Login to MyKarger

New to MyKarger? Click here to sign up.

Login with Facebook

Forgot your password?

Authors, Editors, Reviewers

For Manuscript Submission, Check or Review Login please go to Submission Websites List.

Submission Websites List

Institutional Login
(Shibboleth or Open Athens)

For the academic login, please select your country in the dropdown list. You will be redirected to verify your credentials.

Original Paper

Free Access

Assessment of Left Ventricular Pre-Ejection Period in the Fetus Using Simultaneous Magnetocardiography and Echocardiography

Mensah-Brown N.A.a · Wakai R.T.a · Cheulkar B.b · Srinivasan S.c · Strasburger J.F.b

Author affiliations

aDepartment of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisc., bDepartment of Pediatrics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisc., and cDepartment of Pediatrics, American Family Children’s Hospital, UW, Madison, Wisc., USA

Corresponding Author

Janette F. Strasburger, MD

Children’s Hospital of Wisconsin – Fox Valley

2nd Floor Pavilion, 130 Second St., Neenah, WI 54956 (USA)

Tel. +1 920 969 5301, Fax +1 920 969 7909

E-Mail jstrasburger@chw.org

Related Articles for ""

Fetal Diagn Ther 2010;28:167–174

Do you have an account?

Login Information

Contact Information

I have read the Karger Terms and Conditions and agree.


Introduction: Fetal magnetocardiography (fMCG) is a promising new technique for assessing fetal rhythm; however, no prior studies have utilized fMCG to evaluate human fetal electromechanical physiology. Pre-ejection period (PEP) is an important measure of the electromechanical activation of the heart, and is altered by disease states and arrhythmias. Materials and Methods: A novel technique was used to assess fetal PEP and its relationship to other fetal systolic time intervals, RR interval, and gestational age (GA). 25 normal human fetuses between 19 and 38 weeks’ gestation were studied using simultaneous pulsed Doppler ultrasound and fMCG. Correlations among PEP, ejection time, QRS width and RR interval were assessed using linear regression. Results: Across all subjects, PEP was found to correlate with GA (R = 0.57, p < 0.0001), QRS width (R = 0.35, p = 0.026), and RR interval (R = 0.37, p = 0.018). In individual sessions, PEP negatively correlated beat-to-beat with the preceding RR interval. Conclusion: PEP exhibits developmental trends that provide a better understanding of the normal development of the human fetal heart.

© 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview
Abstract of Original Paper

Received: May 04, 2010
Accepted: June 29, 2010
Published online: October 26, 2010
Issue release date: October 2010

Number of Print Pages: 8
Number of Figures: 6
Number of Tables: 1

ISSN: 1015-3837 (Print)
eISSN: 1421-9964 (Online)

For additional information: http://www.karger.com/FDT

Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.