ORL

 

IgE and IgE Antibody to Mite in Nasal Fluid

Okuda M.

Author affiliations

Department of Otolaryngology, Wakayama Medical College, Wakayama

Related Articles for ""

ORL 1975;37:344–355

Log in to MyKarger to check if you already have access to this content.


Buy

  • FullText & PDF
  • Unlimited re-access via MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

CHF 38.00 *
EUR 35.00 *
USD 39.00 *

Select

KAB

Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!


If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.


Save over 20% compared to the individual article price.

Learn more

Rent/Cloud

  • Rent for 48h to view
  • Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
  • Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
  • Printing and saving restrictions apply

Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00

Select

Subscribe

  • Access to all articles of the subscribed year(s) guaranteed for 5 years
  • Unlimited re-access via Subscriber Login or MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

Subcription rates


Select
* The final prices may differ from the prices shown due to specifics of VAT rules.

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Paper

Published online: January 06, 2010
Issue release date: 1975

Number of Print Pages: 12
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 0

ISSN: 0301-1569 (Print)
eISSN: 1423-0275 (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/ORL

Abstract

The levels of total IgE and IgE antibodies to mite per unit quantity of nasal fluid were successfully determined by our special method of collecting nasal fluid. The mean value of IgE was 80 ± 101 U/ml, and that of IgE Ab 1.45 ± 1.29/ml (RAST score) in NF. Nasal IgE concentration was approximately one twenthieth of serum IgE on the average, and nasal IgE Ab to mite was one half of serum IgE. The IgE Ab/IgE ratio was nine times greater in NF (0.0181) than in serum (0.0022). The concentration of IgE Ab to mite was very well correlated between serum and NF (correlation coefficient of 0.83), while that of IgE was not (coefficient of 0.51). IgE Ab to mite was also well correlated to IgE (coefficient of 0.78) in NF while it was not in serum (coefficient of 0.48). The correlation coefficient of nasal/serum IgA was 0.41; that of IgE/IgA in NF was 0.31; and that of IgE/total protein in NF was also 0.31. The possibility of local production and secretion of IgE Ab to specific allergen is discussed in detail.

© 1975 S. Karger AG, Basel




Related Articles:


Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Paper

Published online: January 06, 2010
Issue release date: 1975

Number of Print Pages: 12
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 0

ISSN: 0301-1569 (Print)
eISSN: 1423-0275 (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/ORL


Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
TOP