International Archives of Allergy and Immunology

Original Paper

Characterization of the T-Cell Epitopes of the Major Peach Allergen Pru p 3

Pastorello E.A.a · Monza M.b · Pravettoni V.b · Longhi R.d · Bonara P.c · Scibilia J.a · Primavesi L.b · Scorza R.b

Author affiliations

aUnit of Allergology and Immunology, Niguarda Ca’ Granda Hospital, bClinical Allergy and Immunology Unit and cUO Medicina Interna 1/B, Foundation IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, and dICRM, CNR Milan, Milan, Italy

Related Articles for ""

Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2010;153:1–12

Log in to MyKarger to check if you already have access to this content.


Buy

  • FullText & PDF
  • Unlimited re-access via MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

CHF 38.00 *
EUR 35.00 *
USD 39.00 *

Select

KAB

Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!


If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.


Save over 20% compared to the individual article price.

Learn more

Rent/Cloud

  • Rent for 48h to view
  • Buy Cloud Access for unlimited viewing via different devices
  • Synchronizing in the ReadCube Cloud
  • Printing and saving restrictions apply

Rental: USD 8.50
Cloud: USD 20.00

Select

Subscribe

  • Access to all articles of the subscribed year(s) guaranteed for 5 years
  • Unlimited re-access via Subscriber Login or MyKarger
  • Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

Subcription rates


Select
* The final prices may differ from the prices shown due to specifics of VAT rules.

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Original Paper

Received: November 05, 2008
Accepted: November 05, 2009
Published online: March 30, 2010
Issue release date: August 2010

Number of Print Pages: 12
Number of Figures: 3
Number of Tables: 5

ISSN: 1018-2438 (Print)
eISSN: 1423-0097 (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/IAA

Abstract

Background: Pru p 3 is the major peach allergen recognized by more than 90% of peach-allergic individuals of the Mediterranean area. Identification of the dominant Pru p 3 T-cell epitopes can improve our understanding of the immune responses against this protein and could be helpful in the development of hypoallergenic immunotherapy. For this purpose, we examined the phenotypes, specificities and cytokine secretion profiles of proliferating T cells in response to Pru p 3 in peach-allergic individuals. Methods: Peripheral blood mononuclear cells from 15 peach-allergic patients were incubated with Pru p 3. The proliferation of antigen-specific T-cell lines (TCLs) was assessed by tritiated methylthymidine incorporation. T-cell epitopes were identified by analyzing the reactivity of TCLs against 8 overlapping peptides spanning the entire length of Pru p 3. We characterized the phenotype of Pru-p-3-specific TCLs by flow cytometry and analyzed their production of interleukin (IL) 4 and γ-interferon (IFN-γ) by ELISA. Results: Ninety-two Pru-p-3-specific TCLs were isolated (stimulation index ≧5). These TCLs proliferated mainly in response to Pru p 312–27 and Pru p 357–72. Pru-p-3-specific TCLs were mainly CD4+ (81%) and expressed cell surface CD30. In addition, TCLs produced high levels of IL-4 and low levels of IFN-γ, indicating a Th2 phenotype. Conclusions: Two immunodominant T-cell-reactive regions of Pru p 3 were identified: Pru p 312–27 and Pru p 357–72. These peptides showed a differential ability to elicit a Th2 response. Taken together, our results provide a better understanding of the immunological T-cell reactivity against Pru p 3.

© 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel




Related Articles:


