Ophthalmologica

Original Paper · Travail original · Originalarbeit

In vitro Viability of External Eye Microbial Flora in Hydroxy-Propyl-Methylcellulose

Mastropasqua L.a · Piccolomini R.b · Carpineto P.a · Ciancaglini M.a · Falconio G.a · Di Bonaventura G.b · Costagliola C.c · Gallenga P.E.a

Author affiliations

aInstitute of Ophthalmology and Legal Medicine and bSection of Clinical Microbiology, Institute of Experimental Medicine, University ‘G. D’Annunzio’, Chieti, and cEye Clinic, 2nd University, Naples, Italy

Related Articles for ""

Ophthalmologica 1999;213:265–268

Log in to MyKarger to check if you already have access to this content.


Buy

  • FullText & PDF
  • Unlimited re-access via MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

CHF 38.00 *
EUR 35.00 *
USD 39.00 *

Select

KAB

Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!


If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.


Save over 20% compared to the individual article price.

Learn more

Rent/Cloud

  • Rent for 48h to view
  • Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
  • Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
  • Printing and saving restrictions apply

Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00

Select

Subscribe

  • Access to all articles of the subscribed year(s) guaranteed for 5 years
  • Unlimited re-access via Subscriber Login or MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

Subcription rates


Select
* The final prices may differ from the prices shown due to specifics of VAT rules.

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Original Paper · Travail original · Originalarbeit

Published online: July 09, 1999
Issue release date: July – August

Number of Print Pages: 4
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 1

ISSN: 0030-3755 (Print)
eISSN: 1423-0267 (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/OPH

Abstract

The aim of this study was to verify the in vitro influence of various dilutions of a viscoelastic substance containing 2% hydroxy-propyl-methylcellulose (HPMC) on the viability of some microbial strains representative of the normal flora of the external eye. Pure reference strain cultures of Candida albicans, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Propionibacterium acnes, Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis and a fresh clinical isolate of Proteus mirabilis were selected for this study. Serial twofold dilutions of 2% HPMC, prepared so as to obtain a final concentration ranging from 50 to 0.78% of the product in sterile saline solution (0.85% NaCl), were taken out with a pipette that delivered 1.0 ml per tube. One hundred microliters of the abovementioned microbial inocula, used for the evaluation of the positive control of the test organism, were dispensed into each tube. After 24 h of incubation, 100 μl of samples were taken from each tube and plated into the specific medium for the growth of the test organism. After 24–48 h of incubation, these agar plates were examined and the colony-forming-unit count of each test organism was compared to the corresponding total colony count, acting as a positive control, in order to determine the quantitative variation of the test organism grown in the presence of the viscoelastic compounds. C. albicans and P. aeruginosa showed a statistically significant increase in growth with HPMC dilutions varying from 1:2 to 1:16. P. acnes and P. mirabilis growth was significantly reduced by all dilutions except for the 1:128 one. S. epidermidis growth was also significantly reduced in the presence of HPMC dilutions varying from 1:2 to 1:64. S. aureus growth was not significantly influenced. The viability of P. aeruginosa in HPMC dilutions needs to be carefully considered because of the ability of this organism to induce endophthalmitis, and the possibility that during cataract surgery, a small amount of HPMC may be left in the eye, trapped behind the intraocular lens optic.




Related Articles:


