Cytogenetic and Genome Research

Original Article

Phylogeny of Horse Chromosome 5q in the Genus Equus and Centromere Repositioning

Piras F.M.a · Nergadze S.G.a · Poletto V.a · Cerutti F.a · Ryder O.A.b · Leeb T.c · Raimondi E.a · Giulotto E.a

Author affiliations

aDipartimento di Genetica e Microbiologia ‘Adriano Buzzati-Traverso’, Università di Pavia, Pavia, Italy; bConservation and Research for Endangered Species, Zoological Society of San Diego, San Diego, Calif., USA; cInstitute of Genetics, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland

Related Articles for ""

Cytogenet Genome Res 2009;126:165–172

Log in to MyKarger to check if you already have access to this content.


Buy

  • FullText & PDF
  • Unlimited re-access via MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

CHF 38.00 *
EUR 35.00 *
USD 39.00 *

Select

KAB

Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!


If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.


Save over 20% compared to the individual article price.

Learn more

Rent/Cloud

  • Rent for 48h to view
  • Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
  • Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
  • Printing and saving restrictions apply

Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00

Select

Subscribe

  • Access to all articles of the subscribed year(s) guaranteed for 5 years
  • Unlimited re-access via Subscriber Login or MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

Subcription rates


Select
* The final prices may differ from the prices shown due to specifics of VAT rules.

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Original Article

Accepted: July 13, 2009
Published online: December 09, 2009
Issue release date: December 2009

Number of Print Pages: 8
Number of Figures: 2
Number of Tables: 1

ISSN: 1424-8581 (Print)
eISSN: 1424-859X (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/CGR

Abstract

Horses, asses and zebras belong to the genus Equus and are the only extant species of the family Equidae in the order Perissodactyla. In a previous work we demonstrated that a key factor in the rapid karyotypic evolution of this genus was evolutionary centromere repositioning, that is, the shift of the centromeric function to a new position without alteration of the order of markers along the chromosome. In search of previously undiscovered evolutionarily new centromeres, we traced the phylogeny of horse chromosome 5, analyzing the order of BAC markers, derived from a horse genomic library, in 7 Equus species (E. caballus, E. hemionus onager, E. kiang, E. asinus, E. grevyi, E. burchelli and E. zebra hartmannae). This analysis showed that repositioned centromeres are present in E. asinus (domestic donkey, EAS) chromosome 16 and in E. burchelli (Burchell’s zebra, EBU) chromosome 17, confirming that centromere repositioning is a strikingly frequent phenomenon in this genus. The observation that the neocentromeres in EAS16 and EBU17 are in the same chromosomal position suggests that they may derive from the same event and therefore, E. asinus and E. burchelli may be more closely related than previously proposed; alternatively, 2 centromere repositioning events, involving the same chromosomal region, may have occurred independently in different lineages, pointing to the possible existence of hot spots for neocentromere formation. Our comparative analysis also showed that, while E. caballus chromosome 5 seems to represent the ancestral configuration, centric fission followed by independent fusion events gave rise to 3 different submetacentric chromosomes in other Equus lineages.

© 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel




Related Articles:


