Insidious Urinary Retention after Vaginal Delivery: Prevalence and Symptoms at Follow-Up in a Population-Based StudyAndolf E. · Iosif C.S. · Jörgensen C. · Rydhström H.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Lund, Sweden
Do you have an account?
- Rent for 48h to view
- Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
- Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
- Printing and saving restrictions apply
Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00
Article / Publication Details
The purpose of this study was to investigate the prevalence of postpartum urinary retention in women after vaginal delivery and to determine whether parturients with retention develop voiding problems later. During a 3-month period, all parturients in the catchment area of the University Hospital, Lund, were investigated 3 days after delivery, residual volume being measured by ultrasonography. All those with postpartal retention were contacted 4 years after delivery, when they were reexamined by ultrasonography and asked to fill in a questionnaire regarding urinary problems. In all, 539 women were scanned post partum, and 8 (1.5%) had a residual volume exceeding 150 ml (range 156–320 ml). Retention was more common among primiparae after instrumental delivery or epidural analgesia. The symptoms were normalized spontaneously within a few days in all cases. At follow-up 4 years later, the prevalence of urinary symptoms was not higher than that in the general population. Ultrasonography to detect urinary retention does not seem to have any place in the normal postpartal care. However, extended supervision may be appropriate in parturients receiving epidural analgesia or in those submitted to instrumental deliveries.
© 1994 S. Karger AG, Basel
Article / Publication Details
Copyright / Drug Dosage / DisclaimerCopyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.