Neonatology

Original Paper

Free Access

Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist and Pressure Support Ventilation in Small Species and the Impact of Instrumental Dead Space

Campoccia Jalde F.a · Almadhoob A.R.b · Beck J.c–e · Slutsky A.S.e, f · Dunn M.S.c, d · Sinderby C.e, f

Author affiliations

aDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Karolinska Hospital and Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; bUniversity of Toronto Neonatal-Perinatal Integrated Fellowship Program, cWomen and Babies Program, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, dDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Toronto, eDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Keenan Research Centre in the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael’s Hospital, and fDepartment of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont., Canada

Corresponding Author

Jennifer Beck, PhD

Keenan Research Centre in the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael’s Hospital

30 Bond Street, Queen Wing 4-072

Toronto, ON M5B 1W8 (Canada)

Tel. +1 416 880 3664, Fax +1 416 760 7518, E-Mail beckj@smh.toronto.on.ca

Related Articles for ""

Neonatology 2010;97:279–285

Abstract

Background: Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) is a pneumatically-independent mode of mechanical ventilation controlled by diaphragm electrical activity (EAdi), and has not yet been implemented in very small species. Objectives: The aims of the study were to evaluate the feasibility of applying NAVA in very small species and to compare this to pressure support ventilation (PSV) in terms of ventilatory efficiency and breathing pattern, and evaluate the impact of instrumental dead space on breathing pattern during both modes. Methods: Nine healthy rats (mean weight 385 ± 4 g) were studied while breathing on PSV or NAVA, at baseline or with added dead space. Results: A clear difference in breathing pattern between NAVA and PSV was observed during both baseline and dead space, where PSV – despite similar EAdi and tidal volume as during NAVA – caused shortened inspiratory time (p < 0.05) and increased the respiratory rate (p < 0.05). A higher minute ventilation (p < 0.05) in order to reach the same arterial CO2 was observed. Ineffective inspiratory efforts occurred only during PSV and decreased with the dead space. Conclusion: This study demonstrates, in a small group of animals, that NAVA can deliver assist in very small species with a higher efficiency than PSV in terms of eliminating CO2 for a given minute ventilation.

© 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel




Related Articles:


References

  1. Beck J, Tucci M, Emeriaud G, Lacroix J, Sinderby C: Prolonged neural expiratory time induced by mechanical ventilation in infants. Pediatr Res 2004;55:747–754.
  2. Beck J, Campoccia F, Allo JC, Brander L, Brunet F, Slutsky AS, Sinderby C: Improved synchrony and respiratory unloading by neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) in lung-injured rabbits. Pediatr Res 2007;61:289–294.
  3. Beck J, Reilly MC, Grasselli G, Mirabella L, Slutsky AS, Dunn MS, Sinderby C: Patient-ventilator interaction during neurally adjusted ventilatory assist in very low birth weight infants. Ped Res 2009;65:663–668.
  4. Sinderby C, Navalesi P, Beck J, Skrobik Y, Comtois N, Friberg S, Gottfried SB, Lindström L: Neural control of mechanical ventilation in respiratory failure. Nat Med 1999;5:1433–1436.
  5. Allo JC, Beck JC, Brander L, Brunet F, Slutsky AS, Sinderby CA: Influence of neurally adjusted ventilatory assist and positive end-expiratory pressure on breathing pattern in rabbits with acute lung injury. Crit Care Med 2006;34:2997–3004.
  6. Beck J, Brander L, Slutsky AS, Reilly MC, Dunn MS, Sinderby C: Non-invasive neurally adjusted ventilatory assist in rabbits with acute lung injury. Intensive Care Med 2008;34:316–323.
  7. Goodyear-Bruch C, Long LR, Simon P, Clancy RL, Pierce JD: Pressure-support ventilation and diaphragm shortening in the rat model. AANA J 2005;73:277–283.
    External Resources
  8. Beck J, Sinderby C, Lindström L, Grassino A: Influence of bipolar esophageal electrode positioning on measurements of human crural diaphragm electromyogram. J Appl Physiol 1996;81:1434–1449.
  9. Sinderby C, Beck J, Lindström L, Grassino A: Enhancement of signal quality in esophageal recordings of diaphragm EMG. J Appl Physiol 1997;82:1370–1377.
  10. Aldrich T, Sinderby C, McKenzie D, Estenne M, Gandevia S: ATS/ERS statement on respiratory muscle testing – electrophysiologic techniques for the assessment of respiratory muscle function. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002;166:518–624.
  11. Nishimura M, Hess D, Kacmarek RM: The response of flow-triggered infant ventilators. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995;152:1901–1909.
  12. Smith CA, Rodman JR, Chenuel BJ, Henderson KS, Dempsey JA: Response time and sensitivity of the ventilatory response to CO2 in unanesthetized intact dogs: central vs. peripheral chemoreceptors. J Appl Physiol 2006;100:13–19.
  13. Palacek F: Measurement of ventilatory mechanics in the rat. J Appl Physiol 1969;27:149–156.
    External Resources
  14. Pappenheimer JR: Sleep and respiration of rats during hypoxia. J Physiol 1977;266:191–207.
  15. Lai YL, Tsuya Y, Hildebrandt J: Ventilatory responses to acute CO2 exposure in the rat. J Appl Physiol 1978;45:611–618.
  16. Walker BR, Adams EM, Voelkel NF: Ventilatory responses of hamsters and rats to hypoxia and hypercapnia. J Appl Physiol 1985;59:1955–1960.
  17. Walker JK, Jennings DB: Ventilatory and metabolic effects of hypercapnia in conscious rats: AVP V1 receptor block. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 1998;76:361–366.
  18. Poole TB (ed): The UFAW Handbook on the Care and Management of Laboratory Animals, ed 6. Harlow, Longman Scientific & Technical, 1986.
  19. Harkness JE, Wagner JE: The Biology and Medicine of Rabbits and Rodents, ed 3. Philadelphia, Lea and Febiger, 1989.
  20. Lai YL, Hildebrandt J: Respiratory mechanics in the anesthetized rat. J Appl Physiol 1978;45:255–260.
  21. Knelson JH, Howatt WF, DeMuth GR: Effect of respiratory pattern on alveolar gas exchange. J Appl Physiol 1970;29:328–331.
  22. Mercat A, Diehl JL, Michard F, Anguel N, Teboul JL, Labrousse J, Richard C: Extending inspiratory time in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med 2001;29:40–44.
  23. Aström E, Uttman L, Niklason L, Aboab J, Brochard L, Jonson B: Pattern of inspiratory gas delivery affects CO2 elimination in health and after acute lung injury. Intensive Care Med 2008;34:377–384.
  24. Fernandez R, Mendez M, Younes M: Effect of ventilator flow rate on respiratory timing in normal humans. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999;159:710–719.
  25. Kondili E, Prinianakis G, Anastasaki M: Acute effects of ventilator settings on respiratory motor output in patients with acute lung injury. Intensive Care Med 2001;27:1147–1157.
  26. Dimitriou G, Greenough A, Laubscher B, Yamaguchi N: Comparison of airway pressure-triggered and airflow-triggered ventilation in very immature infants. Acta Paediatr 1998;87:1256–1260.
  27. Hayashi F, Yoshida A, Fukuda Y, Honda Y: CO2-ventilatory response of the anesthetized rat by rebreathing technique. Pflugers Arch 1982;393:77–82.
  28. Saetta M, Mortola JP: Breathing pattern and CO2 response in newborns rats before and during anesthesia. J Appl Physiol 1985;58:1988–1986.
  29. Stunden CE, Filosa JA, Garcia AJ, Dean JB, Putnam RW: Development of in vivo ventilatory and single chemosensitive neuron responses to hypercapnia in rats. Respir Physiol 2001;127:135–155.
  30. Viale JP, Duperret S, Mahul P, Delafosse B, Delpuech C, Weismann D, Annat G: Time course evolution of ventilatory responses to inspiratory unloading in patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998;157:428–434.
  31. Corne S, Webster K, Younes M: Hypoxic respiratory response during acute stable hypocapnia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003;167:1193–1199.
  32. Sinderby C, Beck J, Spahija de Marchie M, Lacroix J, Navalesi P, Slutsky AS: Inspiratory muscle unloading by neurally adjusted ventilatory assist during maximal inspiratory efforts in healthy subjects. Chest 2007;131:711–717.

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Original Paper

Received: February 03, 2009
Accepted: May 18, 2009
Published online: November 04, 2009
Issue release date: March 2010

Number of Print Pages: 7
Number of Figures: 1
Number of Tables: 1

ISSN: 1661-7800 (Print)
eISSN: 1661-7819 (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/NEO


Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
TOP