Login to MyKarger

New to MyKarger? Click here to sign up.

Login with Facebook

Forgot your password?

Authors, Editors, Reviewers

For Manuscript Submission, Check or Review Login please go to Submission Websites List.

Submission Websites List

Institutional Login
(Shibboleth or Open Athens)

For the academic login, please select your country in the dropdown list. You will be redirected to verify your credentials.

Original Paper

Efficacy and Tolerability of Pegylated Interferon-α2a plus Ribavirin versus Pegylated Interferon-α2b plus Ribavirin in Treatment-Naive Chronic Hepatitis C Patients

Lee S.a · Kim I.H.a · Kim S.H.a · Kim S.W.a · Lee S.O.a · Lee S.T.a · Kim D.G.a · Lee C.S.a · Choi C.S.b · Cho E.Y.b · Kim H.C.b

Author affiliations

aDepartment of Internal Medicine, Research Institute for Medical Science, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, and bDepartment of Internal Medicine, Wonkwang University College of Medicine and Hospital, Iksan, South Korea

Corresponding Author

In Hee Kim, MD

Department of Internal Medicine, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine

Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital

634-18 Keumam-dong, Dukjin-ku, Jeonju, Jeonbuk 561-712 (South Korea)

Tel. +82 63 250 1677, Fax +82 63 254 1609, E-Mail ihkimmd@chonbuk.ac.kr

Related Articles for ""

Intervirology 2010;53:146–153

Do you have an account?

Login Information

Contact Information

I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.


Objectives: The authors compared the efficacies and tolerabilities of pegylated interferon-α2a (PEG-IFN-α2a) + ribavirin and pegylated interferon-α2b (PEG-IFN-α2b) + ribavirin for the initial treatment of chronic hepatitis C. Methods: A total of 126 treatment-naive patients (29.4% genotype 1, 70.6% genotype non-1) were treated with PEG-IFN-α2a 180 µg/week (group A, n = 79) or PEG-IFN-α2b 1.5 µg/kg/week (group B, n = 47) with ribavirin (800 mg/day for genotype non-1 or 1,000–1,200 mg/day for genotype 1) for 24 (genotype non-1) or 48 weeks (genotype 1). Results: End-of-treatment virologic response, sustained virologic response, and biochemical response were not significantly different in groups A and B (84.8 vs. 89.4%, 70.9 vs. 72.3%, and 70.9 vs. 74.5%, respectively; p > 0.05). In patients with the HCV genotype 1 or non-1, treatment responses were not significantly different. Multivariate analysis showed that HCV genotype only was an independent factor that affected sustained virologic response (p = 0.048). The proportions of treatment discontinuations in groups A and B were similar (10.1 vs. 10.6%; p = 1.000). Conclusions: PEG-IFN-α2a or PEG-IFN-α2b + ribavirin combination therapies showed similar efficacies and tolerabilities as initial treatments for chronic hepatitis C.

© 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Original Paper

Received: August 05, 2009
Accepted: October 20, 2009
Published online: January 13, 2010
Issue release date: April 2010

Number of Print Pages: 8
Number of Figures: 1
Number of Tables: 4

ISSN: 0300-5526 (Print)
eISSN: 1423-0100 (Online)

For additional information: http://www.karger.com/INT

Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.