References

  1. Fechner PU, Fechner MU: Methylcellulose and lens implantation. Br J Ophthalmol 1983;67:259–263.
    External Resources
  2. Aron-Rosa D, Cohn HC, Aron JJ, Bouquety C: Methylcellulose instead of Healon in extracapsular surgery with intraocular lens implantation. Ophthalmology 1983;90:1235–1238.
    External Resources
  3. Fechner PU, Fechner MU: Methylcellulose in lens implantation. Afro Asian J Ophthalmol 1983;2:8–10.
  4. Liesegang TJ, Bourne WM, Ilstrup DM: The use of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose in extracapsular cataract extraction with intraocular lens implantation. Am J Ophthalmol 1986;102:723–726.
    External Resources
  5. Assia EI, Apple DJ, Lim ES, Morgan RC, Tsai JC: Removal of viscoelastic materials after experimental cataract surgery in vitro. J Cataract Refract Surg 1992;18:3–6.
  6. Kattan HM, Flynn HW, Pflugfelder SC: Nosocomial endophthalmitis. Ophthalmology 1991;98:227–238.
  7. Driebe WT Jr, Mandelbaum S, Forster RK, Schwartz LK, Culbertson WW: Pseudophakic endophthalmitis. Diagnosis and management. Ophthalmology 1986;93:442–448.
    External Resources
  8. Cotticelli L, Russo S, Costagliola C, Iura A, Rinaldi E: Moraxella lacunata endophthalmitis after intraocular lens implantation. Eur J Implant Refract Surg 1991;3:152–154.
  9. Doyle A, Beigi B, Early A, Blake A, Eustace P, Hone R: Adherence of bacteria to intraocular lenses: A prospective study. Br J Ophthalmol 1995;79:347–349.
  10. Costagliola C, Del Prete A, Winkler NR, Carpineto P, Ciancaglini M, Piccolomini R, Mastropasqua L: The ability of bacteria to use Na-hyaluronate as a nutrient. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1996;74:566–568.
  11. Hashimoto M, Takeda M, Suzuki JI, Miyazaki I, Sekine N, Ohyachi H, Adachi JI, Nakagawa T: Four cases of postoperative endophthalmitis. Folia Ophthalmol Jpn 1990;41:792–798.
  12. Heaven CJ, Mann PJ, Boase DL: Endophthalmitis following extracapsular cataract surgery: A review of 32 cases. Br J Ophthalmol 1992;76:419–423.
  13. Wenkel H, Rummelt V, Knorr H, Naumann GOH: Chronic postoperative endophthalmitis following cataract extraction and intraocular lens implantation. Report on nine patients. Ger J Ophthalmol 1993;2:419–425.
  14. Verbraeken H, Verbraeken G: Intracapsular and extracapsular pseudophakic endophthalmitis: A comparison. Doc Ophthalmol 1993;84:387–393.
  15. Gallenga PE, Mastropasqua L, Carpineto P, Ciancaglini M, Falconio G, Catamo G, Costagliola C, Piccolomini R: In vitro Staphylococcus epidermidis growth in some viscoelastic substances containing sodium hyaluronate. Ophthalmologica 1998;212:184–187.
  16. Freyler H, Amon M: Postoperative endophthalmitis following IOL-implantation. Spektrum Augenheilkd 1990;4:83–87.
  17. Irwine WD, Flynn HW, Miller D, Pflugfelder SC: Endophthalmitis caused by gram-negative organisms. Arch Opthalmol 1992;110:1450–1454.
  18. Fong DS, Pesavento RD: Pseudomonas endophthalmitis presenting as subacute inflammation. Arch Ophthalmol 1995;113:265.
  19. Duch A, Hurtado M, Lopez-Corell P, Diaz M, Menezo JL, Harto MA: Surgical endophthalmitis. I. Retrospective study on 12 years of endophthalmitis after cataract surgery. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol 1993;65:317–324.
  20. Lawin-Brussel CA, Refojo MF, Kenyon KR: In vitro adhesion of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus to surface passivated poly(methylmethacrylate) intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 1992;18:598–601.
  21. Moreira CA Jr, Moreira AT, Armstrong DK, Jeliffe RW, Woodford CC, Liggett PE, Trousdale MD: In vitro and in vivo studies with sodium hyaluronate as a carrier for intraocular gentamicin. Acta Ophthalmol 1991;69:50–56.

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Original Paper · Travail original · Originalarbeit

Published online: July 09, 1999
Issue release date: July – August

Number of Print Pages: 4
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 1

ISSN: 0030-3755 (Print)
eISSN: 1423-0267 (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/OPH


Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
TOP