Caries Research

Original Paper

The Effect of Placing a Clear Pit and Fissure Sealant on the Validity and Reproducibility of Occlusal Caries Diagnosis

Deery C. · Fyffe H.E. · Nugent Z. · Nuttall N.M. · Pitts N.B.

Author affiliations

Dental Health Services Research Unit, Dental School, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK

Related Articles for ""

Caries Res 1995;29:377–381

Log in to MyKarger to check if you already have access to this content.


Buy

  • FullText & PDF
  • Unlimited re-access via MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

CHF 38.00 *
EUR 35.00 *
USD 39.00 *

Select

KAB

Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!


If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.


Save over 20% compared to the individual article price.

Learn more

Rent/Cloud

  • Rent for 48h to view
  • Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
  • Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
  • Printing and saving restrictions apply

Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00

Select

Subscribe

  • Access to all articles of the subscribed year(s) guaranteed for 5 years
  • Unlimited re-access via Subscriber Login or MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

Subcription rates


Select
* The final prices may differ from the prices shown due to specifics of VAT rules.

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Original Paper

Received: January 13, 1994
Accepted: March 14, 1995
Published online: November 24, 2009
Issue release date: 1995

Number of Print Pages: 5
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 0

ISSN: 0008-6568 (Print)
eISSN: 1421-976X (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/CRE

Abstract

The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess the validity and reproducibility of the diagnosis of fissure caries prior to and following the placement of a clear sealant. One hundred and twelve extracted molar teeth were examined by 7 experienced clinicians. Each examiner conducted four visual examinations, 2 prior to and 2 after sealing, allowing an assessment of reproducibility. The teeth were subsequently serially sectioned to provide the histological validation. After placement of a sealant, a significant (p < 0.05) loss of sensitivity was found for the diagnosis of enamel lesions and dentine lesions, but specificity was not altered. The overall reproducibility expressed by the kappa statistic was 0.60 and 0.47, before and after sealing, respectively. The examiners significantly (p < 0.001) underestimated the severity of lesions detected after sealing compared to their assessment prior to sealing. The investigation suggests that sealed surfaces require careful assessment and monitoring.

© 1995 S. Karger AG, Basel




Related Articles:


Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Original Paper

Received: January 13, 1994
Accepted: March 14, 1995
Published online: November 24, 2009
Issue release date: 1995

Number of Print Pages: 5
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 0

ISSN: 0008-6568 (Print)
eISSN: 1421-976X (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/CRE


Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
TOP