References

  1. Cuesta Herranz J, Lázaro M, Figueredo E, et al: Allergy to plant derived fresh fruits in a birch-ragweed-free area. Clin Exp Allergy 2000;30:1411–1416.
  2. Sánchez-Monge R, Lombardero M, Garcia-Selles FJ, Barber D, Salcedo G: Lipid-transfer proteins are relevant allergens in fruit allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1999;103:514–519.
  3. Van Ree R: Clinical importance of non-specific lipid transfer protein as food allergens. Biochem Soc Trans 2002;30:910–913.
  4. Cuesta Herranz J, Lazaro M, de las Heras M, Lluch M, Figueredo E, Umpierrez A, Hernandez J, Cuesta C: Peach allergy pattern: experience in 70 patients. Allergy 1998;53:78–82.
  5. Fernandez-Rivas M, van Ree R, Cuevas M: Allergy to Rosaceae fruits without related pollinosis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1997;100:728–733.
  6. Pastorello EA, Ortolani C, Farioli L, Pravettoni V, Ispano M, Borga A, et al: Allergenic cross-reactivity among peach, apricot, plum and cherry in patients with oral allergy syndrome: an in vivo and in vitro study. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1994;94:699–707.
  7. Pastorello EA, Ortolani C, Farioli L, Pravettoni V, Ispano M, Monza M, et al: The major allergen of peach (Prunus persica) is a lipid transfer protein. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1999;103:520–526.
  8. Pastorello EA, Ortolani C, Baroglio C, Pravettoni V, Ispano M, Giuffrida MG, Fortunato D, et al: Complete amino acid sequence determination of the major allergen of peach (Prunus persica) Pru p 3. Biol Chem 1999;380:1315–1320.
  9. Kader JC: Lipid-transfer proteins in plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 1996;47:627–654.
  10. Lindorff-Larsen K, Winther JR: Surprisingly high stability of barley lipid transfer protein, LTP1, towards denaturant, heat and proteases. FEBS Lett 2001;488:145–148.
  11. Asero R, Mistrello G, Roncarolo D, de Vries SC, Gautier MF, Ciurana CLF, Verbeek E, Mohammadi T, Knul-Brettlova V, Akkerdaas JH, Bulder I, Aalberse RC, van Ree R: Lipid transfer protein: a pan-allergen in plant-derived foods that is highly resistant to pepsin digestion. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2000;122:20–32.
  12. Brenna O, Pompei C, Ortolani C, Pravettoni V, Farioli L, Pastorello EA: Technological processes to decrease the allergenicity of peach juice and nectar. J Agric Food Chem 2000;48:493–497.
  13. García-Casado G, Pacios LF, Díaz-Perales A, Sánchez-Monge R, Lombardero M, García-Selles FJ, Polo F, Barber D, Salcedo G: Identification of IgE-binding epitopes of the major peach allergen Pru p 3. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2003;112:599–605.
  14. Díaz-Perales A, Sanz ML, García-Casado G, Sánchez-Monge R, García-Selles FJ, Lombardero M, Polo G, Gamboa PM, Barber D, Salcedo G: Recombinant Pru p 3 and natural Pru p 3, a major peach allergen, show equivalent immunologic reactivity: a tool for the diagnosis of fruit allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2003;111:628–633.
  15. Tordesillas L, Cuesta-Herranz J, Gonzalez-Munoz M, Pacios LF, Compes E, Garcia-Carrasco B, Sanchez-Monge R, Salcedo G, Diaz-Perales A: T-cell epitopes of the major peach allergen, Pru p 3: identification and differential T-cell response of peach-allergic and non-allergic subjects. Mol Immunol 2009;46:722–728.
  16. Schulten V, Radakovics A, Hartz C, Mari A, Vazquez-Cortes S, Fernandez-Rivas M, Lauer I, Jahn-Schmid B, Eiwegger T, Scheurer S, Bohle B: Characterization of the allergic T-cell response to Pru p 3, the nonspecific lipid transfer protein in peach. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2009;124:100–107.
  17. Alexander J, Sidney J, Southwood S, Ruppert J, Oseroff C, Maewal A, Snoke K, Serra HM, Kubo RT, Sette A, et al: Development of high potency universal DR-restricted helper epitopes by modification of high affinity DR-blocking peptides. Immunity 1994;1:751–761.
  18. del Guercio MF, Alexander J, Kubo RT, Arrhenius T, Maewal A, Appella E, Hoffman SL, Jones T, Valmori D, Sakaguchi K, Grey HM, Sette A: Potent immunogenic short linear peptide constructs composed of B cell epitopes and pan DR T helper epitopes (PADRE) for antibody responses in vivo. Vaccine 1997;15:441–448.
  19. Muller U, Akdis CA, Fricker M, Akdis M, Blesken T, Bettens F, Blaser K: Successful immunotherapy with T-cell epitope peptides of bee venom phospholipase A2 induces specific T-cell anergy in patients allergic to bee venom. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1998;101:747–754.
  20. Fellrath JM, Kettner A, Dufour N, Frigerio C, Schneeberger D, Leimgruber A, Corradini G, Spertini F: Allergen-specific T-cell tolerance induction with allergen-derived long synthetic peptides: results of phase I trial. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2003;111:854–861.
  21. Oldfield WL, Larche M, Kay AB: Effect on T-cell peptides derived from Fel d 1 on allergic reactions and cytokine production in patients sensitive to cats: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2002;360:47–53.
