Ophthalmic Research
Original Paper
Effects of Superoxide Dismutase and Catalase on Growth of Retinal Pigment Epithelial Cells in vitro following Addition of Linoleic Acid or Linoleic Acid HydroperoxideAkeo K.a · Hiramitsu T.b · Kanda T.a · Karasawa Y.a · Okisaka S.aaDepartment of Ophthalmology, National Defense Medical College, Saitama, and dPhoton Medical Research Center, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Sizuoka, Japan
|
|
Log in to MyKarger to check if you already have access to this content.
KAB
Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!
If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.
Save over 20% compared to the individual article price.
Article / Publication Details
Received: July 03, 1995
Accepted: October 05, 1995
Published online: December 11, 2009
Issue release date: 1996
Number of Print Pages: 11
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 0
ISSN: 0030-3747 (Print)
eISSN: 1423-0259 (Online)
For additional information: https://www.karger.com/ORE
Abstract
The rod outer segments of the retina that are phagocytized by retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cells are susceptible to lipid peroxidation because of their high content of polyunsaturated fatty acids. Linoleic hydroperoxides (LHP), synthesized by peroxidation of linoleic acids (LA), produce greater damage to retinal function than does LA. We compared the effects of LHP and LA on the growth of cultured chick embryonic RPE cells and analyzed a model of data sets using multiple linear regression for the number of cells as a function of time. The spectrum of LA had a sharp peak at 205 nm and a broad spectrum at 235 nm, while LHP had only a broad spectrum at 235 nm. Exposure to LA and LHP caused dose-dependent damage of chick embryonic RPE cells: they were significantly more affected by the addition of LHP than LA. The antioxidative enzymes catalase and superoxide dismutase minimized damage to the RPE cells caused by LHP in proportion to the enzyme concentration. However, RPE cells incubated with LA were more affected by the enzymes than when no enzymes were added.
© 1996 S. Karger AG, Basel
Related Articles:
Article / Publication Details
Received: July 03, 1995
Accepted: October 05, 1995
Published online: December 11, 2009
Issue release date: 1996
Number of Print Pages: 11
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 0
ISSN: 0030-3747 (Print)
eISSN: 1423-0259 (Online)
For additional information: https://www.karger.com/ORE
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

Get Permission