e. as crown surface area increases, root surface area becomes disproportionately greater). Intraspecifically, crown and root surface area correlate significantly in some species where such analyses were possible. In general, hard object feeders exhibit relatively larger root surface area per unit crown surface area compared to soft and tough object feeders. The results also show that despite differences in food specialization closely related species have similar root-to-crown surface area proportions, thus indicating a strong phylogenetic influence. Since it is possible that, at least in some species, crown and root size vary independently, future studies should elucidate the relationship between tooth root size and mandible form.

© 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel


References

  1. Plavcan JM, Daegling DJ: Interspecific and intraspecific relationships between tooth size and jaw size in primates. J Hum Evol 2006;51:171-184
  2. Garn SM, Van Alstine WL, Cole PE: Relationship between root lengths and crown diameters of corresponding teeth. J Dent Res 1978;57:636
  3. Ozaki T, Satake T, Kanazawa E: Morphological significance of root length variability in comparison with other crown dimensions. II. Correlation between crown and root measurements. J Nih Univ S Dent 1988;30:11-21
  4. Spencer MA: Tooth-root form and function in platyrrhine seed-eaters. Am J Phys Anthrop 2003;122:325-335
  5. Kupczik K, Dean MC: Comparative observations on the tooth root morphology of Gigantopithecus blacki. J Hum Evol 2008;54:196-204
  6. Kovacs I: A systematic description of dental roots. (eds) Dahlberg AA: Dental Morphology and Evolution Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1971;211-256
  7. Kinzey WG: Ceboid models for the evolution of hominoid dentition. J Hum Evol 1974;3:193-203
  8. Kay RF: The nut-crackers: a new theory of the adaptations of the Ramapitheci-nae. Am J Phys Anthrop 1981;55:141-151
  9. Lambert JE, Chapman CA, Wrangham RW, Conklin-Brittain NL: Hardness of cercopithecine foods: implications for the critical function of enamel thickness in exploiting fallback foods. Am J Phys Anthrop 2004;125:363-368
  10. Palombit RA: Inter- and intraspecific variation in the diets of sympatric siamang (Hylobates syndactylus) and lar gibbons (Hylobates lar). Folia Primatol 1997;68:321-337
  11. Lucas PW, Teaford MF: Functional morphology of colobine teeth. (eds) Davies AG, Oates JF: Colobine Monkeys: Their Ecology, Behaviour and Evolution Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1994;173-203
  12. Martin LB, Olejniczak AJ, Maas MC: Enamel thickness and microstructure in pitheciin primates, with comments on dietary adaptations of the middle Miocene hominoid Kenyapithecus. J Hum Evol 2003;45:351-367
  13. Taylor AB, Vogel ER, Dominy NJ: Food material properties and mandibular load resistance abilities in large-bodied hominoids. J Hum Evol 2008;55:604-616
  14. Vogel ER, van Woerden JT, Lucas PW, Utami Atmoko SS, van Schaik CP, Dominy NJ: Functional ecology and evolution of hominoid molar enamel thickness: Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii and Pongo pygmaeus wurmbii. J Hum Evol 2008;55:60-74
  15. Wolpoff MH: Some aspects of human mandibular evolution. (eds) McNamara JA, Jr: Determinants of Mandibular Form and Growth. Craniofacial Growth Series Ann Arbor, Center for Human Growth and Development, University of Michigan, 1975;4:1-64
  16. Wood BA: Allometry and hominid studies. (eds) Bishop WW: Geological Background to Fossil Man Edinburgh, Scottish Academic Press, 1978;125-128

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Dental Evolution

Published online: September 21, 2009
Cover Date: 2009

Number of Print Pages: 7
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 0

ISBN: 978-3-8055-9229-1 (Print)
eISBN: 978-3-8055-9230-7 (Online)


Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.