Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
Regular Article
Hypochondriasis and Symptom Reporting – The Effect of Attention versus DistractionHaenen M.-A.a · Schmidt A.J.M.a · Kroeze S.b · van den Hout M.A.bDepartments of aMedical Psychology and bExperimental Abnormal Psychology, University of Limburg, Maastricht, The Netherlands
|
|
Log in to MyKarger to check if you already have access to this content.
KAB
Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!
If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.
Save over 20% compared to the individual article price.
Article / Publication Details
Published online: February 18, 2010
Issue release date: 1996
Number of Print Pages: 6
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 0
ISSN: 0033-3190 (Print)
eISSN: 1423-0348 (Online)
For additional information: https://www.karger.com/PPS
Abstract
Background: This study examined symptom perception in hypochondriacal patients without physical stimulation. Methods: Seventeen outpatients with DSM-III-R hypochondriasis and 16 healthy control subjects were compared. All subjects were asked to report perceived sensations in three conditions: attention, distraction and control. Results: It was found that hypochondriacal subjects showed remarkably higher levels of symptom reporting than healthy subjects in all three conditions. In spite of excessive attention to bodily sensations in a control condition, attention instructions still added significantly to symptom reporting in hypochondriacal patients. The effect of distraction was not significant in either of the groups. Furthermore, group differences in symptom reporting appeared to be related to preoccupation with bodily symptoms rather than to general anxiety level as measured by the STAI. Conclusions: Hypochondriacal patients report more bodily sensations than healthy controls when no instructions are given. In addition, focussing on bodily sensations seems to cause a significant overall increase of perceived symptoms in hypochondriacal patients, whereas in healthy subjects there is a trend towards an increase in symptom reporting.
© 1996 S. Karger AG, Basel
Related Articles:
Article / Publication Details
Published online: February 18, 2010
Issue release date: 1996
Number of Print Pages: 6
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 0
ISSN: 0033-3190 (Print)
eISSN: 1423-0348 (Online)
For additional information: https://www.karger.com/PPS
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

Get Permission