References

  1. Ahrens E, Stranzinger G: Comparative chromosomal studies of E. caballus (ECA) and E. przewalskii (EPR) in a female F1 hybrid. J Anim Breed Genet 122:97–102 (2005).
  2. Anglana M, Vigoni MT, Giulotto E: Four horse genomic fragments containing minisatellites detect highly polymorphic DNA fingerprints. Anim Genet 27:286 (1996).
  3. Bennet DK: Stripes do not a zebra make, part 1: a cladistic analysis of Equus. Syst Zool 29:272–287 (1980).
    External Resources
  4. Broad TE, Ede AJ, Forrest JW, Lewis PE, Phua SH, et al: Families of tandemly repeated DNA elements from horse: cloning, nucleotide sequence, and organization. Genome 38:1285–1289 (1995a).
  5. Broad TE, Forrest JW, Lewis PE, Pearce PD, Phua SH, et al: Cloning of a DNA repeat element from horse: DNA sequence and chromosomal localization. Genome 38:1132–1138 (1995b).
  6. Carbone L, Nergadze SG, Magnani E, Misceo D, Francesca Cardone M, et al: Evolutionary movement of centromeres in horse, donkey, and zebra. Genomics 87:777–782 (2006).
  7. Choo KH: Centromerization. Trends Cell Biol 10:182–188 (2000).
  8. Chowdhary BP, Raudsepp T, Kata SR, Goh G, Millon LV, et al: The first-generation whole-genome radiation hybrid map in the horse identifies conserved segments in human and mouse genomes. Genome Res 13:742–751 (2003).
  9. Flint J, Ryder OA, Clegg JB: Comparison of the alpha-globin gene cluster structure in Perissodactyla. J Mol Evol 30:36–42 (1990).
  10. George M, Ryder OA: Mitochondrial DNA evolution in the genus Equus. Mol Biol Evol 3:535–546 (1986).
  11. Harris AH, Porter LS: Late Pleistocene horses of Dry Cave, Eddy County, New Mexico. J Mammal 61:46–65 (1980).
    External Resources
  12. Houck ML, Ryder OA, Váhala J, Kock RA, Oosterhuis JE: Diploid chromosome number and chromosomal variation in the white rhinoceros (Ceratotherium simum). J Hered 85:30–34 (1994).
  13. Houck ML, Kingswood SC, Kumamoto AT: Comparative cytogenetics of tapirs, genus Tapirus (Perissodactyla, tapiridae). Cytogenet Cell Genet 89:110–115 (2000).
  14. Leeb T, Vogl C, Zhu B, de Jong PJ, Binns MM, et al: A human-horse comparative map based on equine BAC end sequences. Genomics 87:772–776 (2006).
  15. Lowenstein JM, Ryder OA: Immunological systematics of the extinct quagga (Equidae). Experientia 41:1192–1193 (1985).
  16. Milenkovic D, Oustry-Vaiman A, Lear TL, Billault A, Mariat D, et al: Cytogenetic localization of 136 genes in the horse: comparative mapping with the human genome. Mamm Genome 13:524–534 (2002).
  17. Murphy WJ, Frönicke L, O’Brien SJ, Stanyon R: The origin of human chromosome 1 and its homologs in placental mammals. Genome Res 13:1880–1888 (2003).
  18. Murphy WJ, Larkin DM, Everts-van der Wind A, Bourque G, Tesler G, et al: Dynamics of mammalian chromosome evolution inferred from multispecies comparative maps. Science 309:613–617 (2005).
  19. Musilova P, Kubickova S, Zrnova E, Horin P, Vahala J, et al: Karyotypic relationships among Equus grevyi, Equus burchelli and domestic horse defined using horse chromosome arm-specific probes. Chromosome Res 15:807–813 (2007).
  20. Myka JL, Lear TL, Houck ML, Ryder OA, Bailey E: FISH analysis comparing genome organization in the domestic horse (Equus caballus) to that of the Mongolian wild horse (E. przewalskii). Cytogenet Genome Res:222–225 (2003).
  21. Oakenfull EA, Clegg JB: Phylogenetic relationships within the genus Equus and the evolution of alpha and theta globin genes. J Mol Evol 47:772–783 (1998).
  22. Oakenfull EA, Lim HN, Ryder OA: A survey of equid mitochondrial DNA: implications for the evolution, genetic diversity and conservation of Equus. Conservation Genet 1:431–355 (2000).
    External Resources
  23. Raudsepp T, Frönicke L, Scherthan H, Gustavsson I, Chowdhary BP: Zoo-FISH delineates conserved chromosomal segments in horse and man. Chromosome Res 4:218–225 (1996).
  24. Raudsepp T, Gustafson-Seabury A, Durkin K, Wagner ML, Goh G, et al: A 4,103 marker integrated physical and comparative map of the horse genome. Cytogenet Genome Res 122:28–36 (2008).
  25. Ryder OA, Epel NC, Benirschke K: Chromosome banding studies of the Equidae. Cytogenet Cell Genet 20:332–350 (1978).
  26. Sakagami M, Hirota K, Awata T, Yasue H: Molecular cloning of an equine satellite-type DNA sequence and its chromosomal localization. Cytogenet Cell Genet 66:27–30 (1994).
  27. Trifonov VA, Stanyon R, Nesterenko AI, Fu B, Perelman PL, et al: Multidirectional cross-species painting illuminates the history of karyotypic evolution in Perissodactyla. Chromosome Res 16:89–107 (2008).
  28. Wijers ER, Zijlstra C, Lenstra JA: Rapid evolution of horse satellite DNA. Genomics 18:113–117 (1993).
  29. Wurster DH, Benirschke K: The chromosomes of the great Indian rhinoceros (Rhinoceros unicornis L.). Experientia 24:511 (1968).
  30. Yang F, Fu B, O’Brien PC, Robinson TJ, Ryder OA, et al: Karyotypic relationships of horses and zebras: results of cross-species chromosome painting. Cytogenet Genome Res 102:235–243 (2003).
  31. Yang F, Fu B, O’Brien PC, Nie W, Ryder OA, et al: Refined genome-wide comparative map of the domestic horse, donkey and human based on cross-species chromosome painting: insight into the occasional fertility of mules. Chromosome Res 12:65–76 (2004).

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Original Article

Accepted: July 13, 2009
Published online: December 09, 2009
Issue release date: December 2009

Number of Print Pages: 8
Number of Figures: 2
Number of Tables: 1

ISSN: 1424-8581 (Print)
eISSN: 1424-859X (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/CGR


Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
TOP