  22. Kay AB, Larche M: Allergen immunotherapy with cat allergen peptides. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2000;122:229–237.
  23. Rolland JM, Douglass J, O’Hehir RE: Allergen immunotherapy: current and new therapeutic strategies. Expert Opin Invest Drugs 2000;9:515–527.
  24. Haselden BM, Kay AB, Larche M: Peptide-mediated immune responses in specific immunotherapy. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2000;122:229–237.
  25. Dreborg S, Foucard T: Allergy to apple, carrot, and potato in children with birch pollen allergy. Allergy 1983;38:167–172.
  26. Fields GB, Noble RL: Solid phase peptide synthesis utilizing 9-fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl amino acids. Int J Pept Protein Res 1990;35:161–214.
  27. King DS, Fields CG, Fields GB: A cleavage method which minimizes side reactions following Fmoc solid phase peptide synthesis. Int J Pept Protein Res 1990;36:255–266.
  28. Bohle B, Radakovics A, Lüttkopf D, Jahn-Schmid B, Vieths S, Ebner C: Characterization of the T cell response to the major hazelnut allergen, Cor a 1.04: evidence for a relevant T cell epitope not cross-reactive with homologous pollen allergens. Clin Exp Allergy 2005;35:1392–1399.
  29. Bodmer JG, Marsh SGE, Albert ED, Bodmer WF, Bontrop RE, Charron D, Dupont B, Erlich HA, Fauchet R, Mach B, Mayr WR, Parham P, Sasazuchi T, Schreuder GM, Strominger JL, Svejgaard A, Terasaki PI: Nomenclature for factors of HLA system; in Charron D (ed): Proceedings of the 12th International Histocompatibility Workshop and Conference. Paris, Medical and Science International Publisher, 1997, vol 1, p 505.
  30. Del Prete G, De Carli M, Almerigogna F, Daniel CK, D’Elios MM, Zancuoghi G, Vinante F, Zizzolo G, Romagnani S: Preferential expression of CD30 by human CD4+ T-cells producing Th2-type cytokines. FASEB J 1995;9:81–86.
  31. Shade RP, Van Ieperen-Van Dijk AG, Versluis C, Van Reijsen FC, Kimpen JLL, Bruijnzeel CAPM, Knol EF, Van Hoffen E: Cell-surface expression of CD25, CD26, and CD30 by allergen-specific T-cells is intrinsically different in cow’s milk allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2002;109:357–362.
  32. Pastorello E, Farioli L, Pravettoni V, Ispano M, Scibola E, Trambaioli C, et al: The maize major allergen which is responsible for food induced allergic reactions is a lipid transfer protein. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2000;106:744–751.
  33. Pastorello EA, D’Ambrosio FP, Pravettoni V, Farioli L, Giuffrida G, Monza M, Ansaloni R, Fortunato D, Scibola E, Rivolta F, Incorvaia C, Bengtsson A, Conti A, Ortolani C: Evidence for a lipid transfer protein as the major allergen of apricot. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2000;105:371–377.
  34. Pastorello EA, Farioli L, Pravettoni V, Robino AM, Scibilia J, Fortunato D, et al: Lipid transfer protein and vicilin are important walnut allergens in patients not allergic to pollen. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2004;114:908–914.
  35. Pastorello EA, Farioli L, Pravettoni V, Ortolani CM, Fortunato D, Giuffrida MG, et al: Identification of grape and wine allergens as an endochitinase 4, a lipid transfer protein and a thaumatin. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2003;111:350–359.
  36. Jahn-Schmid B, Radakovics A, Luttkopf D, Scheurer S, Vieths S, Ebner C, Bohle B: Bet v 1142–156 is the dominant T-cell epitope of the major birch pollen allergen and important for cross-reactivity with Bet v 1-related food allergens. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2005;116:213–219.
  37. Bohle B: T-cell epitopes of food allergens. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 2006;30:97–108.
  38. Glaspole IN, de Leon MP, Rolland M, O’Hehir RE: Characterization of the T-cell epitopes of a major peanut allergen, Ara h 2. Allergy 2005;60:35–40.
  39. Vella A, Teague TK, Ihle J, Kappler J, Marrack P: Interleukin 4 (IL-4) or IL-7 prevents the death of resting T-cells: stat6 is probably not required for the effect of IL-4. J Exp Med 1997;186:325–330.
  40. Tsuji K, Aizawa M, Sasazuki T (eds): HLA 1991 – Proceedings of the 11th International Histocompatibility Workshop and Conference. Oxford, Oxford Scientific Publications, 1992, vol 1, pp 1166–1169.
  41. Kay AB, Larche M: Allergen immunotherapy with cat allergen peptides. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2000;122:229–237.
  42. Ferreira F, Hirtenlehner K, Jilek A, Godnik-Cvar J, Breitened H, Grimm R, Hoffmann-Sommergruber K, Scheiner O, Kraft D, Breitenbach M, Rheinberger HJ, Ebner C: Dissection of immunoglobulin E and T lymphocyte reactivity of isoforms of the major birch pollen allergen Bet v 1: potential use of hypoallergenic isoforms for immunotherapy. J Exp Med 1996;183:599–609.

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Original Paper

Received: November 05, 2008
Accepted: November 05, 2009
Published online: March 30, 2010
Issue release date: August 2010

Number of Print Pages: 12
Number of Figures: 3
Number of Tables: 5

ISSN: 1018-2438 (Print)
eISSN: 1423-0097 (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/IAA


Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
TOP